ࡱ>  ֲbjbj 7& 8/tR?U"wwwRRR$nRRRRRwwք8)8)8)Rww8)R8)8);jowЎ Q:03l80kltjpooRR8)RRRRRx$RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR : WESTERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY Regular Meeting of the FACULTY SENATE Tuesday, 2 December 2008 4:00 p.m. Capitol Rooms - University Union A C T I O N M I N U T E S SENATORS PRESENT: L. Baker-Sperry, C. Blackinton, V. Boynton, L. Brice, J. Clough, L. Conover, K. Daytner, J. Deitz, D. DeVolder, L. Erdmann, R. Hironimus-Wendt, M. Hoge, V. Jelatis, M. Maskarinec, L. Meloy, D. Mummert, G. Pettit, T. Pfafman, C. Pynes, M. Siddiqi, I. Szabo Ex-officio: Jack Thomas, Provost; T. Kaul, Parliamentarian SENATORS ABSENT: A. Pathak GUESTS: Richard Chamberlain, Brian Clark, Sean Cordes, Judi Dallinger, Jeffery Darensbourg, Mike Dickson, Tom Erekson, Sharon Evans, Richard Filipink, Al Goldfarb, Ken Hawkinson, Dave Hunter, Bob Intrieri, Iraj Kalantari, Paul Kreider, Inessa Levi, Nancy Parsons, Scott Perkins, Bill Polley, Mike Rodriguez, Dan Romano, Danielle Schilling, Jim Schmidt, Phyllis Self, Aimee Shouse, Bill Thompson, Ron Williams I. Consideration of Minutes 11 November 2008 APPROVED AS DISTRIBUTED II. Announcements A. Approvals from the Provost 1. Request for Change in Minor a. Accountancy 2. Request for Change in Major a. Accountancy 3. Request for Change in Certificate of Undergraduate Studies a. Fire Prevention Technology B. Provosts Report Provost Thomas reported that over 30 departments have finished or nearly finished their professional achievement award (PAA) revisions. Currently, six departmental program reviews are scheduled for the remainder of the academic year. Campus visits are underway for the position of Dean of the College of Education and Human Services. One candidate is on campus today, two others will visit on December 4, and the final candidate will visit 鶹 on December 9. Vitas for all candidates have been posted online. Provost Thomas told senators the University is working to enhance distance education: 33 internet (IC) courses were offered last spring with 857 possible seats, and 48 are scheduled for the upcoming spring semester with 1,453 possible seats. Provost Thomas reported the Board of Trustees Bachelor of Arts (BOT-BA) degree program currently engages in partnerships with 34 community colleges. As an extension of these partnerships, the first BOT-BA graduate will walk in a community college ceremony this month, and 鶹 will send a representative to the ceremony. Additionally, the first nine students to receive doctoral degrees from 鶹 will graduate this month. Provost Thomas encouraged faculty to apply for the Provosts Travel Awards which are housed in the Center for Innovation in Teaching and Research (CITR). C. Student Government Association (SGA) Report (Danielle Schilling, SGA representative to Faculty Senate) The Student Government Association has planned a square clean-up day for downtown Macomb. SGA also gave $500 to the Black Students Association for Thanksgiving turkey baskets and an additional $500 to help with Black History Month expenses. Ms. Schilling reported that SGA President Rob Dulski is working on a comparison of student fees with peer institutions. D. Other Announcements 1. President Goldfarb President Goldfarb posted a letter to the campus community online this week to discuss the current budget situation. He said the global economic crisis has impacted many states, noting that 38 states are now in deficit spending. The State of Illinois is experiencing a $2 billion budget deficit for the current fiscal year. Governor Blagojevich had earlier asked state agencies to hold back three percent of their budgets. Now he has also asked state universities to hold back 2.5 percent, which for 鶹 amounts to $1.5 million of the $1.6 million dollar budget increase received last year. President Goldfarb explained that the state makes payments to 鶹 during the course of the year, and since the state is now placing 2.5 percent of its budget in reserve, 鶹 may not receive that portion of general revenue funds. The President assured senators that 鶹 already holds back two percent of its $110 million yearly budget in order to address requests such as the most recent one, and he has not been informed by the state that the budget reduction will be made permanent. He said the current shortfall highlights the fact that students are now contributing almost as much funding toward higher education as does the state. President Goldfarb reminded senators that last years reserve funds were used to replace chillers in three academic buildings. This year, he had earmarked a three percent operating budget increase for every department on campus contingent upon the availability of the reserve funds; he will not now be able to release those funds, but will not be asking for dollars back from departments or units. The President stated he tries to avoid asking for funds back from units in the middle of a fiscal year because it creates chaos and may result in an inability to provide needed services. He has asked the campus to be as conservative as possible in terms of expenditures for the remainder of the academic year, but expressed his determination to continue to fill faculty vacancies and does not plan to announce a hiring freeze. The President will review, however, vacancies for administrative support positions. President Goldfarb told senators that due to a lack of deferred maintenance funding, some University buildings are literally crumbling. President Goldfarb, Provost Thomas, Vice President Thompson, and SGA President Dulski recently walked through the Browne Hall basement to examine pipe leaks amounting to about $2 million dollars of maintenance, but President Goldfarb stated that work will now need to be delayed. President Goldfarb said the University is in the midst of developing the FY10 budget, and he does not know what recommendations the Illinois Board of Higher Education will make for reduced or different budget levels next year. He said 鶹 is now below the 2002 amount of state support. Increases in 鶹s budget have occurred only as a result of tuition increases. 鶹 remains, however, the third lowest state public institution in terms of tuition and the fourth lowest in terms of total cost to students. The President related the University of Illinois has announced its cost to students has exceeded $20,000 per year for the first time ever. He said 鶹 remains committed to remaining accessible and available to all, and warned that continued reliance on tuition at the expense of state funding means moving away from what higher education was created to do. 鶹 has submitted requests to the state for support for the new Nursing and Engineering programs. President Goldfarb hopes that support will be provided since there are statewide shortages in these programs, and grants have been provided to programs of this nature in the past. President Goldfarb told senators that bids were recently opened for renovation of Memorial Hall, and there is the expectation that bonds will be approved for that project. He hopes construction on the Multicultural Center, provided through student fees, will be completed this spring. This will be 鶹s first green-certified environmentally friendly building on campus, and the President hopes it sets the standard for future construction. President Goldfarb stated that President-Elect Obama met with governors recently and expressed interest in development of federal works projects to stimulate the economy. President Goldfarb vowed to continue to lobby for higher education projects under the federal works umbrella. President Goldfarb reminded senators of a number of accomplishments the University has achieved over the past seven years, including new degree programs, new construction, and some deferred maintenance projects. He expressed his appreciation to students, faculty, and staff for coming together to continue to move the agenda of the University forward in spite of difficult times. He noted students did a good job of lobbying for deferred maintenance funding in Springfield, going so far as to bring pieces of crumbling buildings and fans labeled as 鶹 chillers. President Goldfarb stated that if the budget becomes more difficult, he will come back to governance groups with further information. Senator Boynton expressed relief that faculty searches can continue despite the budget set-back. President Goldfarb remembered that when he arrived at 鶹, the University experienced a similar budget deficit and promised to continue as many faculty searches as possible while reviewing vacancies in non-instructional positions. 2. Vice President Joe Rives and Chief Technology Security Officer Mike Rodriguez Vice President Rives told senators that 鶹 receives about five million emails per day and hundreds of virus attacks per month. A first-launch virus penetrated 鶹 in late September, resulting in 100 users clicking on an email that potentially scanned their computers. Some of the infected computers may have transmitted social security numbers during the attack. He reminded senators that social security numbers can only be present on University computers if they are necessary for light business use and if the user has clearance from the department chair. University Technology wants to implement the full Microsoft Systems Management Server (SMS), systems management software that Vice President Rives says would shut one of the doors malicious agents have used to obtain 鶹s information. He explained that those persons who choose not to use Zimbra email will now need to complete a two-step authentication process in order to use another system. He said users can work with University Technology to complete the process or perform it themselves. The University has purchased forensic software detects social security numbers present on University computers. If there is a breach, the University will have a way of notifying individuals. Currently, every computer user is in a pool and the first available connection goes to the next person on the list. The new system would assign every user a unique internet protocol (IP) address so that it will be easier to identify whose security has been breached in case of a computer attack. Vice President Rives asked that those faculty receiving new computers in the faculty upgrade program not give their older computers to other faculty members to use. University Technology will now take faculty members older computers and wipe them clean before passing them on to the next user. Vice President Rives stated that remnants of information can remain in a computers trash can without the user being aware that it is still accessible. The University is investigating increased storage on the shared P-drive. Faculty are asked to put data they wish to be recovered on the P-drive because hard drives cannot be backed up by the University. Vice President Rives assured senators that the changes being made to University computer usage are intended to be precautionary and to protect employees, students, and alumni users. Mr. Rodriguez told senators that the September computer attack reinforced the need to escalate the timetable for computer security enhancements, stating that in some cases it is very important to be able to move quickly to stop potential threats. He said University Technology will utilize Microsoft MSM as a vehicle that can make the University more efficient and can enable University Technology to remotely touch computers if it has to do so. Mr. Rodriguez stated that as soon as possible after the September event, affected computers were cleaned before being sent back out. A copy of data on the affected computers was retained, and forensic software was purchased to analyze what information on the computers was compromised. In the process, Mr. Rodriguez reported that, on approximately ten computers, data was discovered from different sources that the University felt it needed to report. Mr. Rodriguez stated that the threats are serious enough to necessitate moving up the timetable of the entire computer security initiative. Senator Pynes remarked that Mr. Rodriguez has a difficult job. Senator Pynes recently received a strange email with an active link, which he forwarded to Mr. Rodriguez, Vice President Rives, and Richard Chamberlain, Director of the Center for the Application of Information Technology (CAIT), asking them if the email was legitimate, but he did not receive a response. He noted that some computer users are more sophisticated than others; some users may want to let the appropriate personnel know immediately if anything suspicious is received by them. Senator Pynes remarked it would be nice if 鶹 had a system such as is used by Paypal or eBay that allows users to receive an immediate response to security concerns. Senator Pynes suggested 鶹s  HYPERLINK "mailto:support@wiu.edu" support@wiu.edu address become a place where users could take a pro-active approach and forward suspicious emails received at 鶹. Mr. Rodriguez responded that the anti-spam system in place at 鶹 eliminates about 98 percent of suspicious emails but the decision has been made to err on the side of letting some items through rather than inadvertently block emails that may be legitimate. Mr. Rodriguez told senators plans are in place to begin changing the subject line of questionable emails that are allowed through the spam filter to indicate fraud alert: possible spam. He said University Technology is aggressively trying to present its Help Desk as the one place to direct computer questions and concerns. Senator Baker-Sperry asked what happened to the social security information on the ten computers attacked in September. Mr. Rodriguez responded that due to the capability of the malware that attacked the computers, it was impossible to tell if the social security information had been transmitted elsewhere. He explained the malware program phones home either to get instructions or to transmit information it has gathered. He said the University felt the assumption must be made that the program transmitted the information. 3. The Presidents Office brought to the attention of Faculty Senate the fact that besides two vacancies on the Board of Trustees, two additional positions have been waiting for reappointment since January 2007. This information will be added to the resolution that Faculty Senate at its November meeting approved sending to Governor Blagojevich. 4. Petitions are sought for an at-large vacancy on Faculty Senate to replace Senator Pathak. The term will begin spring 2009 and end fall 2010. An election notice and petition forms are available on the Senate website or from chairs and deans. A listproc message regarding the vacancy was also sent to eligible faculty this week. 5. Chairperson DeVolder thanked outgoing senators Tessa Pfafman and Ashish Pathak for their service this semester. III. Reports of Committees and Councils A. Council on Curricular Programs and Instruction (Nancy Parsons, Chair) 1. Request for New Course a. STAT 409, Probability and Statistics for Middle School Teachers, 3 s.h. STAT 409 APPROVED 2. Request for Change in Minor b. Womens Studies CHANGE OF MINOR APPROVED B. Committee on Provost and Presidential Performance (Christopher Pynes, Chair) 1. Revised Survey Instrument Senator Pynes explained that questions pertaining to the Presidents relationship with the Provost were removed from the Presidents survey last year since the Provost was not evaluated at that time. Those two questions will be reinstated on the Presidents survey this year. Senator Pynes noted that most survey questions are conjunctive and difficult to assess. He pointed out, for example, that in the question, The President creates and supports an environment that is rewarding to work in, there are two questions: that of creating such an environment and that of supporting it. Similarly, in the question, The President initiates policies and programs that support the mission of the University Senator Pynes pointed out that it is one thing to initiate policy and another to initiate programs. He additionally remarked that in a question about whether The President promotes excellence and diversity in faculty, staff, and student activities through management practices, promoting excellence and promoting diversity are two entirely different things. Senator Pynes asked if Faculty Senate has been happy with the survey in the past or if the committee should come up with an easier, more straight-forward survey instrument. Senator Pynes stated he cannot imagine how an executive summary can be written given the kinds of difficult data and because there are two points to nearly every question. Bill Thompson, who served on the Committee on Provost and Presidential Performance when the survey was developed, explained the questions were driven by the job description used when the President was hired. The questions address what the President was hired to do, and much of the phraseology was taken verbatim or very closely from his job description. He added there may no longer be a need to use the job description as the basis for the survey that there was seven or eight years ago. Parliamentarian Kaul remarked that Senator Pynes concerns are well taken and that if there is a need to clean up the survey, it should be done; Faculty Senate should try to avoid as much confusion as possible. He remarked that if senators are confused, there is reason to believe that others reading the survey will be confused as well. Parliamentarian Kaul remarked that the current wording of the question regarding promotion of excellence and diversity is unlikely to provide an accurate response. Senator Boynton shares the opinion that the survey needs to be cleaned up, but cautioned the committee not to make the revised survey overly lengthy because participation has been fairly low and fewer faculty may participate if it gets much longer. Senator Pynes noted that the committee met with the President and Provost in the past to determine what kinds of questions would be helpful to obtain the types of information the President and Provost would like to receive. Parliamentarian Kaul remarked the surveys are intended to measure faculty perceptions, regardless of reality, at any given time, and said the President and Provost may be interested in knowing those perceptions. Senator Pynes remarked that with all of the conjunctions in the current survey, it is hard to determine what people are evaluating and what part of the questions they care about the most. Dave Hunter remarked he began to take the survey but did not complete it because he found it to be confusing, so Senate may have lost part of their respondents due to this fact. Senator Siddiqi believes that faculty perceptions may be confused, and feels there is a need for the questions to be presented with clarity. Motion: That Faculty Senate allow the Committee on Provost and Presidential Performance to rewrite some of the survey questions in order to obtain a meaningful response (Siddiqi) Chairperson DeVolder pointed out that it is within the committees charge to make changes to the survey instrument without a motion, adding that any revisions will need to come back to Faculty Senate for approval before distribution. Senator Pynes noted that the survey is typically distributed at the beginning of spring semester and asked if it will be problematic to distribute it later. Senator Meloy believes it is within the timeline for the survey to be presented to Senate in January for approval, but warned that dividing conjunctive questions into two parts will likely make it a longer instrument. She stated that one of the reasons the deans evaluation committee in her college kept their survey short was to maximize response. Senator Pynes expressed his belief that the survey can be kept to 25 to 26 questions and asked that senators who wish to recommend specific questions email those to him. Sean Cordes remarked that there are concepts such as excellence, safety, pleasantness, and a conducive environment that encompass a lot of things. He feels the comment section can be used to capture strong ideas from respondents. Mr. Cordes reminded senators there are campus resources available to assist in writing surveys that will capture specific ideas, such as the Department of Marketing and Finance. Chairperson DeVolder pointed out that there is also a Survey Research Center on campus that committee members may wish to utilize. Senator Baker-Sperry expressed the opinion that Senator Pynes can do a good job of developing an improved survey, at least initially, and Faculty Senate should let the committee decide whether they need to avail themselves of additional resources. Senator Pynes stated his intention to have a conversation with the President and Provost to ask what kinds of feedback they would find useful. C. Ad Hoc Committee to Study Levels of Funding for Travel and Research (Dave Hunter, Chair) 1. Final Report Dr. Hunter told senators that the committee made the decision to limit their scope because they felt that to examine research funding as well as funding for travel was too large a task. Instead, the committee included in its recommendations suggestions for research concerns that could be addressed by a future committee: research and lab improvement, seed money for new faculty hires, and promotion of research activities occurring across campus. The ad hoc committee made four basic observations about faculty travel: Cost is the number one reason for faculty not attending professional conferences. Eighty percent of survey respondents reported that it costs between $500 and $2000 to attend a primary conference in their fields, and approximately 35 percent of respondents indicated being reimbursed less than half of actual travel costs by their departments. Only about 20 percent of faculty surveyed indicated being reimbursed for 90 percent or more of conference travel expenses. Most departments and colleges, as well as the current Provosts Travel Award, require presenting at professional events as part of the evaluation criteria for travel reimbursement. Dr. Hunter stated that although the committee appreciates the Provosts Award and the steps the University is taking to assist faculty with travel funds, they are concerned the requirement for presentation devalues the professional development activities, networking, process of obtaining cutting-edge information within the discipline, and benefits of representing the University that are associated with conference and workshop attendance. The amount of travel reimbursement varies greatly between colleges and departments. Dr. Hunter explained funding for attendance varies greatly because departments have different needs. The committee believes there should be no dictum across campus regarding the amount of travel reimbursement. Dr. Hunter stated that if one department wishes to support non-tenured faculty development by making travel funding primarily available to that group, for example, that decision would not necessarily be one that should be made by other departments across campus. The committee believes travel reimbursement amounts should be determined individually by departments, but that departments should inform their faculty members about what is available each semester. There is a lack of awareness among faculty regarding department and college travel funding policies. Dr. Hunter stated the committee asked the two representatives from each college to bring back copies of as many travel policies as they could. They found only about six travel policies across the campus. Dr. Hunter stated that the survey showed that most faculty assume their departments or colleges have a written policy, while in reality there are few available. He said the single biggest issue determined by the committee was that departments need to formalize the process, by developing operating papers to outline how travel funding decisions are made. The recommendations of the committee include: Each department and college that provides funding should develop (or review their current policies) a written travel policy. Each department should develop its own funding formula to assist faculty and administrative planning. A specified travel allotment should be presented to the faculty annually. The University/colleges/departments should strive to locate and secure additional funding to support faculty travel and professional development. Dr. Hunter stated the University at all levels could do better at finding external resources to assist with faculty travel and professional development. The committee feels this recommendation is so urgent, they urge that it be included in the University Strategic Planning Goals. The committee appreciates creation of the Provosts Travel Award and encourages its continuance with hopes that amounts can be increased toward fully-funded future domestic and international travel projects. Dr. Hunter stated the committee did not specifically address international travel funding, believing it should be up to colleges and departments as to how this should be determined. Senator Blackinton asked if the committee entertained the idea of every faculty member across campus receiving an allotted travel amount with what is not used returning to the departmental pot. Dr. Hunter stated the more the committee discussed this issue, the more they felt that departments should have discretion regarding travel funding disbursements rather than mandating a set amount of travel funding for each faculty member. He related the committee raised the question of where the money would be found if the decision was made to allot $400 per faculty member. One survey question addressed this issue directly: most respondents (about 71 percent) would like to see a designated amount of travel funds for each faculty member and a pool available to support additional funding needs, however, Dr. Hunter stated faculty dont want to give up the independence of their own departments. He asked if departments receive an influx of money that they are able to divert to travel funding for one year, whether that money should be turned over to the entire campus community to share. Mr. Cordes, who served on the ad hoc committee, told senators he believes the research charge should still be investigated. He also pointed out that the committees charge to investigate levels of travel funding did not specify creation of models for funds distribution. He noted a number of issues came out clearly from the survey comments; faculty want to travel and feel its crucial to professional development. Mr. Cordes stated he always tries to present when he attends conferences because he feels its the best use of the Universitys money. He believes faculty conference attendance is important for the University to promote and display its brand and quality, in addition to being an investment in young professors and others throughout their careers. Mr. Cordes noted information in academic fields changes so fast that conference attendance is vital, but faculty often dont know where travel funds might be available. He suggested Faculty Senate may wish to look at some models that would preserve sovereignty among departments but optimize department travel funds. Provost Thomas stated he created the Provosts Travel Award because when he visited the Department of English and Journalism before he was hired for his position, he heard a cry for travel funding. He received many emailed requests for support from the Provosts office for travel, leading him to submit the Provosts Travel Award as part of the consolidated annual report request for Academic Affairs. He stated when faculty are unable to travel to conferences and workshops, it devalues the professional development and networking that occurs at these events. He asked if conference presentation must always be a requirement for travel funding. Mr. Cordes responded presenting at conferences weighs heavily in prioritization for travel funds allotment, and some departments are not given the option of conference attendance if they are not presenting. Senator Boynton remarked the Department of History does have a travel policy; it prioritizes in favor of those faculty who are presenting because there are limited funds available and the department wants to at least be able to cover the expenses of those endeavors before others. Senator Boynton would be concerned if funding were taken away from faculty who need to present for promotion and tenure and given to those faculty who wish to attend conferences but not present. Senator Siddiqi stated that when faculty members accompany graduate students to professional conferences as part of their career development, the students can apply for travel funding from the Graduate Office, but there is often no option for the faculty member accompanying the student to apply for travel reimbursement. Mr. Cordes stated the Provosts Travel model is a great start for the University and is a capstone for the work that was performed by the committee. He suggested CITRs position in regard to these funds be used to research other opportunities for travel funding and consolidate this information on their website, stating that a single site for this type of information might help focus on what 鶹 as an institution can do to generate ideas for travel funding. NO OBJECTIONS TO THE REPORT Chairperson DeVolder stated the committee has completed its charge. Senator Meloy congratulated the committee on its hard work and excellent report. She recommended a future committee follow up on the ad hoc committees work as specified in its final recommendation. Chairperson DeVolder clarified the final report completes the original charge to the ad hoc committee; if Senate wishes to pursue additional points brought up in the final report, they can establish a future committee to do so. IV. Old Business A. Change of Grade Procedure Chairperson DeVolder told senators he attempted to write language to implement the structure under discussion at the last Senate meeting. He also broke out the special circumstances enumerated at that meeting. Chairperson DeVolder stated the proposed revision to the policy is intended as a starting point for further discussion: Proposed Change of Grade Request: If the instructor makes an error in determining the student's final grade, the reported grade may be changed. Grade changes for other reasons would normally be initiated under the incomplete grade, grade appeal, or academic integrity policies. For changes under this policy, the request for change should be initiated by the instructor and reported to the Registrar's Office within three weeks after the next term begins. The form for submitting the change of grade may be obtained from the department chairperson or the Registrar's Office and must be completed in triplicate, stating clearly and fully the basis for the requested change of grade. The department chairperson must countersign the form, indicating that he or she has reviewed and approved the requested change. Under special circumstances, as outlined below, the grade change shall additionally require the approval and signature of the dean. Upon receipt of a valid grade change form, the Registrars Office will change the permanent record, and will forward one copy of the change of grade report to the students academic advisor and one copy to the student. The Registrars Office will return without action any grade change form that does not meet the specifications for justification and required signatures. Special Circumstances: Special circumstances arise when: the department chair is the instructor of record. In this case the dean signs as the department chairs supervisor, indicating approval of the change. the error in determining the final grade is recognized after the expiration of the three week window for initiating grade changes. the instructor and the department chair cannot agree upon the magnitude or justification for the grade change. As chief academic officer of the college, the dean will review the case with the instructor and department chair, and will render a decision. If either the instructor or the department chair is unwilling to accept the deans decision, that party may request arbitration by the Council on Admission, Graduation, and Academic Standards (CAGAS). In response to a question about incompletes, Chairperson DeVolder pointed out that a separate policy is in existence for incomplete grades, so he included a pointer to that policy and its separate timeline. Senator Siddiqi remarked he feels Senate has sufficiently discussed the change of grade policy and believes the revision prepared by Chairperson DeVolder reflects the discussion of the last meeting. He said while he realizes grade changes are an instructors right, there needs to be a place where disagreements between chairs and instructors can be heard, and the proposed policy revision addresses all of those loopholes. SENATOR SIDDIQI CALLED THE QUESTION NO OBJECTIONS REVISION TO CHANGE OF GRADE POLICY APPROVED 16 YES 3 NO 1 AB B. Library Representation Bylaws Amendment 1. Discussion and Vote Senator Boynton asked senators from the College of Fine Arts and Communication to report on their conversations with faculty in their colleges about the proposed move of the Library from Arts and Sciences to Fine Arts and Communication for purposes of Senate voting and representation. Senator Szabo reported that at a faculty meeting of the School of Music held today, all present were against the move. Senator Blackinton reported that faculty in the Department of Theatre and Dance met before Thanksgiving Break. Of the eight faculty present, five voted against the move and three supported it. Senator Blackinton also spoke to those who did not attend the faculty meeting. She said faculty she spoke to felt that the Library should have a designated seat on Senate. She said concerns were expressed that library faculty may not be able to represent the artistic side of Fine Arts and Communication on committees and councils. Senator Clough stated faculty from the Department of Art also voted against the proposed bylaws amendment. She said Art faculty feel that faculty librarians serve the entire University and would like to see a way that they could be granted their own seat on Faculty Senate, pointing out that the Library has long wanted this and Art faculty do not think it is unreasonable. Senator Pfafman reported the consensus was the same from faculty in the Department of Communication: they do not support the proposed amendment but also thought Faculty Senate should consider the issue of giving the Library its own seat at the table. Senator Blackinton, reporting for the Department of Broadcasting, stated those faculty were adamant that the Library not be moved to Fine Arts and Communication for purposes of voting and representation. She said Communication Science and Disorders faculty were also opposed to the change in the bylaws and asked that an alternative method be devised to provide Library representation on Senate. Senator Pynes pointed out that as a senator representing the College of Arts and Sciences, he also represents Library faculty, and since they say they wish to move from one college to another, he feels he should support that request. He noted, however, that Fine Arts and Communication currently holds two Senate seats, and if they receive a third seat as a result of the bylaws amendment, two librarians could be elected and Fine Arts and Communication could lose a seat rather than gain one. Alternatively, he asked if any group of 18 faculty should be granted their own seat when the Constitution specifies that 40 faculty are needed for each seat on Senate. Senator DeVolder stated the issue is not that the Executive Committee hasnt found a way for the Library to have its own seat on Senate; an amendment to that effect was brought before Senate five years ago, was defeated, and could be presented again if the Library desires. Bill Thompson from University Libraries told senators the issue has always been that the Library does not feel that its interests are best represented on Faculty Senate. He believes Arts and Sciences does not currently represent Library interests and is incapable of doing so. Dr. Thompson pointed out that University Libraries serves the entire University, has its own dean, and has a unique function, but has never been represented on Faculty Senate. When Dr. Thompson and former senator Marcy Allen served on Senate, they were elected at-large and did not represent the Library specifically. Dr. Thompson pointed out that the Department of History currently has three senators seated, but faculty librarians have run in every Senate election without getting elected because its natural for faculty to vote for others within their college who are trying to get promotion and tenure. Several senators corrected Dr. Thompson, stating they ran unopposed for their seats or knew of others that ran unopposed with no Library faculty on the ballot. Dr. Thompson concluded the Library has no special connection or inevitable relationship with Arts and Sciences. Dr. Filipink said it seems that Dr. Thompson has indicated faculty librarians will not represent the interests of Arts and Sciences when serving on Senate. He stated that senators are supposed to represent the faculty and not their own individual interests. He concluded if Dr. Thompson is making the argument that he only wants to represent the Library, he is making the case that faculty librarians will not represent any college in which they are placed. Senator Siddiqi summarized it seems that Fine Arts and Communication does not want the Library as part of that college for purposes of voting and representation but does want the Library to be represented on Senate. Senator Siddiqi said he cannot vote yes to the amendment knowing that the majority of faculty in the College of Fine Arts and Communication do not support it, but he can request that the Library bring forward another amendment in January asking that the Constitution be changed to allow one representative for University Libraries. Senator Siddiqi does not anticipate a lot of opposition to this request. When asked why the proposal for a dedicated Library seat did not pass the last time it was presented, Dr. Thompson responded it failed by one vote. Parliamentarian Kaul remarked that in case the Library is provided with a dedicated Senate seat regardless of faculty size, there are other units on campus that may wish to see their interests represented around the Senate table. He asked how Faculty Senate would plan to balance the interests of other units across campus. Senator Pynes stated he does not think 18 faculty members are sufficient to grant one seat at Faculty Senate. Senator Baker-Sperry pointed out that there are other bodies on faculty on campus that, similarly to the Library, have to be counted with larger bodies for purposes of voting and representation: Illinois Institute for Rural Affairs, Counseling Center, coaches, the Honors College. She asked if the total numbers of all of those bodies together would equal 40 faculty. Senator Hironimus-Wendt expressed his disappointment with the unanimity against allowing Library faculty to become part of the College of Fine Arts and Communication for Senate purposes, stating his intention to change his vote because of this. He said while he understands the reason is because COFAC faculty are afraid of losing their voice on Senate, he finds it somewhat troubling. Senator Hironimus-Wendt also expressed his disappointment at the tenor of the conversation that suggests there are units on this campus that are not represented and cannot be represented. The senator pointed out that while the Library may be a unique unit, Natural Sciences faculty are also routinely unrepresented on Senate because their schedules prohibit their attendance at Tuesday afternoon meetings. Senator Hironimus-Wendt added he ran unopposed for senator at-large three years ago, so there are opportunities for librarians to gain seats. Senator Erdmann asked if the bylaws amendment passes despite opposition from the College of Fine Arts and Communication faculty, what the chances are that librarians would be elected if they ran for office to represent that college. Dr. Thompson responded that Fine Arts and Communication has historically had a difficult time filling vacancies for service, so passing the bylaws amendment might address this problem. He said the Library felt moving representation from COAS to COFAC might be a very elegant solution to several issues. Senator Blackinton remarked she feels the concern for her college is that smaller departments, such as Theatre, might not be able to get representation on committees if competing with library faculty as well. She said the concerns also exist in regards to Library interests not being representative of Fine Arts and Communication interests. Senator Pfafman pointed out University Libraries is clearly identified in the Senate Constitution, and she questions the ethics of systematically, procedurally excluding their voice when it seems to be clear that University Libraries was intended to be part of the process. She said while she feels a strong obligation to represent the feelings of her department and her college, she has strong concerns about the ethics of the situation. Senator Deitz stated if the rationale behind the bylaws amendment is in what unit it would be easiest for librarians to get elected, that seems to indicate there is some procedural intent to exclude their voice from the Senate table. In terms of the different points of access for designated and at-large positions, she asked when the last time was that a librarian was able to earn a seat. Dr. Thompson responded that occurred four years ago. Senator Deitz questioned whether that constitutes a systematic, procedural shut-out. Dr. Thompson stated librarians are at a disadvantage by not being physically located in a building with many other faculty from Arts and Sciences who might see and vote for them. Senator Deitz noted that an at-large seat should be the most difficult to achieve because there is no home field, or college, advantage. University Libraries Dean Phyllis Self told senators she has worked at four prestigious institutions and at all of them libraries have had representation on their faculty senates. Dean Self was shocked that 鶹s Library did not have its own Senate seat. She feels the best solution would be for Faculty Senate to designate a seat for the Library since they represent the University in all discussions and have one of the largest University budgets. SENATOR MELOY CALLED THE QUESTION NO OBJECTIONS BYLAWS AMENDMENT FAILED 2 YES 11 NO 6 AB V. New Business None Motion: To adjourn (Brice) The Faculty Senate adjourned at 5:53 p.m. Gordon Pettit, Senate Secretary Annette Hamm, Faculty Senate Recording Secretary     PAGE  PAGE 12 3ABKUZ\`fs   ׃xmeZOhChPCJaJhCh$ CJaJhHCJaJhChHCJaJhCh@_CJaJhCh11CJaJhCh75>*CJaJhCh7#CJaJhCh^CJaJhChF|56CJaJhH56CJaJhCh76CJaJhCh75CJaJhCh#CJaJhCh7CJaJ hCh7B[\f    ^ `@&$a$$@&a$@&   ( 4 H ] v       G W z 꾳ߨߒ߆~߆~s~h~h~]hhChICJaJhCh11CJaJhChrOCJaJhHCJaJhCh75CJaJhChxCJaJhChuuCJaJhChPCJaJhChF|CJaJhCh#CJaJhChzCJaJhCh\@CJaJhCh7CJaJhCh$ CJaJhCh{%CJaJ#  ' 4 P d   }t}h]RhChCJaJhChCJaJhCh{.>*CJaJhH5CJaJhCh75CJaJhChPoCJaJhChC)CJaJhCh@_CJaJhChJCJaJhCh7>*CJaJhCh7CJaJhCh{%CJaJhChOACJaJhCh11CJaJhHCJaJhChCJaJ  ( ) K L a b   = _`0Tp@ P !$`'0*-/2p5@8;=@CPF I@ ^@ `gd7 ' / J T ` d e h t     "|Z  a謡~~vnnvnnnhZCJaJhRCJaJh6CJaJhcCJaJh?`CJaJhCh}CJaJhCh7CJaJhCh7>*CJaJhChsNCJaJhsNhsN>*CJaJhB-KCJaJhsN>*CJaJhsNCJaJhChB-KCJaJhChB-K>*CJaJ(  bf< \`0TpP !$`'0*-/2p5@8;=@CPF I`^``gdZOH< \`0TpP !$`'0*-/2p5@8;=@CPF I`^``gdsN abfghjBCDEFH[\ɽwlaVVJ?hCh1pCJaJhChGx>*CJaJhChGxCJaJhCh:CJaJhChCJaJhkCJaJhCJaJhCJaJhChyCJaJhChs'CJaJhChN >*䴳C7>*䴳C>*䴳C7䴳C-䴳Cʼ䴳C#䴳CZ䴳< \`0TpP !$`'0*-/2p5@8;=@CPF I`^``gd< \`0TpP !$`'0*-/2p5@8;=@CPF I`^``gd]G2 Y`0TP !$`'0*-/2p5@8;=@CPF IgdFCD\]stTU!!##%%p^pgdap^pgdA p0^p`0gd"hgdIgd8< \`0TpP !$`'0*-/2p5@8;=@CPF I`^``gd:\]`rsa \BGSUqsy}Wi<Lp . ; [ { "!*!-!!!!!!!!#$ξξξζƶƾh oTCJaJhc_CJaJh5lCJaJhACJaJhaCJaJhcCJaJh< CJaJh"hCJaJh< h< >*CJaJhCh?`CJaJhCh( qCJaJ>$%%%%)***[*]*****p++++,,,,,,,,,,,-(-,-M-R-.....J////0w0x03ļļļ𬼬شyyh0yCJaJh.*CJaJh"CJaJhTz:CJaJh?CJaJh0yhY'CJaJh0xCJaJhY'CJaJhkCJaJh CJaJh5lh5l>*CJaJh5lCJaJhulCJaJhc_CJaJh oTCJaJhACJaJ/%((* *\*]*..w0x092:23377==??:A;ABB p0^p`0gd"h p]^pgdTz:p^pgd gd5lp^pgda3,34'5}566;6<667757I77728)9,999999::::::::;;;;8=9===A>??9A:ABBB̴̬جؙ{hChB_CJaJhCh"hCJaJh?`CJaJh"hCJaJh'!yh'!yCJaJhH3CJaJh hTz:0JCJaJhTz:hTz:CJaJjhTz:CJUaJh'!yCJaJh{ CJaJh#2CJaJh.*CJaJhTz:CJaJ/BBB'C(C[CtCuCCCCCCCDD/D0DLDMDDDD gd=* gd"h gdrb p0^p`0gd: p0^p`0gd"hBC%C'C)C,CZC[CvCwCxCyCzCCCCCCCD3DLDQDDDDDDǼwkk`XLhehH3>*䴳"䴳CC䴳335Cm䴳3䴳33>*䴳ܱ䴳Cܰ䴳C䴳C7䴳C䴳C7>*䴳Cڳ䴳C۴䴳C7>*䴳C7䴳DDDE;*CJaJhH3hH3>*CJaJhH3CJaJhbhbCJaJhCJaJhBwiCJaJh*CJaJh]8`CJaJH[ ] ]X]-_._aadd/g0gagbg gdV ; & F gdV ; @ ^@ gd`Y gd & F gd @ ^@ gd & F gd gd @ ^@ gd p^pgd W]X]],_-_._n_u__``9aEafaiaaaaabb]c^c_cjc}cccd?ddddd#e'eeemfrfϖ{{{{r{rd{h`Yh`Y6CJ\aJhcuCJ\aJhCJ\aJh0DqCJ\aJh`YCJ\aJh`Yh6CJ\aJhCJ\aJhCJ\aJh6CJ\aJh`Yh6CJ\aJhCJ\aJhh^CJ\aJhh6CJ\aJhh4+6CJ\aJ'rfsfff.gbggggChhhhhh#i%i>j?j@jqjsjjjjkkkkkkl-llmmmmmmnn n*n0n9n;n@nKn˽ֲ˽ֲ֧˽ֽֽ֧˽zzh^CJ\aJh'RCJ\aJh#XCJ\aJh CJ\aJh[CJ\aJh0Dq6CJ\aJh[6CJ\aJh[h[6CJ\aJhV ;6CJ\aJh[hV ;6CJ\aJhV ;CJ\aJhCJ\aJh0DqCJ\aJ0bggghh?j@jkkppMtNtzz||||~~ @ ^@ gd`Y p^pgd gd[ @ ^@ gd[ & F gdV ;KnLn_nnnn ooooooop ppp>ppppeq=rErsssss>tEtLtMtu uuiu~uvvvvvwwwxxxxyyɷҷh=UCJ\aJhz-CJ\aJhCJ\aJhG2CJ\aJh CJ\aJhFICJ\aJh0DqCJ\aJhgCJ\aJhslLCJ\aJh@CJ\aJh'RCJ\aJh^CJ\aJhCJ\aJ3yyz!zfzlzzz|||}~~~~~~~~~qv0STĻyme]U]L]h B5CJaJhCJaJh BCJaJhdTCJaJhh>*CJaJhCJaJhCh=*CJaJhChZOH>*CJaJhChZOHCJaJhCh`YCJ\aJhh,CJ\aJhJ CJ\aJh0 CJ\aJh,h,5CJ\aJhFICJ\aJhCJ\aJh=UCJ\aJh,CJ\aJ~~~~~/0TTkl%op ^ gdPK & FgdPK ^`gdPKpdd[$\$]^pgd' ^gd B gd"h gdZOHTTjklopdiˌV͐ݐ0almWXY:FŽűʼnyyqqqqqiqiaihdCJaJhCJaJh]TCJaJh>.CJaJhCJaJhjDCJaJhh>*CJaJhh>*CJaJhCJaJh> ]h> ]5CJaJh BCJaJh> ]CJaJ hPKhPKhPKhPK5CJaJh'5CJaJhPKh'5CJaJhPKh'CJaJ&!"deXYfg>? p^pgd> ] gd"h ^gd B%!0efqr؜ܜefwhy۞ݞ<[dä/0Q=>Z@AGZjwh$CJaJh8OCJaJh| CJaJhCCJaJh CJaJhCJaJh CCJaJhGHCJaJhPKCJaJhCJaJhdCJaJBЬ$%)67I3@ >¶{phpap hCh7h"hCJaJhCh7CJaJhCh75CJaJh"h5CJaJh"h hChe>yhCh9>* hCh9hCh 'y5CJaJh8Oh1"m5CJaJh1"m5CJaJh8O5CJaJh8Oh8O5CJaJh1"mCJaJh$CJaJh| CJaJh8OCJaJ"KLM & F p@ P^`P & F@& & F, MP !$`'0*-/2p5@8;=@CPF Igd6@ & Fgd9 gdks p^pgd> ]>?@BR_ah²òIJƲDzͲβвѲҲԲղֲùh$0JmHnHuh4 h40Jjh40JUh$jh$UhChc}jCJaJhChReCJaJhCJaJhCh7CJaJh CJaJ MrxIJŲƲҲӲԲղֲ&`#$! & F  p@ `$P@&^`Pgdc}j & F p@ P@&^`P5 01h:p'/ =!8"8#$h% ^% 2 0@P`p2( 0@P`p 0@P`p 0@P`p 0@P`p 0@P`p 0@P`p8XV~_HmH nH sH tH @`@ NormalCJ_HaJmH sH tH PP  Heading 1$ & F @& >*CJaJRR  Heading 2$ & F@&^5CJ\aJHH  Heading 3$ & F@& >*CJaJJJ  Heading 4$ & F@&5CJ\aJZZ  Heading 5$ & F@&]^5CJ\aJDA`D Default Paragraph FontViV  Table Normal :V 44 la (k (No List X/X Level 17$8$H$^OJQJ_HaJmH sH tH X/X Level 4@ 7$8$H$^@ OJQJ_HaJmH sH tH X/X Level 3p7$8$H$^pOJQJ_HaJmH sH tH X/"X Level 57$8$H$^OJQJ_HaJmH sH tH XC2X Body Text Indent ^ >*CJaJ6BB6 Body TextCJaJ4 @R4 Footer  !.)@a. Page NumberXR@rX Body Text Indent 2 & F^CJaJ6U@6 Hyperlink >*B*phXSX Body Text Indent 3 & F^CJaJB>@B Title$L^La$5CJ\aJFVF FollowedHyperlink >*B* phZYZ  Document Map-D M CJOJQJ^JaJtN1t Body Text First Indent 2 hx^h` >*CJaJ@@ WP9_Title $1$a$5aJh^h Normal (Web)&ddd[$\$]^CJOJQJaJ*W* Strong5\66 level1!dd[$\$H"H  Balloon Text"CJOJQJ^JaJ$1$ X7objectfBf 6 List Paragraph$d^m$CJOJPJQJ^JaJPK![Content_Types].xmlj0Eжr(΢Iw},-j4 wP-t#bΙ{UTU^hd}㨫)*1P' ^W0)T9<l#$yi};~@(Hu* Dנz/0ǰ $ X3aZ,D0j~3߶b~i>3\`?/[G\!-Rk.sԻ..a濭?PK!֧6 _rels/.relsj0 }Q%v/C/}(h"O = C?hv=Ʌ%[xp{۵_Pѣ<1H0ORBdJE4b$q_6LR7`0̞O,En7Lib/SeеPK!kytheme/theme/themeManager.xml M @}w7c(EbˮCAǠҟ7՛K Y, e.|,H,lxɴIsQ}#Ր ֵ+!,^$j=GW)E+& 8PK!Ptheme/theme/theme1.xmlYOo6w toc'vuر-MniP@I}úama[إ4:lЯGRX^6؊>$ !)O^rC$y@/yH*񄴽)޵߻UDb`}"qۋJחX^)I`nEp)liV[]1M<OP6r=zgbIguSebORD۫qu gZo~ٺlAplxpT0+[}`jzAV2Fi@qv֬5\|ʜ̭NleXdsjcs7f W+Ն7`g ȘJj|h(KD- dXiJ؇(x$( :;˹! I_TS 1?E??ZBΪmU/?~xY'y5g&΋/ɋ>GMGeD3Vq%'#q$8K)fw9:ĵ x}rxwr:\TZaG*y8IjbRc|XŻǿI u3KGnD1NIBs RuK>V.EL+M2#'fi ~V vl{u8zH *:(W☕ ~JTe\O*tHGHY}KNP*ݾ˦TѼ9/#A7qZ$*c?qUnwN%Oi4 =3ڗP 1Pm \\9Mؓ2aD];Yt\[x]}Wr|]g- eW )6-rCSj id DЇAΜIqbJ#x꺃 6k#ASh&ʌt(Q%p%m&]caSl=X\P1Mh9MVdDAaVB[݈fJíP|8 քAV^f Hn- "d>znNJ ة>b&2vKyϼD:,AGm\nziÙ.uχYC6OMf3or$5NHT[XF64T,ќM0E)`#5XY`פ;%1U٥m;R>QD DcpU'&LE/pm%]8firS4d 7y\`JnίI R3U~7+׸#m qBiDi*L69mY&iHE=(K&N!V.KeLDĕ{D vEꦚdeNƟe(MN9ߜR6&3(a/DUz<{ˊYȳV)9Z[4^n5!J?Q3eBoCM m<.vpIYfZY_p[=al-Y}Nc͙ŋ4vfavl'SA8|*u{-ߟ0%M07%<ҍPK! ѐ'theme/theme/_rels/themeManager.xml.relsM 0wooӺ&݈Э5 6?$Q ,.aic21h:qm@RN;d`o7gK(M&$R(.1r'JЊT8V"AȻHu}|$b{P8g/]QAsم(#L[PK-![Content_Types].xmlPK-!֧6 +_rels/.relsPK-!kytheme/theme/themeManager.xmlPK-!Ptheme/theme/theme1.xmlPK-! ѐ' theme/theme/_rels/themeManager.xml.relsPK] ֪  %%%( a\$3BDWW]rfKnyT>ֲZ\]_adegiklnoqrtvwy  fC%BDH[bg~Mֲ[^`bcfhjmpsuxz223֪X !(!!8@0(  B S  ?KO`j_j,2 %%U2[24:<:ӄ؄;@Ԫת ""**23;;FGOOmmpp}}%~(~~~EQDžt{ÜΜ˩ԩԪת33333333333333333 ""p####$$$$$%(%,%&&&&v(w(o/o/23HSHSSSSSSSTT UUUUXUXUnWuWXX9YEYaYaYfYiYYYYZ][^[_[j[[[\\#]']]]]]q^q^r^s^^^``qbsbjcjcccd-dQdQdzezeee=jEjkkkk>lElm mmmim~mooooppppfrlrqwvw݈0alm%--!00efqrؔܔwhyۖݖ[dܘ˜CC@AGZjw$%)67I3@Ԫת ""p####$$$$$%(%,%&&&&v(w(o/o/23HSHSSSSSSSTT UUUUXUXUnWuWXX9YEYaYaYfYiYYYYZ][^[_[j[[[\\#]']]]]]q^q^r^s^^^``qbsbjcjcccd-dQdQdzezeee=jEjkkkk>lElm mmmim~mooooppppfrlrqwvw݈0alm%--!00efqrؔܔwhyۖݖ[dܘ˜CC@AGZjw$%)67I3@hת]FRX6 k#tP|<dGj*9J'Da$\Tr#%veV'0]:C s+t!F...tjf6_ u9@ \a N tcP OL pR75s(hkEvT0cxHe.%{i5h^`OJQJo(hHhpp^p`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh@ @ ^@ `OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHhPP^P`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh  ^ `OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHhp^p`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh@ ^@ `OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHhP^P`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh ^ `OJQJo(hHh@ ^@ `OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHohP^P`OJQJo(hHh ^ `OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh!^!`OJQJo(hHhpp^p`OJQJo(hHh@ @ ^@ `OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHhPP^P`OJQJo(hHh  ^ `OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHhp^p`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh@ ^@ `OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHhP^P`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh ^ `OJQJo(hH0^`0o(.p0p^p`0o(. L ^ `L.  ^ `.xx^x`.HLH^H`L.^`.^`.L^`L.h p^p`hH.h @ ^@ `hH.h L^`LhH.h ^`hH.h ^`hH.h L^`LhH.h P^P`hH.h  ^ `hH.h L^`LhH.h^`OJQJo(hHhpp^p`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh@ @ ^@ `OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHhPP^P`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh  ^ `OJQJo(hHh@ ^@ `OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHohP^P`OJQJo(hHh ^ `OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh!^!`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHhpp^p`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh@ @ ^@ `OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHhPP^P`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh  ^ `OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHhP^P`OJQJo(hHh ^ `OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh!^!`OJQJo(hHh$^$`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh`'^`'`OJQJo(hH ^ `o(.  ^ `hH. xL^x`LhH. H^H`hH. ^`hH. L^`LhH. ^`hH. ^`hH. X L^X `LhH. ^ `OJPJQJ^Jo(- ^ `OJQJ^Jo(hHox^x`OJQJo(hHH^H`OJQJo(hH^`OJQJ^Jo(hHo^`OJQJo(hH^`OJQJo(hH^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoX ^X `OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHhpp^p`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh@ @ ^@ `OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHhPP^P`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh  ^ `OJQJo(hHh@ ^@ `OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHohP^P`OJQJo(hHh ^ `OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh!^!`OJQJo(hHh pp^p`hH.h @ @ ^@ `hH.h L^`LhH.h ^`hH.h ^`hH.h L^`LhH.h PP^P`hH.h   ^ `hH.h L^`LhH.h $ $ ^$ `hH.h   ^ `hH.h L^`LhH.h ^`hH.h dd^d`hH.h 4L4^4`LhH.h ^`hH.h ^`hH.h L^`LhH. ^ `OJPJQJ^Jo(- ^ `OJQJ^Jo(o x^x`OJQJo( H^H`OJQJo(^`OJQJ^Jo(o ^`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(^`OJQJ^Jo(o X ^X `OJQJo(h$ $ ^$ `OJQJo(hHh  ^ `OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHhdd^d`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh44^4`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh ^ `OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHhX^X`OJQJo(hHh(^(`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHohh^h`OJQJo(hH88^8`o(.^`. L ^ `L.  ^ `.xx^x`.HLH^H`L.^`.^`.L^`L.h@ ^@ `OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHohP^P`OJQJo(hHh ^ `OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh!^!`OJQJo(hHhhh^h`OJQJo(hHh88^8`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh  ^ `OJQJo(hHh  ^ `OJQJ^Jo(hHohxx^x`OJQJo(hHhHH^H`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh@ @ ^@ `OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHohPP^P`OJQJo(hHh  ^ `OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh!!^!`OJQJo(hHh\ \ ^\ `OJQJo(hHh,,^,`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHohll^l`OJQJo(hHh<<^<`OJQJo(hHh ! !^ !`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh##^#`OJQJo(hHL p'Da$]<\a[.%{kEvF..0Pw0K0cxV' u9*XnNjf6tcr#%k#5s s+p;])9@                                                                                          ̓N         zΎ                                            vb                                                              $#x@ *Q7=7Tyw5nII m,W}YAc&p{2rFz{/55GZgw0&PM^VP" $P r < $  0 3 "A Q hr Iy | F O IV w { ?( { V& f& 2P `_ (h +z #d%BJYTZ _"yJ*r 9J=\T^ z?/dDx>KTq|" FuuMY  "9%GMmtZwH$b*frv/!K0M NanO$hRj~i'Icu8g`pzCRTdq]Peq&BWk0xz*119Gkm  7 D xo K!!?5!k!v"m "" "#a8#8#A#SE#G#RU#-y#D$;S$jj$%% %>1%%O%`%a%q%x%&,&4&x&#'3'2'\'k's'w'''"<(\(P|(})5)A)C)~m)*.*/*`*+++"+$,+.+T+qU+iy+4+',PL,u\,.Z.We.kf.q.Bu.bx./A/d/y/S 0 0J0t1vH1#2L 2)62W<2'y2H3P3]3b3l 4y45-B5 6 666&6ie6z6|7#7(7X7Zk7pr78;8X8|8v29b9Id9 :U:C.:<:@:Tz:;q;V ;D;Y;;_<ly<~<"==== >(>g>?/?YN?\?c?Zy?,~?+@6@@L@qA#A,ACAAMA B&PBGZB[BjuB~zBCdC<+C>CnPC'bC%fC/lC DH D8VD)gDjDEo EaEjbEYFO F9F3FOHFbFEcG]fG gGiGjGGHZOHII2IP5IFIJ*J0JBJeJmJ*KB-KGK&L|.LLL)_LslLw{LMM)My?Md|M N N4NsNOnO^qOrO]P P2PSLP)QE&Q:QAQMQRPQaQzQH&R'ReMRqMRZmRzRSaJS\S T T9T+=TKVT]T oTUUUhU=U|YUiUapUV2VvVGWC=W??W XXXcX\Y#YKY#QY`YrY Z)Z1Z*wZzZp[[[-[\,\Z9\;\W;\S\]\n\|\> ] "]C]*I]_]e]n ^(^P]^v_}_@_B_`]8`?`.L`GZ`"]`q` a@a:alalzaQbbNbIHbdbfbob$cPgcAd*bdhd3jdPe,e6eFeRe_e;fVf gwg"hjoPjkjc}jF~j k-;k!DkckruklHlf:lUlZlMmlul1"mO*m^mym` nn0n>nknn$o,ohDoPo;Vooo2ro1p];p*Sp1epFrp( qq0Dq/KqVqjqlqrprzrG?r8ss,s=tt"tt'tTBtHt\t^tbt uU$uvveuvQ w ww"JwyRw0]wDxGxSIxexy y'!y 'ye>yhy zrzzJzozwzC {z.{;A{3M{+[{c{3|F||,}7}i`}@t} ~~*:~!=~u~l|~'j4Bk?<?Y"7;]G=g6V{*:AG}xBOZw^xg -,K8}y7A=QNou'+59J0EY+]lH!X`k&s+G2J*i~=* 39;\]g4u wMc*gmvY|r p5?QijlU{|%2ck` (/5:B 8"Q)Y8OACDO6d,I8O\Paanq:^ #N6\sr i w%c-<@B#Xau'AUdHlp:"0w}xKm0x6 5$2f UA "DQ&{ mIj%zd9:cB0FF^!Hco;LdkTctt .I'R^feb&TEp|D},Is1NVdu >q+B@ILk7{e&4>Temg"J-xp}"=)rbCEJS^ikz4Ofrt|58C rK iU I|=PKlTZb/ G=HfPaJV i%45?a,V<>qN(,?O^d  CRXr*#2}9FH\sd# ,b5n_(3P,$/0:Qb~ (FI{T0 +*,;^plJ"DlHl)nx'jIl805@B,c_aa {#V+54NFeqbvz ![03t5s:FMdr3"*`#y#`5 BWqhr{. O.k/6H?@CpkiZ>7#?(7.7D,O 2d A> SZhyN V&<@$CCaQ0y~W# 0/=[aViH~X6w?FWAdx6 ^_p[t{.L]RT{} +L j177}q)#<@FPNNg-EAjvru&&ChP=\@Ve xxx:Gq  i\cJ<:iOjc)x0 $aEs0u, @$:IT] gJ -;6K\#@~P26#DYopqvvy*4@]JcLP=FwZh.yT 47DKVFanz$N&Jkfw +]4@DMgiks /AMv!u=O5l!m)<EBI[..n3LlmUw<88;aTbfa)dk =&@dTyi.57Jjz4ZIv]\n#=1@INTlo:A_cO{%g(NPT W[r~.:R_1 moy)MD@@@ @@֪H@Unknown G* Times New Roman5Symbol3. * Arial71 Courier5. *aTahoma7.  Verdana7.{ @Calibri?= * Courier New;WingdingsA BCambria Math"1hf*f*fJy6 W5y6 W584dXX 2qHP ?@Z2! xxWESTERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY Annette Hamm Annette Hammp                    Oh+'0 ,8 X d p |WESTERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITYAnnette Hamm Normal.dotmAnnette Hamm74Microsoft Office Word@R@Ф2@1CJU@Ф2 y6՜.+,D՜.+,` hp  鶹 Illinois University5WX WESTERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY Title 8@ _PID_HLINKSAh^hmailto:support@wiu.edu  !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=>?@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_`abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz{}~Root Entry F`PQData |1TableWordDocument 7SummaryInformation(DocumentSummaryInformation8MsoDataStoreP PЎ QRU0SLJMSAH==2P PЎ QItem  PropertiesUCompObj y   F'Microsoft Office Word 97-2003 Document MSWordDocWord.Document.89q