ࡱ> ` 7cbjbj 1[%j j j j j j j ~ ...8..d~ rF$J/J/"l/l/l/l/l/l/EEEEEEE$GhIFj @3l/l/@3@3Fj j l/l/,FR7R7R7@3lj l/j l/ER7@3ER7R7YD|j j El/>/ @dZ.4DEBF0rFDJ06J$EJj E l/60R70t:1l/l/l/FF6dl/l/l/rF@3@3@3@3~ ~ ~ d~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ j j j j j j  WESTERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY Regular Meeting of the FACULTY SENATE Tuesday, 22 February 2005 4:00 p.m. Capitol Rooms - University Union A C T I O N M I N U T E S MEMBERS PRESENT: Mr. Bacon, Mr. Bennett, Mr. Blankenship, Mr. Brice, Mr. Callister, Mr. DeVolder, Mr. Durkin, Mr. Erdmann, Mr. Espahbodi, Ms. Jelatis, Ms. Livingston-Webber, Ms. Mahoney, Mr. Meegan, Mr. Radlo, Ms. Shouse, Ms. Thomas, Mr. Thompson, Ms. Wolf, Ms. Young Ex-officio: Karen Mann, Parliamentarian; Joseph Rallo, Provost MEMBERS ABSENT: Mr. Adkins, Ms. Allen, Ms. McCain GUESTS: Barb Baily, Lori Baker-Sperry, Virginia Boynton, Ken Clontz, Netkal Made Gowda, Greg Hall, W. Buzz Hoon, Jenq-kuen Huang, Inessa Levi, Abdul-Rasheed NaAllah, Steve Rock, Jim Schmidt, Tom Tomlinson, Morris Vos I. Consideration of Minutes 8 February 2005 In item III.B., change reference to Subcommittee Chair Virginia Boynton to read Virginia Jelatis. APPROVED AS CORRECTED II. Announcements Approvals from the Provost 1. Request for New Course ZOOL 325, Vertebrate Evolution, 3 s.h. B. Provosts Report Provost Rallo called the announcement by the Pella Corporation that it will establish a site in Macomb a great town-gown victory. He told senators that there may eventually be as many as 500 jobs as a result of their decision. Provost Rallo announced the architectural renderings for the Quad Cities campus have received formal recommendation and will be available for public viewing by no later than the March Board of Trustees meeting. A senator asked Provost Rallo if the 鶹 administration has prepared any response to the attack on state pensions, but the Provost stated that nothing official has been prepared at this time. C. SGA Report - None Other Announcements 1. Chairperson Blankenship announced that two petitions were received by the extended deadline for the two vacancies on Faculty Senate in fall for the College of Fine Arts and Communication. Nathan Miczo and Richard Ness have been appointed to fill those two positions. In addition, the Senate election for the College of Arts and Sciences has been completed with Bonnie Sonnek chosen to fill that fall vacancy. Chairperson Blankenship reminded senators that the CAGAS Report on a Foreign Language/Cultural Requirement has been posted on the Faculty Senate webpages, along with some of the accompanying documentation. The full report, which is over 100 pages, is available for viewing in the Faculty Senate office. Faculty Senate will sponsor a multicultural forum to be held from 3-4:30 p.m. Wednesday, March 9 in the Union Capitol Rooms. A special invitation will be mailed to interested groups, to include Faculty Development, the Institute for Dealing with Differences, Department Chairs, CCPI, CGE, CAGAS, CIE the First Year Experience Committee and Affirmative Action, as well as emailed to faculty, administrators, and advisors campuswide via telestars. Chairperson Blankenship announced that President Goldfarb has approved the Administrator Emeritus Policy endorsed by Faculty Senate at its last meeting. Faculty Senate will join Faculty Development and UPI in sponsoring a brown-bag discussion on possible cutbacks to the pension fund late next month. Speakers will include representatives from UPI, the University Benefits office, and the State Universities Annuitants Association. Chairperson Blankenship announced that three senators have volunteered to serve on the Ad Hoc Task Force on the Assessment of General Education: Dale Adkins, Steve Bennett, and Bill Thompson. The Executive Committee is still accepting nominations for three additional faculty members with assessment experience to serve. The Council on General Education has appointed Virginia Boynton, Paige Intrieri, and John Chisholm as its representatives to the Task Force. A senator asked Chairperson Blankenship if Faculty Senate could be kept apprised of concerns with the University Teacher Education Committee (UTEC) and its curriculum approval process discussed at the Executive Committee meeting. Chairperson Blankenship said the Executive Committee has written a letter to COEHS Associate Dean Don Nelson, Chair of UTEC, and is gathering information regarding UTECs mandate from the Provosts Office. He said he would report back to senators. III. Reports of Committees and Councils A. Council on Curricular Programs and Instruction (W. Buzz Hoon, Chair) Requests for New Courses a. CHEM 451, Applications of Forensic Chemistry, 3 s.h. b. CHEM 452, Forensic Toxicology and DNA Analysis, 3 s.h. A senator asked if an online component is being considered since the courses are intended to be part of a proposed new major. Provost Rallo stated that the University is desiring to do as much online as is appropriate, but many upper-level Chemistry courses are not appropriate to do online, although in some instances that can be successfully accomplished. NEW CHEMISTRY COURSES APPROVED SPAN 192, Accelerated Elementary Spanish, 4 s.h. Change: Remove the third sentence in the Catalog Description because it is redundant: Development of listening, speaking, reading, and writing skills along with cross-cultural insights and appreciation. NEW COURSE APPROVED WITH CHANGE Request for New Major a. Forensic Chemistry Change: Change references to CHEM 490 in the IBHE New Unit of Instruction document to CHEM 485 or CHEM 490. NEW MAJOR APPROVED WITH CHANGE Writing in the Disciplines (WID) Committee (Greg Hall, Chair) Request for WID Approval a. CHEM 401, Inorganic Chemistry III, 4 s.h. NO OBJECTIONS Council on General Education (Lori Baker-Sperry, Chair) Request for Inclusion in General Education Humanities a. AAS 282, Black Theatre, 3 s.h. AAS 283, African American Folklore, 3 s.h. Dr. Baker-Sperry explained that the two courses are currently listed in the Multicultural General Education category and, if approved, would have multiple Gen Ed listings, as do certain other courses. NO OBJECTIONS Ad Hoc Subcommittee to Examine the Policy for the Hiring of Chairs (Members: Ed Gettinger, Chair, Art; Ken Hawkinson, Chair, Communication; Senators Aimee Shouse, Chair, Subcommittee; James Rabchuk; Darlene Young) Chairperson Blankenship thanked senators and subcommittee members for their hard work on revising the 1973 policy on the hiring of chairs. Senator Thompson pointed out that under discussion of the Periodic Review, it is stated that Each college shall develop, in consultation with its faculty, appropriate procedures which makes this a college-level document rather than a department-level document. He told senators that in the case of the Library, there is a large Civil Service staff, and he wondered if this means that Civil Service employees, in both the Library and in departments, would also need to develop similar procedures. Senator Shouse responded that this language was taken from the original policy. Senator Thompson remarked that if the policy is a college-level document, the deans would be involved in ways that they would not be if it was a department-level document. Senator Thompson also pointed out that there are several references to department in the proposed policy and that if the procedures are to be used by the Library as well, these should be changed to department or unit. A senator pointed out that the proposed policy contains many references to Provost which should be changed to read Academic Vice President. Provost Rallo stated the policy will go a long way toward resolving some current issues in the hiring of chairs at 鶹. He said the policy addresses the two broad issues the nature of the search (internal versus external) and the lack of a policy for the hiring of interim chairs regarding which persons had expressed concern. The proposed policy begins by stating, The chair and the dean recommend the type of search (external or internal) to the Vice President for Academic Affairs who shall, in turn, make a recommendation to the President. One senator wondered if the chair making the recommendation would be the incumbent chair or the interim chair. Another senator stated that a chair who has been removed from the position might have some underlying issues behind his or her recommendation regarding internal or external search. Senator Shouse responded the subcommittee had wished to leave this up to the discretion of the departments. Provost Rallo stated he and the President have voiced the opinion that all of 鶹s searches should be competitive external searches unless there are compelling circumstances for an internal search. Some senators recommended changing the first sentence of the policy to read, The department or unit and the dean recommend in order to eliminate the question of whether an interim or an incumbent chair be involved in the recommendation. Senators discussed at length the question of who comprises voting members of the chair search committee. One senator stated the policy seemed to indicate that search committee membership be restricted only to voting faculty so that students and others would be ineligible to serve as voting members. Senator Shouse indicated a statement in the policy that In the case of departments that share programs with other departments, faculty from those other departments may serve on the Search Committee as ex-officio members addresses this concern in part. Some senators stated that Unit B faculty were considered voting members of search committees in their departments while other senators said the opposite is true. Some senators felt that voting membership needed to be more clearly defined in the policy and not left up to each department or unit. But Senator Shouse stated that may be beyond the purview of this policy. Another senator questioned how closely such procedures can be mandated as University policy before they become intrusive upon departments. Provost Rallo was asked how quickly the proposed policy would take effect once approved. He responded that it is his understanding that there is already University policy that addresses such search questions as strengths/weaknesses versus ranking, etc., and that current policy would be followed until superceded by an approved revision. Parliamentarian Mann stated that if there is no written policy, faculty should not be at risk of violation. SENATOR THOMPSON OBJECTED TO THE REPORT Motion: To restore the subcommittee report to the agenda (Espahbodi/Livingston-Webber) MOTION TO RESTORE APPROVED 15 YES 3 NO 1 AB Senators discussed at further depth whether the chairs hiring policy should clearly define who constitutes a voting member of the search committee. Senator Shouse pointed out that if voting membership is defined in the policy, it would apply to this specific case only and could not be used in other circumstances. One senator noted there seems to be confusion between voting members referred to in this document and voting members of the faculty. Another senator remarked the problem seems to be that many departments do not have clearly established procedures for determining search committee memberships. In response to a comment that the decision regarding voting membership should be faculty driven, one senator pointed out that deans are the supervisors of the chairs and will want to have a strong voice in this process as well. Provost Rallo stated that the group comprising the search committee needs to be more inclusive than exclusive since it is important to engender trust. Motion: To postpone further discussion of this item until the next meeting and in the interim for persons to express their concerns. (DeVolder/Brice) During further discussion following the motion, it was suggested that perhaps the next Senate meeting was too soon to request a revision, and a friendly amendment was proposed and accepted that the subcommittee submit a revised policy proposal to the Executive Committee within two meetings (no later than March 22). MOTION WITH FRIENDLY AMENDMENT APPROVED 16 YES 3 NO 0 AB Council on Admission, Graduation, and Academic Standards (Steve Rock, Chair) Administrative Admissions Policy One senator expressed serious concerns with the apparent lack of transparency discussed at the Executive Committee meeting regarding the fact that most universities conduct administrative admissions but do not openly publish them, thus circumventing the intention of NCAA requirements. Chairperson Blankenship quoted from NCAA Bylaw 14.1.7.1. regarding special admissions: A student-athlete may be admitted under a special exception to the institutions normal admissions if the discretionary authority of the chief executive officer (or designated admissions officer or committee) to grant such exceptions is set forth in an official document published by the university (e.g. Official catalog) that describes the institutions admissions requirements. He stated there may be places in which to publish the administrative admits policy other than the University catalog but where it would still be accessible to persons who would need to know about it, such as faculty, and would still conform to NCAA requirements, which are notoriously open-ended. One senator agreed that if the administrative admits policy is advertised in the catalog, it will greatly increase the pressure from parents, students, and others to engage in this type of appeal, which would be chaos for CAGAS because they would hear every appeal first. Another senator, however, called publishing the policy in a place that is not accessible to students hiding in plain sight and called it creepy and weird that there would be one admissions policy that is not intended for students while all others are. A senator disagreed, stating that the policy would not need to be published for students since they are not the ones that can appeal: it would need to be published for those persons who can submit an appeal for an administrative admit faculty, staff, administrators, and Board of Trustees members. A question was asked regarding the statement, Such request shall be in writing and indicate the benefit to the university of admitting the student. The senator questioned what benefits the student could reference other than monetary or political ones. CAGAS Chair Steve Rock responded the student could have a particular talent that is not indicated on transcripts and CAGAS would want to know that. Dr. Rock told senators that CAGAS has a subcommittee that looks at students on the bubble of being admitted and considers any extenuating circumstances that might affect that decision, so that mechanism is already in place. He stated the purpose of the Administrative Admissions Policy was to address the fact that these types of admissions were being conducted but CAGAS and others were unaware that they were happening and there was no policy to limit these types of admissions in any way. SENATOR ESPAHBODI OBJECTED TO THE REPORT Motion: To restore the report to the agenda (Meegan/Livingston-Webber) MOTION TO RESTORE APPROVED 16 YES 2 NO 0 AB A senator asked why CAGAS has recommended limiting administrative admits to five per year. Dr. Rock responded that one of 鶹s sister institutions place a one percent cap on these types of admissions, which amounts to about 18 students per year. In practice, however, this university and several other state universities typically do not admit more than five students per year in this manner. Since CAGAS wished to significantly limit administrative admissions and to be consistent with practices at other state universities, Dr. Rock explained, they recommended that limit. In response to a question as to how many administrative admits 鶹 has had in past years, Dr. Rock said these have been done on an ad hoc basis so no official figures are available. Senator Thompson requested that CAGAS be asked to report to Faculty Senate yearly on the academic progress of those students admitted to 鶹 as administrative admits. Dr. Rock stated that CAGAS would be happy to do so if directed by Senate. Friendly Amendment: That it be added to point #5 of the CAGAS recommendation that information on the progress of students admitted through administrative admits be reported to the Executive Committee of the Faculty Senate. (Meegan/Thompson) Friendly Amendment: That the phrase such as the university catalog be removed from the sentence, To insure fairness and equal access to all student applicants, it is further recommended that the policy suggested below should be codified in some sort of publicly available university document, such as the university catalog. FRIENDLY AMENDMENTS APPROVED 14 YES 2 NO 3 AB ADMINISTRATIVE ADMITS POLICY APPROVED 16 YES 1 NO 2 AB Foreign Language/Cultural Requirement Preliminary Report Chairperson Blankenship reminded senators that the document being considered is a preliminary report only. Dr. Rock pointed out to senators that the SGA resolution included in their packets, recommending that the foreign language/cultural requirement be studied, is not part of the CAGAS report. In response to a question, Dr. Rock stated CAGAS did not take a position on whether an admissions, graduation, or General Education requirement would be better if adopted since the Council was asked only to consider the feasibility of implementation and to document the three options. Dr. Rock said CAGAS hopes Faculty Senate indicates its preference of a particular track to pursue at which time CAGAS can look more fully at the ramifications of that specific implementation process. A senator asked if CAGAS knew how many students would not come to 鶹 if a foreign language/culture admissions requirement were implemented. Dr. Rock responded that CAGAS did not survey students so does not know the ramifications of this possibility. He noted that the Agriculture department provided an anecdotal survey of one of their classes in response to this question, the results of which are posted on the Senates webpages. He stated the Director of Admissions does feel there would be some decrease in applications if such an admissions requirement were mandated, although Dr. Rock added that would not necessarily be entirely negative if it meant that 鶹 would draw a better cohort of students. Provost Rallo stated the flip side of the question is how many students is 鶹 losing because the institution does not have some sort of foreign language/cultural requirement. He said parents often ask why 鶹 does not have this sort of requirement when other institutions do. The Provost said he feels all students at 鶹 should be exposed to some sort of global experience and senators should ask themselves what is the best way that students can obtain this experience. He said this should not involve simply a menu of courses but exposure to the issues that students will be involved in when they leave the university. Center for International Studies Director Tom Tomlinson told senators that consultant Steve Sacco has said that 鶹 could be positioned to do an international experience of some sort across the board and that some things could be developed in each department with some creative planning. Dr. Tomlinson stated a lot of departments are already moving in this direction and doing these types of things but they are not specifically identified. He added that the Senates Council for International Education is also eager to get involved in these types of issues and planning. One senator stated the idea of global awareness is an idea that he could support. He added that his department is doing neat things already with global awareness, but a two-year foreign language requirement does not fit all departments across the board and does not appear to work on a university level. NO OBJECTIONS TO THE REPORT Senator Thompson thanked CAGAS for an astonishing amount of work on the report, adding that he could see very clearly what the problems might be for each of the possible implementation considerations. Provost Rallo was asked how soon a foreign language/cultural requirement would be implemented if approved. He responded the goal is to graduate students that can succeed, and it is this concern that is foremost right now. He added a decision should be made sooner rather than later, but there is no need to shove something through. A senator asked if Provost Rallo thought that a global awareness requirement would satisfy parents. The Provost answered that parents are not looking for a specific type of requirement: they just want to see that 鶹 has something that they are asking their students to go through and experience in this regard. Motion: That the Senate expand beyond a purely foreign language requirement to a more encompassing type of requirement. (Bacon/DeVolder) Friendly Amendment: That Senate expand beyond a purely foreign language requirement to a foreign language/global issues requirement. (Bacon) One senator stated she did not feel comfortable eliminating culture from the rubric. Friendly Amendment: That Faculty Senate ask CAGAS and CIE to develop a proposal. (Bacon) A senator stated that persons should be added who really want to develop such a proposal because it will impact all multicultural and cross-cultural courses at 鶹. Friendly Amendment: That Faculty Senate ask CAGAS, CGE, and CIE to develop a proposal (Blankenship) One senator suggested that a subcommittee could be established with three members from each of the councils rather than getting the entire three councils involved. Senator DeVolder stated he does not feel comfortable sending the request back to CAGAS with the only change being that the requirement not be just foreign language. The friendly amendments regarding requesting a proposal from CAGAS, CGE, and CIE were accepted by Senator Bacon but denied by Senator DeVolder so they were removed from the original motion. ORIGINAL MOTION WITH FIRST FRIENDLY AMENDMENT APPROVED 17 YES 2 NO 0 AB Motion: For the Executive Committee to develop a charge and a recommendation as to which committees should be directed to develop the proposal. (Bacon/Brice) MOTION APPROVED 19 YES 0 NO 0 AB Motion: That CAGAS no longer consider an admissions requirement. (Bennett/Espahbodi) A senator stated that it should not be assumed that the directive will go back to CAGAS. A friendly amendment that, instead of specifically CAGAS, the Senate no longer consider a new admissions requirement within the context of this recommendation was accepted by Senators Bennett and Espahbodi. MOTION APPROVED WITH FRIENDLY AMENDMENT 15 YES 2 NO 2 AB Committee on Committees (Darlene Young, Chair) STRATEGIC PLAN IMPLEMENTATION TEAMS Encourage Student Success/Increase Retention and Graduation Rates B. J. Lee, Computer Science There were no other nominations. B. J. Lee was appointed by acclamation. IV. Old Business - None V. New Business - None Motion: To adjourn (Brice/Jelatis) The Faculty Senate adjourned at 5:54 p.m. Julie Mahoney, Secretary Annette Hamm Faculty Senate Recording Secretary     PAGE  PAGE 8 3ABJ[  % -   ! 1 2 3 HUx%.EF=[hn5CJ\ hnCJhn5CJ\aJhnCJaJ hn>*hn>*CJaJh`.CJaJhn5>*CJ\aJhn56CJ\]aJhn6CJ]aJhn5CJ\aJhnCJaJhn7B\]g % &  0 1  @&^ `  @&^ `  ^ `@&$a$$@&a$@&c6c   2 3   xy & F p0^p`0  & F^ & F`^ & F^ & F & Fkl !/EF_9:p^p^ & F ]^ ]^ & F] & F & F^:\]]^9:exy & F ^ & F p@&^p p^p ^ & F@&^^ & Fp^p@&[^89:e^km00'1X1:5A5a6s6t6 77M777BBBBCICCGWG6HJHIII*JV%V|YYZZ_Z}ZZ[[\\"\]^K_q_r_z_$`6`\```2acaaa bb3b7bCbOb[bdbmbc hn>*hnhn>*CJaJhn5CJ\aJhnCJaJV  Dg\]lm & F^@&^  p^p ^ & F  & F  ^ & F  @&^ ^D E $$&&**..0000$1%1X1Y195:55577M7@&@&^^M7N777777:??BBBBCCHCICKFLFBGCG5H6HI @&^`p@&^pp^p & F & F^IIIIII*J+JVKWK?M@MPPRRTTVV$V%VVV{Y|YZ & F^p@&^pp^pZZZZZZE[F[[[P\Q\]]\^]^^^J_K_q_r___!`"```-ap@&^pp^p-a2a3aKabacaaaaaaa2b3bKbLbcbdbbbbb & F & F@&^ & F @&]^ ]^^ & Fp^pp@&^pbbbbbbccccccccc&c'c(c&`#$ & F p@ @&^` & F p@ P@&^`P & F p@ P^`P & Fccccccccccc$c%c&c(c)c/c0c1c2c3c6c7ch`.0JmHnHu hn0Jjhn0JUhnjhnU hnCJ(c3c4c5c6c7c&`#$/ 01h/ =!"#$h% @@@ NormalCJ_HaJmH sH tH P@P Heading 1$ & F @& >*CJaJR@R Heading 2$ & F@&^5CJ\aJH@H Heading 3$ & F@& >*CJaJJ@J Heading 4$ & F@&5CJ\aJZ@Z Heading 5$ & F@&]^5CJ\aJDA@D Default Paragraph FontVi@V  Table Normal :V 44 la (k@(No List XOX Level 17$8$H$^OJQJ_HaJmH sH tH XOX Level 4@ 7$8$H$^@ OJQJ_HaJmH sH tH XOX Level 3p7$8$H$^pOJQJ_HaJmH sH tH XO"X Level 57$8$H$^OJQJ_HaJmH sH tH XC@2X Body Text Indent ^ >*CJaJ6B@B6 Body TextCJaJ4 @R4 Footer  !.)@a. Page NumberXR@rX Body Text Indent 2 & F^CJaJ6U@6 Hyperlink >*B*phXS@X Body Text Indent 3 & F^CJaJB>@B Title$L^La$5CJ\aJFV@F FollowedHyperlink >*B* phZYZ  Document Map-D M CJOJQJ^JaJ7[B\]g%&0123xy [[[[[8[0000B000gh0g0g0g0g0g0g00000000100 0 0 000 000000000000 0000 0y0 y00y00y00y00y00TB\]g%&0123xy k l   ! /EF_9:\]]^9:exy  Dg\]lmDE""&&(((($)%)X)Y)9-:---//M/N//////277::::;;H;I;K>L>B?C?5@6@AAAAAA*B+BVCWC?E@EHHJJLLNN$N%NNN{Q|QRRRRRRESFSSSPTQTUU\V]VVVJWKWqWrWWW!X"XXX-Y2Y3YKYbYcYYYYYYY2Z3ZKZLZcZdZZZZZZZZZZ[[[[[&['[([3[4[5[8[0H000B000g0g0g0g0g0g0g0000000000 0 0 000 000000000000 0000 00 00 00 00 00 0 0 0 0000 00000000# 0#0#0#0#00G 0G0G0G0G0G00 000 0#0000 000 00 000000F 0F0F0F0F0F0F0F0F0F0F0F0F0F0F0F00(00(00)0)0)0)0)0)0)00. 0.0.0. 07/.0.0.0.0.0.0.00:00:00:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:00iA00A 07/A0A0A0A0A0A0A0A0A0A0A0A0A0A00M0M0M0M0M0M0M0M0M00}R0}R0}R0}R0}R0}R0}R0}R0}R0}R0}R0}R0}R0}R0}R004W04W04W04W04W04W04W000Y 0Y0000000000 0000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00{00{00{00{00{00y00y00@0@0y00 00 $$$'[c7c28@ :M7IZ-ab(c7c35679:;<=>?A6c4  '!!*C<=+CW",C6"-C#.C/C|D0C 41C2Ce3C|4C"5Ck"6C7Cqq|8[     x""8[  h*urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttagsCity0http://www.5iamas-microsoft-com:office:smarttagsV*urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttagsplacehttp://www.5iantlavalamp.com/= *urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags PlaceName= *urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags PlaceTypeV*urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags PersonNamehttp://www.microsoft.com io   5<flrw}^ g ~  ##&&)):;$@*@JJZZ[[[[[[[[[[[[5[8[;B_fzEKot$%9)E)./:/77(;4;AAAA&R,RSSTTRW^WqXyXYY[[[[[[[[[[[[5[8[333333333333333333333333LMz66;;]VfVmVV[[[[[[[[[[[[[%[([2[8[[[[[[[[[[[[[5[8[$(J P"bZ{'Da$\T5=t4Z6\jEL pR70^`0>*o(.^`o(. L ^ `L.  ^ `.xx^x`.HLH^H`L.^`.^`.L^`L.0^`0o(.p0p^p`0o(. 0 ^ `0o(.  ^ `.xx^x`.HLH^H`L.^`.^`.L^`L.0^`0o(.p0p^p`0o(. L ^ `L.  ^ `.xx^x`.HLH^H`L.^`.^`.L^`L.pp^p`o(.@ @ ^@ `.L^`L.^`.^`.L^`L.PP^P`.  ^ `.L^`L.pp^p`o(.@ @ ^@ `.L^`L.^`.^`.L^`L.PP^P`.  ^ `.L^`L.88^8`o(.^`. L ^ `L.  ^ `.xx^x`.HLH^H`L.^`.^`.L^`L.L p'Da$ P"$4Z6\5=ɀ;"e       &2JD]L      Tqi       "\                \O         `.n@io7[@UnknownGz Times New Roman5Symbol3& z Arial71 Courier5& zaTahoma"1hJfvFvF zM. zM.$4dZZ 2AHP?`.2WESTERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY Annette Hamm Annette Hamm$      Oh+'0 ,8 X d p |WESTERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITYAnnette Hamm Normal.dotAnnette Hamm4Microsoft Office Word@G@>BZ@[ S@>BZ zM՜.+,0 hp  鶹 Illinois University.Z WESTERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY Title  !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=>?@ABDEFGHIJLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_`abcdefghijklmnoprstuvwxz{|}~Root Entry FdZData C1TableKJWordDocument1SummaryInformation(qDocumentSummaryInformation8yCompObjq  FMicrosoft Office Word Document MSWordDocWord.Document.89q