ࡱ> ` ~bjbj 7v%  @@@8@l@A\ eAA"AAABBB$hm  FJBBFJFJ AA`O`O`OFJ0 A A`OFJ`O`O* AA %Pn@vKR50eM @ B Dv`O'F,SGBBB NdBBBeFJFJFJFJ % %  WESTERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY Regular Meeting of the FACULTY SENATE Tuesday, 7 March 2006 4:00 p.m. Capitol Rooms - University Union A C T I O N M I N U T E S MEMBERS PRESENT: Mr. Adkins, Ms. Allen, Mr. Bennett, Mr. Clontz, Mr. DeVolder, Mr. Erdmann, Mr. Hall, Ms. Jelatis, Ms. Livingston-Webber, Ms. McCain, Mr. Meegan, Ms. Meloy, Mr. Miczo, Mr. Ness, Mr. Orwig, Mr. Rock, Ms. Shouse, Ms. Sonnek, Mr. Thompson, Ms. Wolf, Ms. Young Joseph Rallo, Provost and Academic Vice President; Dale Hample, Parliamentarian MEMBERS ABSENT: Mr. Rabchuk GUESTS: Pat Anderson, Barb Baily, Lee Brice, Felix Chu, Binto George, Fred Isele, Tej Kaul, Janice King, Walter Kretchik, Marty Maskarinec, Kathy Neumann, Jim McQuillan, Joe Rives, Joe Schmitz, Jay Tevis, Tom Tomlinson, Matt Yarnell I. Consideration of Minutes 21 February 2006 APPROVED AS DISTRIBUTED II. Announcements A. Approvals from the President 1. Policy on Departmental Responsibilities B. Provosts Report Provost Rallo told senators that the administrator hiring process is proceeding well and several searches should be brought to closure in the near future. Provost Rallo announced that this year the Illinois Board of Higher Education has selected 鶹s First Year Experience as one of its benchmark programs. He explained that the IBHEs benchmark programs represent standards of excellence against which other institutions can compare themselves. The official announcement will be made in the near future. C. SGA Report Matt Yarnell reported that SGA has been working on recommendations made by the Community-University Partnership Program to reduce fighting in the Macomb community. Two student representatives Kyle McNeely, Chair of SGA Education Committee, and SGA President Bridget Early have been appointed to serve on the Online Course Information Implementation Committee. Board of Trustees student representative Chris Thomas gave a presentation to SGA regarding the Universitys Master Plan. Unity has received $500 for awareness week activities April 10-15 to help offset the cost of the speaker. D. Other Announcements 1. Katrina Daytner has been elected to the vacant seat on Faculty Senate for the College of Education and Human Services beginning fall 2006. An election for one remaining at-large seat is ongoing. 2. Illinois Board of Higher Education Faculty Advisory Council (Steve Rock, 鶹 Member) Chairperson Rock included in packets a report entitled Eight Theses on Higher Education in Illinois which was prepared by the IBHE Faculty Advisory Council to be sent to the IBHE, Illinois legislators, and, in revised form, to the general public. 3. Chairperson Rock announced that the Computing and Information Technology Committee (CIT) has been reconstituted into the Presidents Technology Advisory Committee, which will be composed of a Technology Users Group and a Technology Infrastructure Group. Chairperson Rock explained that five faculty appointed by Faculty Senate from each college and the Library had formerly been serving on CIT, but that Senate has been asked to consider reducing the number of faculty representatives to the Technology Users Group to two in order for it to be more manageable. Assistant to the President for Budget and Planning Joe Rives told senators that CIT had recommended to President Goldfarb that 鶹 either hire a Chief Information Officer or ask Dr. Rives to chair their group. Lacking the monetary incentives to attract a CIO at this time, Dr. Rives stated that he was asked to chair the reconstituted Presidents Technology Advisory Committee. Dr. Rives anticipates that the Technology Users Group and the Technology Infrastructure Group will develop recommendations for the President, working both collaboratively and independently. He said there is intentional overlap on the two committees, with himself, University Computer Support Services Director Mitch Davidson, University Information Management Systems Director Elvin Hodges, and Electronic Student Services Director Bob Emmert serving on both. Dr. Rives stated that the Users Group currently has one representative from each vice presidential area and academic college, as well as the Library, but when asked he noted that the college representatives appointed have generally been administrative rather than faculty. Senator Thompson suggested that faculty representation should be present on the Technology Infrastructure Group as well as on the Users Group since there is something of an artificial distinction between hardware and software. Dr. Rives explained that the Technology Infrastructure Group is currently made up of administrators charged with the oversight of technology at 鶹. Senator Thompson stated the Library would like to have a representative on both Groups. Motion: That Faculty Senate have two representatives on the Technology Users Group who may be, but do not have to be, senators (Livingston-Webber/Sonnek) Senator DeVolder remarked that he would hate to see any college excluded from faculty representation on this group, particularly the College of Business and Technology, and he would support continuing to have five representatives appointed to it. Senator Livingston-Webber pointed out that this would make it an 18-member committee, and its size would make it nearly impossible for all members to find a time when they could meet together. It was pointed out that the committee would already grow to 15 members with two Senate representatives so the addition of faculty is not the cause of its size. Senator Livingston-Webber added that there are a limited number of faculty with technology interest or experience to fill these types of specific vacancies. Senator McCain expressed her support for Senator DeVolders position since the technology needs of the various colleges may be very different. MOTION FAILED 6 YES 12 NO 3 AB Motion: That one faculty member from each college and from University Libraries be appointed to represent Faculty Senate on the Technology Users Group (DeVolder/McCain) MOTION APPROVED 16 YES 2 NO 3 AB Motion: That there be one faculty member chosen by Faculty Senate appointed to the Technology Infrastructure Group (Thompson/DeVolder) Provost Rallo reminded senators that this is the Presidents committee and that he tried to assign to it the right balance of persons whose day job is technology. The Provost stated that President Goldfarb would consider the Senates recommendations but that the final committee decisions are his. In response to a question, Dr. Rives assured senators that any hardware decisions would not be made without the input of both committees to the President, and no recommendations or advice will go forward to President Goldfarb without discussions between both groups. He stated there will be room for minority reports to go forward without the full support of both groups since they are established as advisory groups. Senator Thompson asked if the four persons who will serve on both groups are all hardware people, and Dr. Rives noted that is the case. Senator Thompson responded that it seems that hardware overlaps on the software group but not vice versa. Senator DeVolder asked senators to keep in mind that the hardware-software differences are artificial so hardware experts are also very software proficient. MOTION WITHDRAWN Committee on Committee was charged to determine five faculty representatives to the Technology Users Group. 4. Presidents Day versus Lincolns Birthday Observance Survey Results Chairperson Rock reported that the recent survey of faculty, staff, administrators and students showed a preference for the observance of Presidents Day over Lincolns Birthday by a three to one margin. Chairperson Rock will report the results of the survey to the Board of Trustees at their meeting on Friday, March 10, and will ask them to consider allowing 鶹 to observe Presidents Day rather than Lincolns Birthday beginning in spring 2009. 5. Executive Committee Charge to CCPI Subcommittee Senators received in their packets discussions regarding the CCPI subcommittee at Executive Committee meetings as excerpted from ExCo minutes, an excerpt from the CCPI minutes of February 23, an email from a concerned faculty member and Provost Rallos response, an undergraduate degree template, a chart of terms related to academic programming, two CCPI subcommittee reports to the Senate Executive Committee, and an email regarding additional questions from ExCo to the subcommittee dated January 23. Chairperson Rock told senators that perhaps the process had not been as transparent as it should have been since rumors are flying across campus regarding the subcommittees charge and how it affects CCPI and current majors. Chairperson Rock stated the first communication between the Executive Committee and the subcommittee directed them to define academic terms which may be unclear, such as option, emphasis, and track. The Executive Committee submitted additional questions to the subcommittee following receipt of their initial report, but since their responses were not satisfactory to ExCo, Drs. Rallo and Hample were asked to give the subcommittee greater guidance regarding ExCos expectations. Chairperson Rock stated that CCPI has felt that they must meet every week in order to provide the requested information to the Executive Committee but that no timeframe has been set and he thinks their work could be done during monthly subcommittee meetings. There is no expectation that the subcommittee should report back to ExCo this semester. Chairperson Rock stated that Provost Rallo has said explicitly that he will not ask current majors to be reduced but also that he will not look favorably upon the continued submission of requests for overly large majors. He asked the Provost to discuss the undergraduate degree template. Provost Rallo told senators that he has been asked why 鶹s majors are so large; some of them are two to three times as big as others. He said he has also been presented with certificate programs that were basically as large as majors. The template proposed by the Provost divides a standard 120 s.h. major into 60 s.h. of major/minor or comprehensive major hours with the other 60 s.h. comprised of 43 s.h. of Gen Ed and a 17 s.h. Window of Opportunity. The Provost stated that if 鶹 decides upon a cross-cultural component for graduation, he will not approve it being added onto existing majors but rather it should become part of what every student has to take and can fit into the 17 s.h. Window of Opportunity. He said this Window should allow students to have different options for broadening their scholastic experience, but what has happened is that many departments have used this Window to bulk up their majors. Provost Rallo stated that the template will not be appropriate for every degree, and asked the CCPI subcommittee to determine some exceptions to this standard, such as accreditation or state requirements. The template lists items currently transcripted as majors, minors, and options. The Provost stated that like items should be transcripted, but that the University can decide what belongs on a transcript and it would be a simple fix if the recommendation is to change this. Provost Rallo stressed that the chart is a suggested template against which the CCPI subcommittee is being asked to measure degree proposals and to say what the exceptions to the standards should be. Senator Livingston-Webber stated that in the excerpt from the January 17 Executive Committee minutes it states that The Provost told ExCo that what is needed is a stronger sense of what Faculty Senate wants within these academic categories, but that the Senate has never been asked to express this. She added that CCPIs minutes of February 23 seem to indicate that they are being given a charge that is all over the map and that would include evaluating all existing programs at 鶹, focusing on the Provosts template, and coming back to Faculty Senate with a template for all majors. Senator Livingston-Webber added that the only part of this that was discussed on the Senate floor was certificates. Provost Rallo responded that what Senator Livingston-Webber is referring to are minutes, not charges. He said that what he told the CCPI subcommittee was to determine exactly what constitutes a major and minor, what are the reasons for exempting some majors from the standard template, and, from now forward, for CCPI to identify those academic categories that make sense. Provost Rallo stated he feels the subcommittee should be given an appropriate time to complete the charge, but he indicated he will not continue to sign off on large degree programs that come forward with no justification as to why additional hours are necessary. Provost Rallo was asked if he desires more uniformity among majors, but he responded that he does not; he is asking for definitions. Chairperson Rock asked Parliamentarian Hample if it was appropriate for ExCo to proceed as they did with the CCPI subcommittee. Parliamentarian Hample responded that it was appropriate because ExCo acts on behalf of the Senate. He added that the whole discussion proceeded incrementally. Senator Jelatis asked if there was an official charge from Faculty Senate to the CCPI subcommittee at this point or only an Executive Committee charge to the subcommittee. Chairperson Rock responded that, given the concerns expressed, he would like for Senate to make a formal charge to take the responsibility off of the Executive Committee since the discussion has accelerated to the point where ExCo is not comfortable proceeding without Senate approval. Senator Livingston-Webber stated that it seemed odd that the two representatives from ExCo to the CCPI subcommittee were the two who are not actually members of ExCo or of Senate, which seemed to make the process murkier. Parliamentarian Hample responded that he and Provost were the ones available to meet with the subcommittee, and Chairperson Rock added that, in hindsight, he probably should have been in attendance as well. In response to a question as to whether existing programs would be grandfathered in after new standards are established, Chairperson Rock stated that no one is suggesting that existing majors, minors, and other programs should be scrutinized with the intention of making them smaller. Provost Rallo stated that he visualizes the process as a fact-finding, information-gathering process that must be reported back at some point to Faculty Senate. The Provost stated that in his role as chief academic officer of the University, he will be asking for standards with which to measure future proposals. Motion: That CCPI be asked to come up with some principal distinctions among the categories list in the Terms Related to Academic Programming chart (Livingston-Webber/Shouse) Senator Livingston-Webber explained that the problem is that distinctions between academic terms are ambiguous and overlapping so a more principled set of distinctions among the categories needs to be determined. She added that she does not think that certification issues should be part of the discussion at all since they would require a rationale to step outside of the established standards. Senator Erdmann asked for an impression from CCPI as to how monumental they see this task. CCPI Chair Pat Anderson responded that it would be a very large and time consuming undertaking and that she views it with some trepidation. Senator Shouse remarked that the task seems to be more snowballing than incremental, and she sees some reticence on the part of CCPI in making recommendations as to what a major ought to be. Senator Erdmann suggested that a flow chart might be able to be developed to send to each department to lessen some of the burden on the CCPI subcommittee. Senator Jelatis pointed out that when the Council on General Education was asked to review Gen Ed, they were given a year off from considering any curriculum requests. She suggested that perhaps the task might be better assigned to a subcommittee separate from CCPI, which could then concentrate solely on curriculum decisions. Dr. Rives volunteered the assistance of Institutional Research and Planning to assist the CCPI subcommittee. He stated that the IBHE has definitions of certification semester hours for majors and minors that must be provided to NCA during its accreditation process. It was pointed out that the CCPI subcommittee does include representation from each academic college on campus. Amendment: That the CCPI subcommittee be asked to come up with some principal distinctions among the categories list in the Terms Related to Academic Programming chart (Livingston-Webber) Senator Ness pointed out that what the subcommittee has reported out so far is what currently exists on campus, but it appears that what is being asked is for the subcommittee to create definitions as to what should exist in the future. He asked if the subcommittee was being asked to recommend a new set of guidelines to start from this point on, and Senator Livingston-Webber responded that would be the desired recommendation. Senators discussed possible timelines for the recommendations, noting that it is too late in the semester to require any report by the end of this academic year. Friendly amendment: To complete the task by the end of fall semester 2006 (Rock) AMENDED MOTION APPROVED 19 YES 0 NO 0 AB Dr. Anderson told senators she is somewhat frustrated at what took place since the CCPI subcommittee has worked hard and were told their report was snippy. She felt there was a lack of communication, and Chairperson Rock apologized for any misinformation to the subcommittee. III. Reports of Committees and Councils A. Committee on Committees (Joan Livingston-Webber, Chair) AD HOC COMMITTEES: Student Learning Assessment Committee Aimee Shouse, Political Science Online Course Information Implementation Committee Bradley Dilger, English and Journalism Jeff Matlak, University Libraries Bill Thompson, University Libraries (Chair) There were no further nominations. The nominees were appointed by acclamation. B. Council on Curricular Programs and Instruction (Pat Anderson, Chair) Computer Science Chair Kathy Neumann told senators that her departments curriculum requests represent a culmination of almost two years of development work. She stated the department has surveyed employers and alumni, visited institutions with similar degrees, considered recommendations from professors and employer expectations, and performed market analysis studies. Dr. Neumann stated that as technology has evolved, the department saw a need to offer an additional technology-related major to students for whom Computer Science is not currently meeting their needs. She told senators that many institutions, including Illinois State University, offer the proposed major. In addition, Dr. Neumann stated that national labor statistics indicate that telecommunications is the fastest growing occupation in the national and in Illinois, second only to medical assistants on state and nation lists. Dr. Neumann stated she feels the proposal is a solid program that will bring in new students and is a compliment to existing programs on campus. 1. Requests for New Courses a. IM 344, Telecommunications Planning and Management, 3 s.h. In response to a question, Information Management and Decision Sciences Chair Tej Kaul stated that he expects IM 344 to be required for IMDS majors in the future but that it would be required only for Telecommunications Management majors at the present time. b. TM 321, Local Area Network Management, 3 s.h. c. TM 322, Wide Area Network Management, 3 s.h. d. TM 422, Web Technologies, 3 s.h. e. TM 432, Network Performance Analysis, 3 s.h. f. TM 434, Distributed Systems, 3 s.h. g. TM 436, Advanced Network Security, 3 s.h. h. TM 490, Telecommunications Management Seminar, 1-3 s.h. (repeatable to 6 s.h., 3 s.h. per semester) i. TM 495, Telecommunications Management Internship, 1-12 s.h. (repeatable to 12 s.h.) j. TM 499, Independent Study, 1-3 s.h. (repeatable to 6 s.h., 3 s.h. per semester) NEW COURSES APPROVED 2. Request for New Major a. Telecommunications Management CCPI Chair Pat Anderson told senators that there was discussion at CCPI as to why the proposal was not for a comprehensive major, but it was explained that it was such a narrow topic that there was a need for students to include a minor to allow for greater breadth. NEW MAJOR APPROVED IV. Old Business A. Council for International Education (Fred Isele, Chair) 1. Policies and Procedures The Council for International Education (CIE) in a memo to the Senate Executive Committee asked Faculty Senate to determine if CIE has overstepped its authority as stated within the Senate Constitution, and, if not, for Faculty Senate to either 1) approve the Policies and Procedures in its entirety, 2) disapprove the document in its entirety, or 3) approve certain portions of the document and reject certain other portions. For the portions rejected, CIE in its memo asked for a written explanation from Faculty Senate regarding what is rejected and why, and that the Policies and Procedures document be returned with each rejected word, sentence, or section placed in bold text, followed immediately by the new Faculty Senate-approved text placed in parentheses. Senator Jelatis stated she does not feel that CIE has overstepped its authority since they were asked to define criteria for what an international course should look like, which they have done after much hard work and research. Chairperson Rock stated that when 鶹 hired Provost Rallo, the University accepted his vision for internationalizing the campus, so he feels 鶹 should move ahead with an international curricular initiative. He added that it is also appropriate for the Senate to have some body that defines what international means and makes sure that some standards are applied. Chairperson Rock told senators he agrees with most of the CIE Policies and Procedures, but feels there are some pieces of the document that create more of a roadblock to international education at 鶹 than an enhancement. He went on to note that there is some rigidity in the document and that with slight changes much of the same sentiment can be expressed. Chairperson Rock had made suggested revisions to the CIE Policies and Procedures, which were earlier emailed to senators. He stated that he hopes his proposal represents something that all sides can live with and is a way to reach closure on this process. Chairperson Rock added that although CIE has not seen his revisions, he wanted something to discuss on the Senate floor that could be sent back to CIE for consideration. Motion: To approve the CIE report (Clontz/Jelatis) Senator Ness suggested that CIE be provided with Chairperson Rocks suggested revisions so that they can consider and/or revise them and present it as their own version of the report if they desire to do so. Chairperson Rock responded that if Faculty Senate is not comfortable with his suggestions, there is no need to send them on to CIE. Senator Ness noted that since CIE has not seen the suggestions, it puts them at a disadvantage at this meeting. Motion: To consider Sections 2.a. and 2.b. of the CIE Policies and Procedures (Livingston-Webber/Wolf) MOTION APPROVED 18 YES 0 NO 0 AB Senator Wolf noted that the Duties of the Council for International Education as stated in their Policies and Procedures does not exactly match their duties as stated in the Senate Bylaws. She pointed out that the Policies and Procedures document lists certain of CIEs duties as to Recommend initial approval of all international courses, programs, and curricula and to Recommend approval of all significant changes in the international component requirements for individual courses, programs, and curricula, but the Bylaws do not mention the word programs. She added that incorporating such a change into the CIE Policies and Procedures would necessitate bringing a change to the Bylaws for a vote at Senate. CIE member Walter Kretchik explained that individuals began using the word programs when referring to international curricula, and it was added to the Policies and Procedures document to protect Faculty Senate since its omission could provide a loophole. Parliamentarian Hample pointed out that if the word was left in the document and the Bylaws were not revised, it would have no standing since it violates the Senate Bylaws. He suggested that if CIE wishes to include the word programs in their duties, that they submit a recommendation to revise the bylaws. Motion: To amend Sections 2.a. and 2.b. to remove the word programs from each (Livingston-Webber/Meloy) MOTION APPROVED 17 YES 0 NO 1 AB SECTIONS 1. AND 2. APPROVED AS REVISED 19 YES 0 NO 0 AB Senators next discussed Chairperson Rocks proposal to replace comparative with international in Section 3. Definitions: International Education consists of an intensive comparative international experience designed so that the student can investigate interests, challenge preconceptions, and be exposed to and engage in global issues that have either shaped the world, currently shape the world, or will potentially shape the world in the future. In Section 3.b. of the Policies and Procedures, comparative is defined as Offering exploration of more than one internationally recognized nation, country, global region, or non-US citizen-based foreign culture. Dr. Kretchik told senators that when CIE began to examine a years worth of analysis of international education, their consideration of other institutions showed the word comparative used throughout all of them. He stated the dominating philosophy CIE found was that by definition something cannot be considered to be international education without being comparative. Dr. Kretchik added that CIE saw this as an essential component of international education, so they considered how it should be defined so that it would be acceptable for 鶹. Chairperson Rock told senators that at a meeting with CIE and Provost Rallo, he felt the Provost made a strong case that comparative is not always necessary for a course to be international. He used as an example a faculty member who had been a Peace Corps fellow in an African country teaching a class on that country; this would not being considered an international course according to CIEs definition. He added that even a single country focus will always be comparative because that country will always be compared to the United States. Dr. Rives asked about the first sentence under 3.a.: As Council policy, those seeking international education sanctioning of all new or revised undergraduate courses, major/minor programs, and curriculum/curricula at 鶹 Illinois University or its associated or affiliated campuses are subject to the following definitions Dr. Rives questioned the definition of sanctioning in this sentence and what would happen if a department chose not to seek it. The suggestion was made to replace the word sanctioning with approval. Senator Jelatis used the example of the concept of multicultural classes: if multicultural credit is desired, it is not enough to just talk about women or affirmative action; other specific criteria must be met. She added there is a difference between a multicultural class and a class that happens to discuss women or affirmative action groups. Senator DeVolder stated he cannot imagine taking a foreign language course and it not being counted as an international experience, but Joseph Schmitz of CIE responded he could not imagine taking a foreign language course and it not being a comparative experience. Senator Jelatis asked if 鶹s international programs would have to meet NCA or other guidelines. Dr. Rives responded that NCA does not offer accreditation based upon disciplines. They will, however, consider the standard practices in the field and if 鶹 is complying with what the institution says it plans to offer. Motion: That the word international be substituted for comparative in the second paragraph of Section 3.a. (Meloy/Ness) Chairperson Rock noted that he has also recommended eliminating the last two paragraphs of Section 3 which elaborate on a comparative approach for international education. Dr. Kretchik told senators that the operative phrase in the definition of comparative is more than one. He stated the comparative piece is present because it is what experts say separates an international experience from a domestic experience. Dr. Kretchik stated he taught students in Turkey but did not consider it to be an international course because it was taught from a U.S. perspective. On the other hand, Dr. Kretchik stated that a graduate seminar that he taught on the history of U.S. foreign relations, which examined how policies were received by various governments around the world, in which students were able to make a judgment between U.S. policies and how they were reacted to abroad, would be a comparative international course. Chairperson Rock, in response to a question regarding the definition of international, explained that while comparative looks at two to three things separately, international would consider anything outside the geographic United States. MOTION FAILED 2 YES 5 NO 7 AB Senators were asked to think of ideas and proposals regarding CIEs Policies and Procedures and to send them to the Executive Committee where they can be placed in the packet for the March 28 meeting. Chairperson Rock will also send to CIE his proposed revisions to the document, as well as any additional input received from senators. V. New Business None Motion: To adjourn (Jelatis/Livingston-Webber) The Faculty Senate adjourned at 6:05 p.m. Jean Wolf, Secretary Annette Hamm, Faculty Senate Recording Secretary     PAGE  PAGE 9 3ABJKSVW   - 9 E P e p z д領xph`XP`h^WZCJaJhHTCJaJhOCJaJh4yCJaJhXCJaJhL^rCJaJhyF CJaJh{kCJaJhLPCJaJhnCJaJhn/CJaJhki5>*CJ\aJh^WZ56CJ\]aJhO56CJ\]aJhki56CJ\]aJhki6CJ]aJhki5CJ\aJhkiCJaJhkiBXYc   ! " ) * ; < ^gd~z & Fgd4y ^ gdLP  ^ `@&@&gdn$a$$@&a$@&~~     ! ) * 8 D O Z  ( ) * , ȽȵȽȭ}rfZOhxhLPCJaJhxhLP>*CJaJhxhki>*CJaJhxhkiCJaJhnCJaJhXCJaJhn/CJaJhS{CJaJhCJaJhYOCJaJhz_CJaJhOCJaJhki5CJ\aJhkiCJaJhL^rCJaJhhZCJaJh:%CJaJhyF CJaJhLPCJaJhm CJaJ, 1 5 6 : ; < > D U V W [ h i j k m u v ڟګڈtiaVitMhki>*CJaJhxh|CJaJhz_CJaJhxhsCJaJhxhXCJaJhz_>*CJaJhxhs>*CJaJhxhmC/CJaJhxhki>*CJaJhxhgg_CJaJh!5CJ\aJh6hki5CJ\aJhxh~zCJaJhxhkiCJaJhxhtCJaJhyF CJaJh!CJaJ< V W i j m n T9 & F&gdy|^gds^gds^gdz_^ & F & Fgdgg_  @&^ ` l m n < P /34<=>HITU[oST89:=PQRU˿ޤޤޤޤޤޜޤޑ}xthA hA>* h{.>*hxhki>* hxhshxhuCJaJhACJaJhfCJaJhkiCJaJhxh>~CJaJhxhki>*CJaJhxhsCJaJhS{CJaJhy|CJaJhz_CJaJhp>CJaJhp>>*CJaJ,9:QRYrslmop  & Fp^pgd*  & Fp^pgdBA & Fp0^p`0gdA  & F^gds^gduUYspizfi& " 1 = W"a"f"q"t"""""####$$$$ǻǶǻǶDzDzDzDzDzвDzhT*hT*5hT* hfW5hfWhfW5hQchfW h5h chh*hzhS{hAha hBAhBAhBA>*h5hfCv w $$$$Y%Z%%%l'm'''~**--  & Fp^pgdBA & Fp0^p`0gdf  & F^gdT*  & Fp^pgd*$$Z%[%]%%%%%%^'_'h'i'k'l'm'n'p''''}*~* + + +6+E+B,K,9.Y.....2/3/@/D/0233 44d444-5.5/5'6,66*747ĽĹĹĹĵԱԱĕhhQc hh4 h46h4hthh 4h7*hQ8 hQ8hQ8h=XhBAhBAhf>*h ch5hf hBA>* hS{>*hBAhBA>*ha hT* hT*59-.5/5::??AABBFFGIHIJJYLZLLLLLM & Fp0^p`0gd & Fp0^p`0gdf & Fp0^p`0gd447G9P9 ::t:::C<E<<<==>>V?f?~@@@@AAZAABBBClDqDhEiE~FFGFIGIIITIYIaIbIoI[LoLLLLLMMMMNNN¾hxhnCJaJhxhki>*CJaJhxhkiCJaJhs h/Gh/Gh/G h/G5hh5 h5hh;7hRhR5hRh ch=^h=XhE5hQ8h9MMNN;N\N]NqNsNNNNNO*CJaJhE5>*CJaJhE5CJaJhE5hy>*CJaJhE5hE5>*CJaJhT0CJaJhtCJaJhyhy5>*CJaJhE5hE55>*CJaJhyCJaJhxh4xCJaJhxhX^CJaJhxh= NCJaJhxhX^>*CJaJhxhuCJaJOOP?PPP R R#T%T@TATT)U.UUWWW XXXXXXXY,Y-Y.Y2Y>Y?Y@YCYfYY\˿˷˯˯˿}uludh> CJaJhz_>*CJaJhz_CJaJhxhmC/CJaJhxhki>*CJaJhxhkiCJaJht?CJaJh!CJaJhs;$CJaJhr0CJaJh(h(5CJaJh(CJaJh/CJaJhQ8CJaJhLMCJaJh/GCJaJh/Gh/G>*CJaJ$#TATTTUUUUVHVrVV W`WWWWWW X XYY,Yp^pgd(gd/ @ 0^@ `0gd/@ ^@ gd(gd/G,Y.Y?Y@YgY}Y~YYY^^ b b=b>bddldmdddiip^pgd> ^gdz_gdz_`gdz_ `0]^`0gdPp^pgdt?\]=^H^U^^^^^Q`Z`p`q```aa bbdd dd%dfdjdmddMgPgbgiiiij-j.j/jWjljmjkǻdzǫǻǣǛǻǏzrhp*CJaJh jr5CJaJhp*hj,5CJaJhp*hp*5CJaJhyFCJaJh9 pCJaJh jrCJaJhdVCJaJhj,hj,5CJaJhj,CJaJh/s5CJaJh> CJaJhQ8CJaJh cCJaJh/sCJaJh6S CJaJ)ijj.j/jljmj]q^qxsysuu,w-wwwVxWx@|A|d|e|}}}}]gdV-^gdz_p^pgd> k'k(k5k2lZo^oooopppIpQpypppppp^qtq+swsxsssssuuu-w5wxUxVx6z7z&{({3{H{K{^{{{{{{{׿׿ǿǿNJNJNJǂǂǂh5xCJaJhJyCJaJhml5CJaJhmlCJaJh h 6CJaJhp*CJaJh)CJaJh CJaJh9 pCJaJhNCJaJhc^CJaJhdVhdV5CJaJhdVCJaJhdVhdV7CJaJ3{?|@|A|d|}}}}}}}}}}}}!~"~#~%~2~:~E~Q~]~_~~~~~~~~~źѯ܂܊܊wod\X\X\X\hEVjhEVUhxh[CJaJh9 pCJaJhxh1"TCJaJhFCJaJhxhkiCJaJhxhkiCJ\aJh1hki5CJ\aJhthFCJaJhthMCJaJhthki>*CJaJhthkiCJaJhz_CJaJh5xh5x5CJaJhJyCJaJh5xCJaJ"}~~+~,~F~L~~~~~~~~~~~~~~&`#$ & F p@ P@&^`Pgd9 p & F p@ P^`P & F & F@&~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~hxhkiCJaJhy\0JmHnHuhN hN0JjhN0JUhEV~~~~~ & F p@ P@&^`Pgd9 p5 01h:pO/ =!8"#$h% @@@ rNormalCJ_HaJmH sH tH P@P Heading 1$ & F @& >*CJaJR@R Heading 2$ & F@&^5CJ\aJH@H Heading 3$ & F@& >*CJaJJ@J Heading 4$ & F@&5CJ\aJZ@Z Heading 5$ & F@&]^5CJ\aJDA@D Default Paragraph FontViV  Table Normal :V 44 la (k(No List XOX Level 17$8$H$^OJQJ_HaJmH sH tH XOX Level 4@ 7$8$H$^@ OJQJ_HaJmH sH tH XOX Level 3p7$8$H$^pOJQJ_HaJmH sH tH XO"X Level 57$8$H$^OJQJ_HaJmH sH tH XC@2X Body Text Indent ^ >*CJaJ6B@B6 Body TextCJaJ4 @R4 Footer  !.)@a. Page NumberXR@rX Body Text Indent 2 & F^CJaJ6U@6 Hyperlink >*B*phXS@X Body Text Indent 3 & F^CJaJB>@B Title$L^La$5CJ\aJFV@F FollowedHyperlink >*B* phZYZ  Document Map-D M CJOJQJ^JaJtN@1t -Body Text First Indent 2 hx^h` >*CJaJvBXYc!"  )*;<VWijmnT9:QR  Y r s l m opvwYZlm~""%%.-/-227799::>>Ҵᴡ۶ܶDDDDEE;չFFFFZ\\l\m\\\aabb.b/blbmb]i^ixkykmm,o-oooVpWp@tAtdtetuuuuvv+v,vFvLvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv0000B000c0c0c0c000000000 000 0F 0F 0F0F0F0F0F0F0F0F0F0F0F0F0F& 0& 0& 0F& 0F0F0F0F0F0F0F0F0F0F0F00F0F0F00F00F00F0F0F0F0F0F0F0F0F00F0F0F00F00F00F0F0F0F0F00F00F00F00F00F0F0F00F00F0F0F00F0F0F0F0F0F0F 0F 0F0F0F0F0F0F0F0F0F0F0F0F0F0F0F0F0F0F0F000F0F0F00F0F0F0F0F0F0F0F0F0F0F0F0F0F0F0F0F0F0F0F0F0F0F0F0F0F00000000000000000000000000000000000000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0@0y00@0y00@0y00@0y00@0@0@0@0@0@0y00BXYc!"  )*;<VWijmnT9:QR  Y r s l m opvwYZlm~""%%.-/-227799::>>Ҵᴡ۶ܶDDDDEE;չFFFFZ\\l\m\\\aabb.b/blbmb]i^ixkykmm,o-oooVpWp@tAtdtetuuuuvv+v,vvvvvvvv0P000B000c0c0c0c 000000000 000 0t 0t 0t0t0t0t0t0000000000000y0"0'y0"0'y0"0'y0"0'y0"0'y0"0'y0"0'y0"0'y0"0'y0"0'y0"0'y0"0'y0"0'{0"0'y0"0'y0"0'y0"0'y0"0'y0"0'y0"0&y0"0$0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 0 00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 0 0 0 0 00${00y00y00@0@0 00$ $$$' , U$47NO\k{~~@CDFHJLNORTUW< 9-M#T,Yi}~~AEGIKMPQSVX~B  '!!8@0(  B S  ?%jZj )j Lj Hj>j/j jj \dj jR jT$j1jZjO j\ j j <j4uj tj |jjj ^j42j |j Ԃ j 2jdjlJj<jFj|jj,Zj| jD~vv  ) ) ttDD>>zJzJJJIKIKLiLi{qqq/t/tv      !"#$||% % 1 1 {{KKEEJJJJQKQKYiYiqqqQ=b?$X Xt>LoQ P"l)'Da$\T5Ok$2$|<%Z8}%xvF%FN>/l 5=t&NY@())DfhJqHdu]{H/QiR[Hv6Rh>¸,)*o(.^`o(. L ^ `L.  ^ `.xx^x`.HLH^H`L.^`.^`.L^`L.h@ @ ^@ `OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHohPP^P`OJQJo(hHh  ^ `OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh!!^!`OJQJo(hH0^`0o(.p0p^p`0o(.  L ^ `LhH.   ^ `hH. xx^x`hH. HLH^H`LhH. ^`hH. ^`hH. L^`LhH.0^`0o(.p0p^p`0o(. 0 ^ `0o(.0^`0o(.xx^x`.HLH^H`L.^`.^`.L^`L.0^`0o(.p0p^p`0o(. L ^ `L.  ^ `.xx^x`.HLH^H`L.^`.^`.L^`L.p0p^p`0o(.   ^ `hH.  L ^ `LhH. xx^x`hH. HH^H`hH. L^`LhH. ^`hH. ^`hH. L^`LhH.0^`0o(.h^`OJQJo(hH  L ^ `LhH.   ^ `hH. xx^x`hH. HLH^H`LhH. ^`hH. ^`hH. L^`LhH.@ 0@ ^@ `0o(.   ^ `hH. xLx^x`LhH. HH^H`hH. ^`hH. L^`LhH. ^`hH. ^`hH. X LX ^X `LhH.h@ @ ^@ `OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHohPP^P`OJQJo(hHh  ^ `OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh!!^!`OJQJo(hHh@ @ ^@ `OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHohPP^P`OJQJo(hHh  ^ `OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh!!^!`OJQJo(hH0^`0o(.^`o(.  L ^ `LhH.   ^ `hH. xx^x`hH. HLH^H`LhH. ^`hH. ^`hH. L^`LhH.pp^p`o(.@ @ ^@ `.L^`L.^`.^`.L^`L.PP^P`.  ^ `.L^`L.h pp^p`hH.h @ @ ^@ `hH.h L^`LhH.h ^`hH.h ^`hH.h L^`LhH.h PP^P`hH.h   ^ `hH.h L^`LhH.0^`0o(. xx^x`hH. HLH^H`LhH. ^`hH. ^`hH. L^`LhH. ^`hH. X X ^X `hH. (#L(#^(#`LhH.p0p^p`0o(.@ 0@ ^@ `0o(.  L ^ `LhH. xx^x`hH. HH^H`hH. L^`LhH. ^`hH. ^`hH. L^`LhH.h@ @ ^@ `OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHohPP^P`OJQJo(hHh  ^ `OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh!!^!`OJQJo(hHpp^p`o(. @ @ ^@ `hH. L^`LhH. ^`hH. ^`hH. L^`LhH. PP^P`hH.   ^ `hH. L^`LhH.@ 0@ ^@ `0o(.   ^ `hH. xLx^x`LhH. HH^H`hH. ^`hH. L^`LhH. ^`hH. ^`hH. X LX ^X `LhH.pp^p`o(. @ @ ^@ `hH. L^`LhH. ^`hH. ^`hH. L^`LhH. PP^P`hH.   ^ `hH. L^`LhH.h@ @ ^@ `OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHohPP^P`OJQJo(hHh  ^ `OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh!!^!`OJQJo(hHpp^p`o(.@ @ ^@ `.L^`L.^`.^`.L^`L.PP^P`.  ^ `.L^`L.@ 0@ ^@ `0o(.0^`0o(. xLx^x`LhH. HH^H`hH. ^`hH. L^`LhH. ^`hH. ^`hH. X LX ^X `LhH.0^`0o(.p0p^p`0o(. L ^ `L.0^`0o(.xx^x`.HLH^H`L.^`.^`.L^`L.p0p^p`0o(.@ 0@ ^@ `0o(. L ^ `L.xx^x`.HH^H`.L^`L.^`.^`.L^`L.h hh^h`hH.h 88^8`hH.h L^`LhH.h   ^ `hH.h   ^ `hH.h xLx^x`LhH.h HH^H`hH.h ^`hH.h L^`LhH.0^`0o(. ^`hH.  L ^ `LhH.   ^ `hH. xx^x`hH. HLH^H`LhH. ^`hH. ^`hH. L^`LhH.hpp^p`OJQJo(hHh@ @ ^@ `OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHhPP^P`OJQJo(hHh  ^ `OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh| | ^| `OJQJo(hHhLL^L`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh\\^\`OJQJo(hHh,,^,`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh!!^!`OJQJo(hH88^8`o(.^`. L ^ `L.  ^ `.xx^x`.HLH^H`L.^`.^`.L^`L.pp^p`o(. @ @ ^@ `hH. L^`LhH. ^`hH. ^`hH. L^`LhH. PP^P`hH.   ^ `hH. L^`LhH.@ 0@ ^@ `0o(.0^`0o(. xLx^x`LhH. HH^H`hH. ^`hH. L^`LhH. ^`hH. ^`hH. X LX ^X `LhH.pp^p`o(. @ @ ^@ `hH. L^`LhH. ^`hH. ^`hH. L^`LhH. PP^P`hH.   ^ `hH. L^`LhH.&L p'Da$ P"$4Z6\5='.]gt r2$&NY@JqHl|2iR XR,Wu]{H)/23]C xQ=ke%))DYXur[i&&2*-        )j        Y        `?        xw        $        ɀ;"e                LH, >       &2JD]Ll     Tqi       v&t        E        E                          v9j       "\                 np        CT                ОZ        \fx         h                         j34       0kN0 p9     FUF                D*                          \O         b        2Tc               JI^P&E#chu)d*P^j&)M(7u{1x2!0HqjDf'gKa  yF  Y\ a Wu z ! : 6S vb w 0 ^a _= Xn } K}k#T0Na IHfWI`sOr*!b< g r=Biz%5q8PEXJFboG4Am^q~a`wJy,@{kUr|~/ S !!3!)E!"?"Q"#,#F#s;$I$:% C%0k%&(&w:&oA&1H&]&'Y>'9V's'(2)*T*p*Lz*;+#e,j,r,O,,@7->-`[.{./mC/Wy/T0r0 y0d1"1'.171@12L3 444+4?45o 595:5E5N56*626;6_6i6}6}77=78+8K8I 9J9W9Pm9B.:"0:zD:F:l:~z:7;rH;`;<< < o< ==\=[>p>.?O?R?@0@k@BA6~A~A+:CD_YDaD E'FT7FwF!G/GVJGmG~1HUEH.ZHrHJUTJKkKv1KbIK~LTHTDUg4UCUHVU_UfnUf VdVdVV)eV|VdX=X>X2Y~Y ZZc#Z~MZ^WZ)YZ[$[:[ \=\.b\k\v\G]_m]/^3^=^X^~^\__-_7_4X_gg_z_\8`,aS@a|aabbbCbPbLybpb cQcD}cvdeleyebeg9fiaf[gkiwi^j~jOk+lzl%m5m7?m0um0vmnn3njnauno9 p7ppcp q qeSq[qnqpq~uqarL^r jrvrss(s/sGstOtt}zt`|t;u,TuJku|}u^vwu]wVuw xx y`y4y6y*IyTyTy~z`.z$?z KzfzS{2|S|J},~%~>~>~_~EVZ0#c)O&1)6n{ k~>/QYa*yn/EV/ %:tmy7|A BR:tLWa3[{a9>;&x_x2 !$f|U@KC_u5xW3U?rhmlQV dSL_R%;7;KN88HKYNMo/ 4X-tVy|.y<hZ y=!oM 44AGY^891)=k](,,z 7*;y_*0 bj|~tA9qJ(MXVo|@S&g9t 3 6P]bt )"/~Yu}@c^bizRna XYg}A Witx45`%Q8nJ0JkSmV-R[h[.DuYY[C1H/ePm.18sHq{> 3@$|t P$IX   /0}@I` n-WorIS\u#%_)58=H9.mTtB=yFMT~t 9@ V^Jt?duQR"4<TU1%=JTFMem#8],I<DQzs {m$7dz Ub5ci1rf {X+Tgj74fo&52Wk m h /[[y\0\3u_ or Hj Jc$J(B<nAO]Csxp> 70pq&(k2 -i556BMdm|2Z0YZu<(B.)e~iyNl J8Pyc;Skdlm$tvH;u)1*T*Tx\0}.=YO` #+Safs1X|FuQR] s=Hu4x0;7>Uoz\ZDc@[[$'[[v@@UnknownG: Times New Roman5Symbol3& : Arial71 Courier5& zaTahoma?5 z Courier New;Wingdings"1h7Bfff(d<d<!84dFvFv 2QHX?(M2WESTERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY Annette Hamm Annette Hamm&                           ! " # $ % Oh+'0 ,8 X d p |WESTERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITYAnnette Hamm Normal.dotAnnette Hamm40Microsoft Office Word@/@n@B@nd՜.+,0 hp  鶹 Illinois University<Fv WESTERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY Title  !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=>?@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXY[\]^_`acdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz{|}~Root Entry FanData Z1TablebWordDocument7SummaryInformation(DocumentSummaryInformation8CompObjq  FMicrosoft Office Word Document MSWordDocWord.Document.89q