ࡱ>  ʘbjbjVV 7<<%^^8ta\n("  $---(222-Z2-22V0Ypv.W$م>0nW*/*HYY*Z+ Xd$2~'|)" 2 n----* ^ g: WESTERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY Regular Meeting, 8 March 2011, 4:00 p.m. Capitol Rooms - University Union A C T I O N M I N U T E S SENATORS PRESENT: P. Anderson, B. Clark, L. Conover, G. Delany-Barmann, D. DeVolder, L. Erdmann, S. Haynes, R. Hironimus-Wendt, M. Hoge, D. Hunter, N. Made Gowda, J. McNabb, K. Pawelko, C. Pynes, S. Rahman, P. Rippey, M. Singh, I. Szabo, B. Thompson, T. Werner, D. Yoder Ex-officio: Ken Hawkinson, Associate Provost; Tej Kaul, Parliamentarian SENATORS ABSENT: L. Miczo GUESTS: Kevin Bacon, Rick Carter, Judi Dallinger, Autumn Greenwood, Molly Homer, Bill Knox, Jim LaPrad, Lea Monahan, Russ Morgan, Macherie Placide, Bill Polley, Renee Polubinsky, Theo Schultz, Cindy Struthers, Ron Williams, Jeannie Woods Consideration of Minutes 22 February 2011 Corrections: In the last paragraph of p. 2, correct the first sentence to read, Senator Pynes suggested said that students may be ready to come to 鶹 after completing one year at a community college, but articulation agreements require encourage that they stay an additional year. Also, in the last sentence replace dual enrollment with articulation agreements. MINUTES APPROVED AS CORRECTED Announcements Approvals from the Provost Requests for New Courses EDUC 280, Pre-Teacher Education Program Admittance, 0 s.h. EDUC 380, Pre-Student Teaching Clearance, 0 s.h. EDUC 480, Pre-Certification Clearance, 1 s.h. Requests for 鶹 in Majors Communication Instructional Design and Technology Provosts Report Associate Provost Hawkinson stated that Provost Thomas has been accompanying President Goldfarb to alumni events and meeting donors in preparation for his upcoming duties as president and sends his regrets for missing the meeting. He stated the Provost, President, Budget Director, and Director for Institutional Research and Planning will testify before the state Senate Appropriation Committee tomorrow about 鶹s financial situation. Dr. J.Q. Adams will present the distinguished faculty lecture on March 31 on the Macomb campus and on April 7 at 鶹QC. Associate Provost Hawkinson pointed out that the Distinguished Faculty Lecturer award is the highest honor bestowed on a faculty member at 鶹, and asked senators to encourage their colleagues to attend Dr. Adamss lecture on The U.S. Census: How Its Racial Categories Have Shaped American Identity. The first candidate for the position of Dean, College of Education and Human Services, will visit the Macomb and Quad Cities campuses later this week, with the third candidate arriving on the 21st. Senator Thompson stated that he has heard individuals question whether the University will be able to meet its May 1 payroll. Associate Provost Hawkinson stated that President Goldfarb has repeatedly offered assurances that 鶹 will meet its payroll for this year. He said the State of Illinois plans to release five percent of the amount owed to state universities per month. The State owes 鶹 approximately $38-39 million in appropriated dollars, $8-9 million in MAP funds, and $1 million for veterans funding. Associate Provost Hawkinson added that the State owes Eastern Illinois University approximately the same amount in the same ratios. He reminded senators that no state agency or university has so far had to default on its payroll obligations, so 鶹 administrators are convinced that the State will find the funds to prevent that occurring. Senator Hunter asked if there is any word about the availability of MAP funding for next year. Associate Provost Hawkinson related he was a meeting recently where that was discussed, and there will be MAP funds provided next year. He stated that, like last year, the deadline date may be set earlier and students who do not submit their materials prior to that date will not be eligible for the funding. Senator Thompson asked about possible legislation affecting benefits for state employees. Associate Provost Hawkinson said he has heard nothing more than what has been broadcast on the radio and in the Chicago Tribune. He stated it appears the three options being considered are 1) a cap on money that can be applied to SURS, 2) requiring current employees to pay more for benefits, and 3) allowing employees to opt out of the traditional plan and choose a plan that allows for individuals to invest on their own (Plan C). He stated there are questions that need to be answered, such as whether the benefit structure is allowed to be changed for current employees and whether a window before changes are imposed would be offered. Senator Thompson asked if 鶹 has taken a position on the possible elimination of 50 percent tuition waivers for state employees, which goes to committee this week. Associate Provost Hawkinson said he does not know the response to this question, but he has heard from 鶹s legislative liaison that this will likely not pass. He stated there is a move from university presidents to increase the number of tuition waivers that can be given, which is currently capped at five percent. Student Government Association (SGA) Report (Autumn Greenwood, SGA representative to Faculty Senate) SGA has asked its Tailgating Committee to revisit their tailgating policy before the next football season. SGA has asked Admissions and Athletics to create a program to allow guests of 鶹 students that fall within a range of probability for college consideration to be allowed to attend 鶹 athletic events for free if they will provide 鶹 with their names and addresses. SGA believes this could be a good recruiting tool for 鶹 as well as encouraging greater attendance at athletic events. Ms. Greenwood expressed congratulations on behalf of SGA to the 鶹 football team and Coach Hendrickson for a successful season. SGA has set aside funds for the second annual Black and White Ball on March 28. Lobby Days have been set for March 30 in Springfield. SGA heard first reading of its new constitution. Senator Hironimus-Wendt commended SGA on its efforts to promote attendance at 鶹 athletic events. Other Announcements The results of the Faculty Senate elections for fall 2011 are as follows: College of Arts and Sciences Jim Rabchuk, Physics College of Business and Technology Martin Maskarinec, Computer Science, and Steve Rock, Economics and Decision Sciences College of Education and Human Services Barry McCrary, Law Enforcement and Justice Administration, and Richard Thurman, Instructional Design and Technology College of Fine Arts and Communication Ilon Lauer, Communication, and Kathleen Myers, Art Election notices have been mailed to chairs and deans and posted on the Faculty Senate website regarding vacancies on the University Personnel Committee for fall 2011. Tenured, full professors are sought to represent the College of Education and Human Services, College of Fine Arts and Communication, and University Libraries/Counseling Center/Illinois Institute for Rural Affairs. Nominating petitions are due to the Senate office by March 11. Reports of Committees and Councils Council for Admission, Graduation and Academic Standards (Bill Polley, Chair) CAGAS at their February 24 meeting approved a request from the School of Nursing to change the graduation requirements of their RN-to-BSN Completion Program. Because students coming into 鶹s program have completed their Associates of Applied Science in Nursing or have received a Diploma in Nursing, they have generally already completed 80 to over 100 semester hours before coming to 鶹, including many of the same courses 鶹s pre-licensure (4-year BSN) students take to earn a bachelors degree. The change would allow six courses for 30 s.h. of transfer credit to be granted to these incoming students as advanced placement credit upon completion of 9 s.h. of gateway courses with a C+ or above. The proposal from Nursing asserts that granting advanced placement for courses completed in this manner would be identical to the Universitys current practice of giving advanced placement credit for Foreign Language proficiency. Senator McNabb asked if other programs have adopted this system of advanced placement. Nursing Director Lea Monahan responded that nearly all programs do offer advanced placement but hardly any advertise it. In fact, she stated that Registrar Angela Lynn and Associate Provost Dallinger were unable to obtain information from peer institutions with the exception of Northern Illinois University; the language of 鶹s proposal is based upon that of Northerns. Senator Pynes asked if 鶹s advanced placement for Nursing will be kept a secret like that of other institutions; Dr. Monahan replied she doesnt know why other institutions are so secretive about the practice but has no problem with 鶹 using it as a recruiting tool because there is a need to be competitive. NO OBJECTIONS Council for International Education (Kevin Bacon, Chair) Request for Discipline-Specific Global Issues Designation THEA 390, World Theatre History I, 3 s.h. DSGI DESIGNATION APPROVED Council for Curricular Programs and Instruction (Jim LaPrad, Chair) Approval Process for Honors Courses In response to a charge from the Executive Committee, CCPI approved procedures, in discussion with Honors College representatives, intended to ensure transparency and collegial support for the approval process for new Centennial Honors College courses/sections. The new procedures would require the Honors College to disseminate all new course/section requests to each academic department as a professional courtesy and, once approved, to forward them to CCPI for informational purposes. Senator Rahman asked if departments would have the opportunity to object to the course/section requests disseminated to them. Centennial Honors College Director Bill Knox responded he would prefer to think of their input as comments. Senator Rahman remarked it sounds like requests would be sent to departments only as a courtesy and again asked if they would be allowed to object. Dr. Knox responded that departments will have an opportunity to see what the Honors College is doing, and the Honors College will talk to departments that raise questions about course proposals. Dr. LaPrad explained that the Honors Council acts as a curriculum review body with representatives from every college and suggested departments could take concerns to their college representatives on the Council. He stated that honors courses are similar to departmental special topics courses, and CCPI believes the revised procedures meet their needs as a University curricular body. Associate Provost Hawkinson related that he has taught in the Honors College and developed honors courses, and it regularly occurs that successful special topics courses become standard offerings. He said the Honors College acts as an incubator to see if courses do well when offered to some of 鶹s best students. Dr. LaPrad pointed out that the new procedures, with informational copies of new honors courses/sections being submitted to CCPI, will satisfy the procedures for honors curricular requests adopted at the October 13, 1981 Faculty Senate meeting which had fallen by the wayside in subsequent years. NO OBJECTIONS Old Business Summer School Committee Bylaws Amendment Second Reading and Vote Faculty Senate considered an amendment from the Summer School Committee that would add the sentence, Graduate Council shall select one person from the Council to serve on the Summer School Committee to the Senate Bylaws, bringing the membership of the Summer School Committee to ten. The Rationale explains that because the budget allotment for summer school includes both undergraduate and graduate class scheduling, the Summer School Committee should include a Graduate Council representative with full voting privileges. AMENDMENT PASSED 20 YES 0 NO 0 AB New Business Council on General Education Bylaws Amendment First Reading Senator McNabb asked about the philosophical motivation behind the proposed bylaws changes. Council on General Education (CGE) Chair Cindy Struthers explained that the Council asked Associate Provost Dallinger to provide them with an informational session for the benefit of new members, which highlighted some differences between current CGE practices and the Senate Bylaws. She said an attempt was also made to simplify the language and reorder the Bylaws section pertaining to CGE. Second reading and vote on the proposed amendment will occur on March 29. Resolution in Support of Ex-Officio Faculty Representation on the Board of Trustees Whereas according to HYPERLINK "http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/ilcs/ilcs4.asp?DocName=011006900HArt.+35&ActID=1140&ChapterID=18&SeqStart=100000&SeqEnd=3596875"110 ILCS 690/35-5 the people of Illinois have legislated that The object of 鶹 Illinois University is to offer such courses of instruction, conduct such research and offer such public services as are prescribed by the Board of Trustees of 鶹 Illinois University or its successor, subject to the provisions of Section 7 of the Board of Higher Education Act; and Whereas the faculty play the significant role in carrying out this objective; and Whereas the Board of Trustees has the legislated responsibility to operate, manage, control, and maintain 鶹 Illinois University; and Whereas it would be of benefit to the Board to have a faculty representative at their discussions, since each faculty members day-to-day responsibility is to carry out the objective defined above; and therefore the faculty as a whole has the best knowledge of the current conditions and needs necessary to meet the demands placed upon the university by the people of Illinois; and Whereas the Faculty Senate Chair is limited to offering short reports to the Board and is unable to actively engage in Board discussions; and Whereas Board discussions often revolve around creating and reforming existing academic programs; and Whereas any modification in the academic programs of the institution should reflect the concerns of those directly engaged in instruction and research, either of which can be significantly altered or influenced by Board decisions; and Whereas any change in academic programs should consider and protect academic freedom; and Whereas the Board has already created an ex-officio member, in the person of the President of the University, to advise them and provide them with an administrative perspective as they seek to meet the Universitys legislated objective; and Whereas an administrative perspective does not necessarily reflect or entirely encompass all the academic considerations and concerns for successfully carrying out research or instruction as legislated in HYPERLINK "http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/ilcs/ilcs4.asp?DocName=011006900HArt.+35&ActID=1140&ChapterID=18&SeqStart=100000&SeqEnd=3596875"110 ILCS 690/35-5; and Whereas the Illinois Board of Higher Education is itself in the legislated (110 ILCS 205/2) process of adding a current faculty member to its board; and Whereas 鶹 has always prided itself on being a leader in the area of shared governance; Therefore, the Faculty Senate of 鶹 Illinois University requests that the Board of Trustees create a second ex-officio member of the Board, one to be elected at large from among the faculty of the university for a term of two years. Senator Pynes asked whether the rules governing Board of Trustees meetings allow for the audience to ask questions or present views; he said if this is allowable, faculty could attend and speak at Board meetings whenever they wished, and if it is not allowable he would be much stronger in favor of the resolution. Parliamentarian Kaul observed that when he has attended BOT meetings, the prevailing practice is that no one in the audience speaks. Senator Rippey remarked that those wishing to present need to be added to the agenda. Chairperson DeVolder informed senators that the role of representatives of the governance groups at BOT meetings is to deliver a report, but there is little discussion and feedback from those presentations. He stated the general practice at BOT meetings seems to be to call for discussion followed very quickly by roll call vote; the amount of actual discussion that takes place at the meetings on agenda items is often very little. Parliamentarian Kaul stated that most of the discussion seems to be basically to approve items on the agenda with the rest apparently occurring by phone or other means before the open meeting when the agenda is moved through very quickly. Chairperson DeVolder clarified that this is speculation only; he does not know when discussion actually takes place on the agenda items. Senator Rippey pointed out that under Illinois law two Board members cannot discuss any item of business unless it is in open meeting, although discussion could occur in subcommittees; the agenda is set and coordinated with the President, so there likely isnt a lot of discussion. She noted that an ex-officio representative from the faculty would be allowed to participate in the institutional structures, such as sub-committees, that are currently not available. Senator Hironimus-Wendt asked if the resolution represents an attempt to allow the faculty union to have a direct relationship with the Board of Trustees and whether the intention is to bring contractual and union issues before them. Chairperson DeVolder responded the resolution is not a union matter and a union representative would not be allowed to fill the ex-officio position, if adopted. He explained the resolution represents an attempt to reconnect the faculty to the Board in order to address the perceptions on the part of some faculty that there is a disconnect between the two. Senator Hironimus-Wendt stated that he would be concerned if a BOT faculty representative tried to wear multiple hats as a union representative as well. Senator Hironimus-Wendt disputed the statement that the Board has already created an ex-officio member, in the person of the President of the University as an equivalent argument because the President is a direct hire of the BOT whereas a faculty member is not directly hired by the Board. He added the President sets the agenda and runs the meetings for the BOT, while an ex-officio BOT faculty rep would not have those additional duties. Senator Hironimus-Wendt also does not believe it is an equivalent argument to state that, the Illinois Board of Higher Education is itself in the legislated process of adding a current faculty member to its board, because adding a faculty member to the 鶹 Board is not equivalent to having a faculty member serve on the IBHE Board in Springfield. He asked if Faculty Senates request to add faculty representation to the BOT also offers a compelling case to add staff representation on the Board. Senator Thompson explained the analogy of the President serving ex-officio on the BOT was used because if the BOT created an ex-officio seat for the President in the past, they can create an ex-officio seat for others in the future. He pointed out that the 鶹 President is as much an employee of the BOT as is a faculty member. Senator Thompson asserted the IBHE adding a currently-serving faculty member to its board is also very equivalent. He stated the IBHE is proposing legislation toward performance-based funding for universities, which would dramatically change the way that programs and departments look and feel, so having a voting faculty member on the IBHE who can steer and discuss legislation that has a direct impact on the lives of 鶹 employees is very analogous. Senator Rippey stated that if the point of the argument is that the President is hired by and accountable to the Board of Trustees, the same could be said for faculty because the BOT awards tenure and can fire faculty while the President only awards rank. Senator Pynes observed that if, as stated in the first sentence of the resolution, the function of the University is to offer courses of instruction and to conduct research, the second Whereas should be stronger. He suggested that rather than stating The faculty play a significant role in carrying out this objective, it be stated that the faculty play the significant role Friendly amendment: To change a to the so that the second paragraph of the resolution reads, Whereas the faculty play the significant role in carrying out this objective (Pynes) FRIENDLY AMENDMENT ACCEPTED Senator Pynes stated that he is not sure of the point of having a faculty member sit on the Board of Trustees and what it will achieve, and pointed out that some of the whereas statements do not seem overly compelling. He asked if the BOT ever includes anything on its agenda that hasnt already gone through the faculty approval process, and what can be achieved by having faculty input at the very end of the process before a decision is made by the Board. Senator Rippey replied that a faculty service on the Board of Trustees represents an indirect way to create a relationship with a member of the faculty as the Board currently has with a member of the student body, a relationship she stated that the Board takes very seriously. She pointed out that the BOT has coffee, lunch, or dinner get-togethers that will provide them with the opportunity to get to know the faculty representative personally. Senator Rippey noted that there are many policy issues that come before the BOT that impact faculty, and faculty dont have a voice at those meetings. She related as an example the occasion a number of years ago when faculty wished to shift from Lincolns Birthday to Presidents Day for University closure. She recalled the student representative to the BOT spoke eloquently about how students at 鶹 adore President Lincoln, and the Board was swept away by that argument and decided not to change the closure day, even though faculty and Faculty Senate had supported it. Senator Hoge stated he thinks requesting faculty representation on the Board of Trustees is a great idea and wonders why a faculty representative has never been seated on the BOT up to this time. Chairperson DeVolder responded he does not know why there has never been a faculty rep on the BOT. He related that he is sometimes invited to attend some of the Board of Trustees social events, such as those held the evening prior to meetings, but that is pretty much the extent of his interaction with BOT members. He said that when he told President Goldfarb about the resolution being proposed by Senate, the President stated he was not quite sure what the position will provide faculty that they dont already have in the role of the Senate Chair. Chairperson DeVolder told senators that ExCo came to the conclusion that there is a significant difference between attending social events and delivering reports at BOT meetings and serving as an ex-officio representative on the Board with more direct involvement, even though not as a voting member. Associate Provost Hawkinson recalled that when 鶹s Board was formed, the question was raised whether faculty should serve on it, and it was pointed out that faculty negotiate with the Board for salary, which represents an inherent conflict. He stated the student member to the Board was added later in its history. He said it was also later decided that representatives from Faculty Senate, SGA, the Civil Service Employees Council, and the Council for Administrative Personnel would have a voice on the Board by presenting regular reports at its meetings. Senator Singh told senators it strikes him as peculiar that whenever Faculty Senate is asked to decide whether a faculty representative should be added to something, they always vote in favor of it. He pointed out that Faculty Senate has always said that faculty are a very important constituency, and it is good to have an idea of what the discussion is like on various committees and boards. Senator Singh noted that because the Board of Trustees is 鶹s highest governing board, the lack of faculty representation on it is a huge lapse. He said it always helps to have a board representative that can relate the course of conversations and explain why decisions are made, and he can see no down side to the resolution. He believes that allowing a faculty member to represent faculty interests to the Board is far more powerful than representation through a paper document or by an administrator or some other entity; faculty are best represented by someone who plays that role in research and service and can most compellingly express the faculty sentiment as they go through their daily lives on our campuses. Senator Singh believes this is the most compelling argument for faculty representation on the Board of Trustees. Parliamentarian Kaul related he was involved when the BOT was created, and at that time faculty did request through their forums faculty representation on the Board. He said this did not come to pass at that time, and subsequent Faculty Senates did not pursue it, but it did result in regular reports from Faculty Senate and other constituent bodies being presented to the Board at every meeting. He also pointed out that six years have gone by since a bill was passed to allow for a faculty member to serve on the IBHE; there have been names submitted to the Governor, who is responsible for choosing the representative. He agreed with Senator Singh that there is no reason that a faculty member should not be allowed to serve on the Board of Trustees since it is the highest governing body and makes policy for the institution. Senator Thompson pointed out that the University President negotiates with the BOT for salary, so the same relationship exists between the President and the BOT as with the faculty and the BOT; both are employees of the Board. He stated that the Board of Trustees is everybodys Board; it is the Board of Trustees of 鶹 Illinois University, which includes faculty, staff and students. Senator Thompson believes adding an ex-officio faculty representative would go a long way toward showing that the Board of Trustees belongs to everyone. Senator Rippey pointed out that students have the same vested interests in decisions of the Board of Trustees as faculty, and they get to vote on issues on which they are interested. She said that, while she does not wish to take the vote away from students, one could also argue that there is a conflict of interest with a student serving on the BOT since the Board votes on matters of tuition and fees. Senator Rippey said she has always been mystified why boards of state universities refuse to have academics as members, comparing this to General Motors barring membership from engineers. She can think of no reason that the Faculty Senate would not wish to put forward the suggestion that individuals who are the life-blood of the University could not contribute to the decisions of that institution, and there is no single model that better exemplifies this than every business corporation in the world. She believes a faculty representative would contribute a great deal to the attitude and the relationship the BOT has with faculty. Senator Hoge added that an ex-officio faculty representative would have an opportunity to address any perceived adversarial relationship between the BOT and faculty. Senator Hironimus-Wendt observed that he still has not heard a compelling reason that the Board would want a faculty representative. He pointed out that the BOT Regulations state that in order to promote shared participation in responsible and wise decision-making except as limited by the scope of collective bargaining so anything to do with collective bargaining is taboo. He said the Regulations go on to state that appropriate and duly constituted committees of faculty government shall participate in the decision-making process of the University in the following areas: 1) University curriculum, 2) basic policies with regard to campus planning and facilities construction and utilization, 3) creation of administrative positions at the level of Dean and Vice President 4) academic planning and the determination of priorities ; the Board in this way has indicated what they want faculty to do. Senator Hironimus-Wendt stated the BOT does have faculty representation in the person of the Faculty Senate Chair to report on the activities of faculty in terms of the obligations that they have been charged to accomplish by the BOT. Senator Hironimus-Wendt explained that he is not arguing that it would be bad for a faculty representative to be seated on the Board, but he does not hear a compelling argument for it. He asked what a faculty representative would bring to the table that is not already available, particularly since union or collective bargaining issues are off limits. He asked if the resolution is recommending that the Faculty Senate chair be made an ex-officio member of the BOT, if the Senate Chair should stop attending BOT meetings when the ex-officio faculty member is appointed, or if the Senate Chair and the ex-officio BOT faculty member should both represent faculty to the Board. Senator Pynes expressed his agreement with the concerns expressed by Senator Hironimus-Wendt, stating that he could see the BOT refusing to add an ex-officio faculty representative for those reasons. He said he has not heard a conception of why faculty should serve on the Board of Trustees other than they just want to be there. He also theorized the Board could decide to name the Provost as the ex-officio faculty representative since he is the chief academic officer of the University, or the BOT could simply decide to give the Faculty Senate Chair and the other representatives of constituent groups more power to speak freely at the meetings. Senator Pynes does not see how a faculty representative is going to be able to make lots of persuasive speeches on the floor, and noted that any faculty representative on the BOT is going to have to know a lot about faculty issues, as do the Senate Chair or the Provost. Senator Pynes stated that while he supports faculty representation, nobody has convinced him that a faculty member should have a seat on the BOT; the resolution as written also does not convince him, although he is not opposed to being convinced. Senator Hunter stated that while he thinks faculty representation on the BOT is a great idea, he agrees with Senators Hironimus-Wendt and Pynes that there is nothing in the resolution that tells the BOT what addition they would receive from a faculty representative other than just another seat at the table. Senator Hunter suggested Faculty Senate consider establishing a subcommittee or asking the Executive Committee to further work on the resolution to see if there is a more convincing way to present a cohesive objective for a shared goal for BOT and faculty that would be met by adding an ex-officio faculty rep. Senator Rahman expressed her complete support of the resolution, regardless of how convincingly it is written. Senator Singh stated as he reads the resolution, what motivates him to believe that it is a great idea and long overdue is he is not convinced that Board members understand in all respects what life is like in the trenches for professors. He would like the faculty representative to be currently teaching and researching on campus so that he/she could provide a reality check to the BOT when they need it. He concurs with Senator Pynes that the faculty representative on the BOT should be someone who is eloquent, has seniority at the University, and understands how 鶹 operates, but believes that if a faculty member does not become a member of the Board of Trustees, there is no way to share and partake of the conversation that occurs on the Board and to inform them about what the faculty community is thinking about topics under discussion. Senator Delany-Barmann added that it is not the idea of rubbing elbows or schmoozing with BOT members that motivates the request from Senate but the impact of the human relationship that is created with face-to-face contact and the faculty perspective that would be brought to the table. Senator Szabo stated that the skepticism regarding the resolution seems to derive from the perception of whether a faculty representative to the Board can be an effective addition, but he sees the addition of a capable faculty member as a win-win situation. He believes the Lincolns birthday discussion provides very compelling evidence for bringing a strong faculty voice to the Board. Senator Pynes stated that what he would like to see is not arguments that would convince him but those arguments that would convince the BOT of the advantages of adding a faculty member. He stated that while Senator Singh did an excellent job of explaining the benefit of faculty representation to the BOT, he would like to see that captured in the language that the Board uses and included in the resolution. He added that for a faculty representative to speak compellingly in a culture in which individuals rarely speak will mean the individual appointed will need to be someone with gumption and who is really prepared and understands a wide variety of issues, and there arent a lot of faculty members willing to fill that role in addition to their other teaching and research demands. He believes what is needed is an individual who is very dedicated to faculty interests and is allowed release time to fill the role, such as the Faculty Senate Chair. Senator Hunter stated he has met many faculty in addition to those sitting at the table who would be amply qualified to serve on the Board of Trustees. He believes if the seriousness of Senator Singhs argument and the passion of Senator Delany-Barmanns arguments could be put into BOT verbiage, then Faculty Senate would have a better chance of convincing the Board that an ex-officio faculty position is necessary and justified. He questioned whether the resolution as written is a persuasive enough document in light of the fact that the Board of Trustees has operated this many years without faculty representation. Senator Szabo stated that the faculty body should not be underestimated, noting that in the School of Music alone there are individuals who would be more than capable of representing faculty interests on the BOT. Senator Rippey noted that the faculty representative would likely be elected by the faculty, who can be trusted to choose someone capable of representing them. She does not understand why the Senate needs to consider the resolution from the position of what the Board of Trustees would think about it; she believes the issue should be considered from a faculty perspective. She does not think the Board of Trustees would have to think very long about why the faculty would desire representation, and the wording of the resolution is as good as any to make the suggestion to them. She said while the first Board of Trustees was very dismissive of faculty, the Board has changed dramatically over the years mainly due to the informal, human relationships that have developed between the representatives and the University. She believes Faculty Senate can trust both the faculty and the BOT to understand why this position is desired. Senator Hironimus-Wendt suggested that the language of the resolution speak to the language of the Board Regulations. He urged the persons who craft the legislation to look at Regulation I.C., Delegation of Authority, and present compelling arguments that explain what the faculty representative will do. He noted that the faculty representative will participate in the crafting of agendas and policies, and as long as that position reflects the mandate of the Board it has a better chance of making sense to the Board. He also noted that the Board of Trustees bears full legal responsibility for the actions of the University, and while a student representative may not be held to that standard, a faculty representative may be expected to share some kind of legal responsibility. Chairperson DeVolder articulated three different sentiments he has heard expressed at todays meeting in regard to the resolution being considered: 1) In favor of the resolution as written, in which case senators should vote to approve it; 2) That the language of the resolution should be rewritten, in which case senators should consider voting the resolution down and proposing a motion to have a new resolution drafted; and 3) Against the idea, in which case the resolution should be voted down. RESOLUTION WITH FRIENDLY AMENDMENT APPROVED 16 YES 4 NO 0 AB Motion: To adjourn (Szabo) The Faculty Senate adjourned at 5:15 p.m. Lynda Conover, Senate Secretary Annette Hamm, Faculty Senate Recording Secretary     PAGE  PAGE 2 *+,-49;fg  & ' 2 > H S ^ f h p r ĽĶyqld\qlW h!RW5h)h}}5h)hq5 hS5h)hS5h)hOBI5h)hYy5h)h!RW5h)h35h)h\$5h)hhm5h)h(5 hFJ5 hK;3hhm h+hhmhaahhmCJaJ he9hkPhe9hFJ6 hS6he9hhm6 he9hvv he9h 1{ he9hhm"Efg    ^gd0Q[ & F gdJn^gd+^gd+ & F gd0Q[gd0Q[ & F gd0Q[gd=gd)gdhm $^a$gde9r  ) : ; S _ l x y   蹲譨xld\h+CJaJh!RWCJaJh1h0Q[>*CJaJh1hGjCJaJh0Q[h0Q[5h0Q[hOBI5h0Q[hA5h0Q[hYy5 hD#5 hn\&5 hS5 h0Q[hhmh)hS5hK;3hhm5CJaJh0nCJaJhSCJaJhK;3hhmCJaJ hK;3hhmh)hGj5h)hc 5$   q z   kn轲|qiqiq^VVh3CJaJh1hrICJaJh!CJaJh!h!CJaJh!h!>*CJaJh!>*CJaJh1h0Q[>*CJaJh+5CJaJh1h0Q[5CJaJh1h0Q[CJaJh1hn\&CJaJhJnhJn5CJaJh"$CJaJhJnhJn7CJaJhJnCJaJh+CJaJh0Q[CJaJ ( Y ^gd! & F gd! & F gd!^gd! & F gd!^gd! & F gd0Q[gd0Q[ & F gd0Q[^gd0Q[^gd0Q[ Omn)* & F ^gdBj^gdq0^gdBB & F gd0Q[p^pgd4o^gdF;B^gd3 & F ^gd0[e^gdrI !NO49lnMV7<=mz̻̳ijijijijxxhBB>*CJaJh1h0Q[>*CJaJh4oCJaJhF;BhF;BCJaJh)6aCJaJhn}h)6aCJaJh~yCJaJhF;B6CJaJh"$CJaJhF;BCJaJh h CJH*aJh CJaJhgoCJaJh3CJaJhrICJaJ*()*.  }#~####&&'L)N)O)***Ͽǫǣwogo_TL_o_h)6aCJaJhn}h)6aCJaJh|CJaJh"$CJaJhU6CJaJhU6hU6>*CJaJhU6>*CJaJh1h0Q[>*CJaJh1hKiCJaJh!CJaJh[;CJaJh2h0Q[>*CJaJh1CJaJhKiCJaJhr;CJaJhq0CJaJhq0hBB>*CJaJhBBCJaJhBBh0Q[>*CJaJ!RS J b!!!   ^ gd! & F   ^ `gd! & F  gd! & F^`gdBjgdKi & F gd0Q[gd1^gdr; & F ^gdBj!}#~######********+++U+V+p^pgd| & F gd| & F gd|^gd|^gdU6 & F gd0Q[gd0Q[ & F gd0Q[gdJn & F ^`gd!********+++V+p+q++++++++- .A......///Z/\/i/m//0}00;2C2]3h3ᵭᎂzrjrjrjrjrjrjrjrjrjrjrjh"$CJaJhtCJaJh15CJaJh>!>!>*䴳0ϰ>*䴳10ϰ䴳1>!䴳>!䴳>!0ϰ>*䴳>!>*䴳䴳>*䴳>*䴳6>*䴳5C)++++++++334444;4<4T4 & F gdc^gdc & F gdcgdc & F gd0Q[p^pgdbHp^pgd| & F gd0Q[^gd0Q[^gd>! & F gd0Q[^gd|@ ^@ gd|h333344444<4S4T42545r5b6d666666666ȼrg[RIhDpz>*CJaJhc>*CJaJhDpzh0Q[>*CJaJh1h0Q[CJaJh9Xht5>*CJaJh9Xht5CJaJh#CJaJhPCJaJhthc>*CJaJhcCJaJhchc>*CJaJhch0Q[>*CJaJh0CJaJh1h0Q[>*CJaJhbHCJaJhtht5CJaJhv$CJaJhtCJaJT4U4c6d66666666699\9]9t;u;^gd=]y & F gdc^gdcp^pgd#^gd# & F gdc^gdc & F gd0Q[ & F gd0Q[gd0Q[p^pgdt^gdt666668!88899[9\9]9e9r9s999::?:n;s;t;u;ѽѥ~hSA"h=]y0J.CJOJPJQJ^JaJ(h=]yh=]y0J.CJOJPJQJ^JaJ+h=]yh=]y0J.6CJOJPJQJ^JaJh=]yh=]y0JCJaJjh=]yh=]yCJUaJh=]yh=]yCJaJh=]yh=]y5CJaJhchc>*䴳#>*䴳"$䴳#䴳#>*䴳䴳>*䴳0ϰ>*䴳;;;;;; <1<2<R<S<T<[<====`>a>b>i>>>>>????@@@@AAA AAA[B\BmBnBtBuBvB}BCCCCjCkClCCYD[DEʵ覙hCJaJh=]yh=]y0JCJaJjh=]yh=]yCJUaJ(h=]yh=]y0J.CJOJPJQJ^JaJ+h=]yh=]y0J.6CJOJPJQJ^JaJh=]yCJaJh=]yh=]yCJaJh=]yh=]y5CJaJ9u;;;S<T<==a>b>>>??@@AAuBvBCCkClCZD[DmKnK^gd=]ygd=]y ^`gd=]yEEqFHHHIOIIIJQJeJJJJlKmKnK.M0MQMZMMNNXNYNNOOOOqPQQ R RRBSEShSpSTTT VVWWWWMXOXZXcXhWjhWj5CJaJhWj5CJaJhWj6CJaJhWjCJaJhCJaJhCJaJh%CJaJhH2CJaJhCJaJh=]yCJaJhZYCJaJhCJaJhCJaJh"$CJaJ6nKYNZN RRVVWWYXZXvXwXE^F^`babddiijillnnssz^gd#^gd=]ycXlXvXwXnZqZZZ[\;]C]D^E^^^(`3`9`<`aacccddaele/f4f:fBf~ffffpgghhhhhhjjkllll/nnnnº²²ºº²ªšhgMCJaJhQxCJaJhcCJaJh7KCJaJh/CJaJh jCJaJh_CJaJh5CJaJhCJaJhf CJaJhWjCJaJhWjhWj5CJaJhP~5CJaJ7noooop(pSp\p^ppppppppppr+rrsss t&t1ttuu/uuvvvv-w3wwwzzzz{{~{{{{{r|~ ~G~跿𯗯𯏯hGkCJaJh#CJaJh\*CJaJhA CJaJh.CJaJh/CJaJhiCJaJhn}h)6aCJaJhn}h jCJaJhn}h _CJaJh _CJaJh jCJaJh4(CJaJ6zz89<=Ǖȕ\sG & Fgd= & F^gdF1 & FgdHN4^gdW!^gd#G~78 &3FKKQ<>VƕǕݕIZ_zrsǗߗȸะxphcCJaJh1hPkCJaJh1hPk5CJaJh1hW!>*CJaJh j5CJaJh jhP~5CJaJhP~CJaJhbJ}CJaJh jCJaJhCJaJh4CJaJhTCJaJhuCJaJhYCJaJh.CJaJh\CJaJ,:>?GHmn˜ØĘŘƘȘɘʘԶԫԠuhn}0JmHnHuh)6a h)6a0Jjh)6a0JUhjhUh1h7CJaJh1hSCJaJh1hw!&CJaJh1h8SCJaJhcCJaJh1h= CJaJh1hF1CJaJh1hb,CJaJh1hPkCJaJ"GHmnƘǘȘɘʘ&`#$ & F p@ P@&^`Pgdw!& & F p@ P@&^`Pgd= 5 01h:pw!&/ =!8"*#$% ^/ H002 0@P`p2( 0@P`p 0@P`p 0@P`p 0@P`p 0@P`p 0@P`p8XV~_HmH nH sH tH @`@ NormalCJ_HaJmH sH tH PP  Heading 1$ & F @& >*CJaJR@R  Heading 2$ & F@&^5CJ\aJHH  Heading 3$ & F@& >*CJaJJ@J  Heading 4$ & F@&5CJ\aJZZ  Heading 5$ & F@&]^5CJ\aJDA`D Default Paragraph FontViV  Table Normal :V 44 la (k (No List X/X Level 17$8$H$^OJQJ_HaJmH sH tH X/X Level 4@ 7$8$H$^@ OJQJ_HaJmH sH tH X/X Level 3p7$8$H$^pOJQJ_HaJmH sH tH X/"X Level 57$8$H$^OJQJ_HaJmH sH tH XC2X Body Text Indent ^ >*CJaJ6BB6 Body TextCJaJ4 @R4 Footer  !.)@a. Page NumberXRrX Body Text Indent 2 & F^CJaJ6U@6 Hyperlink >*B*phXSX Body Text Indent 3 & F^CJaJB>B %Title$L^La$5CJ\aJFVF FollowedHyperlink >*B* phZYZ  Document Map-D M CJOJQJ^JaJtN1t Body Text First Indent 2 hx^h` >*CJaJ@@ WP9_Title $1$a$5aJh^h 0 Normal (Web)&ddd[$\$]^CJOJQJaJ*W* Strong5\66 level1!dd[$\$H"H  Balloon Text"CJOJQJ^JaJ$1$ X7objectfBf 6 List Paragraph$d^m$CJOJPJQJ^JaJ:Q: hm Title Char5CJ\aJH bH 1J No Spacing&CJ_HaJmH sH tH 8q8 5~ object27>*S*Y(phXX 0Ol(-DM &B*fHmHphq sHtHXX 0Li)-DM &B*fHmHphq sHtH.X. N @Emphasis6]<< {moz-txt-underscoreJJJ -42 Subtitle,$<@&a$OJPJQJ^JJJ ,42 Subtitle CharCJOJPJQJ^JaJBb@B =]y0 HTML CodeCJOJPJQJ^JaJPK![Content_Types].xmlj0Eжr(΢Iw},-j4 wP-t#bΙ{UTU^hd}㨫)*1P' ^W0)T9<l#$yi};~@(Hu* Dנz/0ǰ $ X3aZ,D0j~3߶b~i>3\`?/[G\!-Rk.sԻ..a濭?PK!֧6 _rels/.relsj0 }Q%v/C/}(h"O = C?hv=Ʌ%[xp{۵_Pѣ<1H0ORBdJE4b$q_6LR7`0̞O,En7Lib/SeеPK!kytheme/theme/themeManager.xml M @}w7c(EbˮCAǠҟ7՛K Y, e.|,H,lxɴIsQ}#Ր ֵ+!,^$j=GW)E+& 8PK!Ptheme/theme/theme1.xmlYOo6w toc'vuر-MniP@I}úama[إ4:lЯGRX^6؊>$ !)O^rC$y@/yH*񄴽)޵߻UDb`}"qۋJחX^)I`nEp)liV[]1M<OP6r=zgbIguSebORD۫qu gZo~ٺlAplxpT0+[}`jzAV2Fi@qv֬5\|ʜ̭NleXdsjcs7f W+Ն7`g ȘJj|h(KD- dXiJ؇(x$( :;˹! I_TS 1?E??ZBΪmU/?~xY'y5g&΋/ɋ>GMGeD3Vq%'#q$8K)fw9:ĵ x}rxwr:\TZaG*y8IjbRc|XŻǿI u3KGnD1NIBs RuK>V.EL+M2#'fi ~V vl{u8zH *:(W☕ ~JTe\O*tHGHY}KNP*ݾ˦TѼ9/#A7qZ$*c?qUnwN%Oi4 =3ڗP 1Pm \\9Mؓ2aD];Yt\[x]}Wr|]g- eW )6-rCSj id DЇAΜIqbJ#x꺃 6k#ASh&ʌt(Q%p%m&]caSl=X\P1Mh9MVdDAaVB[݈fJíP|8 քAV^f Hn- "d>znNJ ة>b&2vKyϼD:,AGm\nziÙ.uχYC6OMf3or$5NHT[XF64T,ќM0E)`#5XY`פ;%1U٥m;R>QD DcpU'&LE/pm%]8firS4d 7y\`JnίI R3U~7+׸#m qBiDi*L69mY&iHE=(K&N!V.KeLDĕ{D vEꦚdeNƟe(MN9ߜR6&3(a/DUz<{ˊYȳV)9Z[4^n5!J?Q3eBoCM m<.vpIYfZY_p[=al-Y}Nc͙ŋ4vfavl'SA8|*u{-ߟ0%M07%<ҍPK! ѐ'theme/theme/_rels/themeManager.xml.relsM 0wooӺ&݈Э5 6?$Q ,.aic21h:qm@RN;d`o7gK(M&$R(.1r'JЊT8V"AȻHu}|$b{P8g/]QAsم(#L[PK-![Content_Types].xmlPK-!֧6 +_rels/.relsPK-!kytheme/theme/themeManager.xmlPK-!Ptheme/theme/theme1.xmlPK-! ѐ' theme/theme/_rels/themeManager.xml.relsPK] ʐ $$$'r  *h36u;EcXnG~ʘMOPSTWY[\^`acd !V+T4u;nKzGʘNQRUVXZ]_ber1129[:m:ʐXX  '!!8@0(  B S  ?_GoBack:ː:ːOjTskL&lmlV$nodvpLqrr,s Rtru$vvw| x@%yLRz{&|&}%~$OĥNNj,$4,h$E$$$$$%%%''''')))[*[*b*C,C,..2424:4C4;;;;AATTː      !#"$'%&()*-+,.0/123546879;:<=>?@CABDGEFHIJKLMN < < U ^ i i Q]]ivv6AA! !+!+!D$L$$$$$%%%''''')))a*i*i*J,J,..94B4M4M4;;;;AAUUː   !#"$&'%()*,-+.0/123546879;:<=>?@BCADFGEHIJKLMN9O*urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttagsplace=N*urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags PlaceName=L*urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags PlaceType8J*urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttagsCity9B*urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttagsState x&ONNLOJLNJONLOBONNLOJOLNOLNOLNLNOLNOLNONNLNLONNLONLNLONLONLONLOJOJONNLONNLOBOJOJ KQkpW]yvb!l!##%%&& ((**NVRVjjyy~~ǞEJȐːD!&RWN#S#l;Y<EEȐː333333337=L!O!EEFFGGGGIIBKEKhKpK NNMPOP`R`RjRjRnRqRRRST;UCUVVWW(X3X9XǏߏȐːːZ@ali'Da$\Tq>VLX"F $y/\~Ofa:@S@/pUVZ q^l|EAaVSTgz&c vrm L pR7x({0vhp^p`OJQJo(hHh@ ^@ `OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJ QJ o(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJ QJ o(hHhP^P`OJQJo(hHh ^ `OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJ QJ o(hHhp^p`OJQJo(hHh@ ^@ `OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJ QJ o(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJ QJ o(hHhP^P`OJQJo(hHh ^ `OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJ QJ o(hHhp^p`OJQJo(hHh@ ^@ `OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJ QJ o(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJ QJ o(hHhP^P`OJQJo(hHh ^ `OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJ QJ o(hH0^`0o(.p0p^p`0o(. L ^ `L.  ^ `.xx^x`.HLH^H`L.^`.^`.L^`L.hp^p`OJQJo(hHh@ ^@ `OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJ QJ o(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJ QJ o(hHhP^P`OJQJo(hHh ^ `OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJ QJ o(hHhp^p`OJQJo(hHh@ ^@ `OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJ QJ o(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJ QJ o(hHhP^P`OJQJo(hHh ^ `OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJ QJ o(hHhp^p`OJQJo(hHh@ ^@ `OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJ QJ o(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJ QJ o(hHhP^P`OJQJo(hHh ^ `OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJ QJ o(hHh ^`hH.h ^`hH.h ^`o(hH.h p^p`hH)h @ ^@ `hH()h ^`hH()h ^`hH()h ^`hH()h ^`hH()hp^p`OJQJo(hHh@ ^@ `OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJ QJ o(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJ QJ o(hHhP^P`OJQJo(hHh ^ `OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJ QJ o(hHhp^p`OJQJo(hHh@ ^@ `OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJ QJ o(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJ QJ o(hHhP^P`OJQJo(hHh ^ `OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJ QJ o(hH^`o(.  ^ `hH.  L^ `LhH. x^x`hH. H^H`hH. L^`LhH. ^`hH. ^`hH. L^`LhH.h ^`hH.h ^`hH.h^`OJQJo(hHhp^p`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh @ ^@ `hH()h ^`hH()h ^`hH()h ^`hH()h ^`hH()hp^p`OJQJo(hHh@ ^@ `OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJ QJ o(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJ QJ o(hHhP^P`OJQJo(hHh ^ `OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJ QJ o(hH88^8`o(.^`. L ^ `L.  ^ `.xx^x`.HLH^H`L.^`.^`.L^`L. ^ `o(.  ^ `hH. xL^x`LhH. H^H`hH. ^`hH. L^`LhH. ^`hH. ^`hH. X L^X `LhH.L p'Da$q^Z@q>EAax({a:@S/\~OX"F/pUi vrmSTg                                                                         |                          fG\  >6*7G,ly#,5ԱIY>ɳ<COiYorm &=?KPWce (3KcSYAc&p{9&&2;e<FrFW2jy{Q ^J15;GJZg0&PMZM^VH#l/=>PPlS(e|C  42 3 m= $P S [ ![ r 1 A $   ( ( 0 3 "A D L O Q T U c r hr Iy  s & T3 F ^ @c w 1 ?( e= VH X Fe l z  V& |- / P `_ a (h p +z } #d%/5<BJYTZ _"yg~J$rT 9!GJJkS=\ru%C-?/5PNZgef)g3nDxOV}/>KT[q|uF &>4IkpuuY z"9%MmtnK @WZaVw|RwHK$b*ff/' #10M:PCc| @ZD\Fl}5 i$I'047>CEhRDqz~ ~CGYp |  !T"(+8r;L9X>kpz= k.Tq]$*,Pep-}HBWWjk`r#sy 0r Qpxz\ $4949FGTlmv>  + / 22 x: D L R f ]o xo 5~ !K!!1!?5!>!>!A!,D!P!W!Oe!f!k!Jx!}!X~!v""m ".""e" "2":"K"U"t]"e"####a8#8#9#A#G#`I#,S#RU#jV#'a#b#f#-y#c$$<$D$;S$W$jj$% %%%BH%{J%O%O%zW%'_%`%a%h%q%du%{x%x%&&w!&,&--&~4&n\&jd&''E''"'#' ?'\'_'r'w'3}'6''(L ((4(I(X(\(_(l(P|(9) ) )})5)9)?)i@)A)B)I)N)*!*/*N*\*`*q*v*++$,+!D+M+S+T+qU+mX+iy++',8, L,PL,%R,W,1A1vH1V1r1>w1#2H2 222)62W<2O2'y2!3+3P3\3]3^3b3;g3r3s3~3 4l 4 4U4$4 4HN4i4{4P55Z5,5/.515-B5K5\5#_5ug5o5U 6 66$6&6X16U6X6d6u6V"7#7^&7(7(7.7)H7X7^7h7m78&8828;8uG8X8Z8m[8[8`8b8e8 r8`r8|8 9v293969T9Y9Id9f9)z9R$:C.:2:<:?:@:C:c:e: ;;;;D;|G;Y;[;a;zn;Hp;|};;1<R<r[<ly<"===G=:=M=dd=Bh= >(>2>g^>r>-y>=??&?W*?YN?[?\?q]?c?,~??+@@y @6@N$@)7@L@5S@]@x@A,A@3ACADALAAMASAvYAYAvAzAB BRB'BF;B&PBGZBhBjuB~zBVCC C:CdC4C4?CoPC%fC/lCCD DH Dq3D6D8VD)gD pDEo EA!E=EHE5XEaEpEYFO FF9F}0F3F8FOHFNFbFumF{F~FnG G\G5G`OG(ZG]fG gGiGHH,H>H^EHZHbH[fH%iHqH8zHzH~HAIIoIIP5IOBI/PIhWIfIWiI:kI#qIrIevIJJJ*J0J1J:J:JBJZJ^JnJyJ}J K7K*K,K/K/KWKhKjKlKL1 LLL&L7LGL/JLLLXLL)_L%lLftLw{LLgMY&M)ME?MbLMRMCuMd|M NAN N'N'NDNDNaNqN|NO4COnOrOwOkP P2P=POP\PrPsP{P QE&Q:QAQLQ\QaQgQwQ0R RR RH&R'R"(R2Rf>RERGReMRqMRMRhPRXRYR]R^RZmRoR8yRDS,Sc SSS?SaJS=YS\S}S T.T%4T9T+=TKVTt[TB\TeToTUUUUhU'U+U2U|YUcUiUV2V2VGVl_V4jVvVGW%WC=WZ>WiMW!RWpWtWvXo2XI7X9XEXQXRXbXcXsXZY\YoY#Y#Yr.Y2Y>YKY#QYQYdaYgYoYrY Z3 Z3!Z2*Z1Z?9Z}_Z*wZzZp[P[ [d[![)[-[.[(=[0Q[d[j[\ \w\\*\,\Z9\S\]\`\n\Jo\|\U] ]]]*] "].]N4]LC]*I] N],R]_]e],f]vq] ^^d'^(^j)^7^g^Bn^v__ _l%_&_._@_L_` `!`:`GZ`"]`q`|`~}` aga@a.a)6a:aPaRala/ra]xa_xalzab6bNb(b)b2bIHbKbdb8fbfbhblbobbc1cccc])c6c#]cPgcOd#dt:d*bd ed2edhd3jdld5ee)e,e6eFeRe0[ei\e=teu f*"f#f$f:%fDfKfPfVf!]f gvg gY g$~ghh hZ;hjBjKjfjhjijkjmj$njc}j kGk-k7/k07k-;k`=k!DkckQskkHlKlf:l:lUlz^lMmlymmmDm"mx"m#mO*m5m06m>mNmOm^mumym n` nnn0n0n>nKnWn_nknnnvo$o4ohDoUIoPo;Voeo%go2ro^to pp]-p1p%>pHp*SpTpWp1epup( qzqq$q!q/Kq{UqVq_qlqrpr{rrzr2%r%r9rG?rs]OssTs`sdmsQpst t=tt|t"tt'tl8t;t=tTBtHtRtI^tbtSwteu uU$u2(up2u3u4uNOuX^u9quvvDv"IvJv2MvzRv]vcveuvvvv]wwQ w ww:w>w"JwyRwTw0]wew{w xxix"9xGxQxVxpexd{x y y,ye>ymByKy=]y{fy>tyyazrzzJzczozDpzvzC {z{Z"{*{.{ 1{;A{bC{YJ{3M{3U{Z{+[{c{Xf{Ih{|||3|B|F|yg|&q|.}|,}]/}x4}bJ}P}i`}b}}} ~~~*:~ =~!=~?~@~{B~P~P~Q~YS~s~l|~& '2j4B%Eep~y|6=%(J49>]Y_?yY"\$) *7;B]GY[x=;;g306;>DEVcot{2W36*: AAGKbl}M#<<BOZw^`x-?&-,^[\h? =!0AG=QdiNoym k#59JR)W@\an3t4*RX+]mcghGkhm]nz?'s>lH`,jjkmlqq&sx+ANZ*iUn~( 3<69;=CP*RY[bgn}} k2wMN{UUc*gmrvY|1r  01p5z8ijlpzU{|%0%2A~FRck~wR` :(;<BGK[\Pk Q)+1.53DOV`6dqpr\!a'd)4>ʶّTf,<IabHkq6:=4GldE^ )0N[6\d,ei w%@B_c"dgau#&2-37AMU$] `pFt 9$04?tAZUpw}xKR24:`km6(fgp{z  U W"")2HDQty&4?LVm{ m#IT(1Q@pmdt 19:cBtvm++.2I:HHWc $>rA]Ncok&,!7d8;L_TCW[dk|T= 6 7-HPcctu%yi  .IGJ N^fiJnv|%b&TE8SWp qOu|D}~Sc' IYOWWmIs!uy|!1NRT'WY]Vd[ >ݴ9٦ܰ!$3/455NOP0]fn 58C|o h%04J49Arf|)2>6IS#X_c+ I28t /:fPo2JJVY 'i%4{8Crrf ,.6V<>P^&e]v N(6PKU\egqo."4DDO^do@~ 0?{5K6eQWX&ghr;ss0y|'*}9;FH\\sd ,0z2 CDElHEXl)n%x'T/AEjIFJ[l({ 805;BMS@V']b| |%IJaaj3mn(#54{MFequz j![03FMMT]d@ir3"*BOS"W?xl #%&0`5B(HLOVWogqhr|{ B$'O.k/036H?]BBC@CoNp*Z*IYi4jsJvvwnyZ97#?()^,37D,OZd# 2V==KWyX^`dzwxZ  "&&41j5 C%CYO[{AE ~0:FJSZh@jyV&|+<@ \_o3qXxkn&CC?DPaQWU2|W# 0[0DJ[aViq jt&36:8G7I~\we ~ U"4X6w?\EWW_t%b B+(A&DWN Rdi8w|xx6 (4JiN^_p[t}m@{.D7;LL]RUc l{n} E>Vc j@N!%M24>Ol$.1077799ɳqs)1?C+ʱ±!*'&&<=0?CH``h m,q3 <P=NCIMVdH2!<?oqqq " Z$4i\`Gccigos|J/36<:F@yWZbiBjOjq| )_BKYZjh--I$LTVYqEs[, @/26;@F:IONQ'`b;v'0FT)]{N 1J;6KS[\^v#.d@@_K0t~.P2O4?%JY;7#DhR~]ipqv}Pu'*=4@]JJPrt7=T%X<eDFeh.y09o?TXg3rz r##477KMSVFaZj?qnz 9#$N& 45BBR\b_kffnw&]4@LDMWio <z!"$&/Q]a^oi!A7]FUX&~ x >HP:mn )M-<EBI['..0178LxZ]_ilmUwv$<88;#Q\aTbflN0O%b/9Wk`a)dedklLq $QUe9g1i.57C@mG*_Jjz.4EZ  ,<]\MeGjnhotYy#=-1sHHINTcIdloo8:)H_cO%{%g(x5NPT WW@Y[orb.2p)<6:RV"?1 $2 >No_mFyy)24`8FKuoBqN 27s?d{s f&eO_%devs@hh@hhʐ@Unknown G* Times New Roman5Symbol3. * Arial7.{ @Calibri71 Courier5. *aTahoma7.  Verdana7K@Cambria?= * Courier New;WingdingsA BCambria Math"qhݪ&ݪ&a{ I{ I824d[[ 3qHX)?@Z2! xxWESTERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY Annette Hamm Annette HammH          Oh+'0 $ D P \ ht|WESTERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITYAnnette Hamm Normal.dotmAnnette Hamm2Microsoft Office Word@Ik@6B@n<@n< {՜.+,D՜.+,` hp  鶹 Illinois UniversityI[ WESTERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY Title 8@ _PID_HLINKSAl ~0http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/ilcs/ilcs4.asp?DocName=011006900HArt.+35&ActID=1140&ChapterID=18&SeqStart=100000&SeqEnd=3596875!~0http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/ilcs/ilcs4.asp?DocName=011006900HArt.+35&ActID=1140&ChapterID=18&SeqStart=100000&SeqEnd=3596875!  !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=>?@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_`abcdefhijklmnopqrstuvwxyz{|}~Root Entry F !1TablegrWordDocument7SummaryInformation(DocumentSummaryInformation8CompObjy  F'Microsoft Office Word 97-2003 Document MSWordDocWord.Document.89q