ࡱ> ` lbjbj 1F%j j j j j j j ~ FYFYFY8~YZ~ ZZ"ZZZ[[[vxxxxxx$ͣh5j )e[[)e)ej j ZZ'k'k'k)ej Zj Zv'k)ev'k'k>j j ZZ FYf,vǡ0ŦmhbŦXŦj [M^'k'`|a[[[jX[[[)e)e)e)e~ ~ ~ *4D%~ ~ ~ 4~ ~ ~ j j j j j j  WESTERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY Regular Meeting of the FACULTY SENATE Tuesday, 26 April 2005 4:00 p.m. Capitol Rooms - University Union A C T I O N M I N U T E S MEMBERS PRESENT: Mr. Adkins, Ms. Allen, Mr. Blankenship, Mr. Brice, Mr. Callister, Mr. DeVolder, Mr. Durkin, Mr. Erdmann, Mr. Espahbodi, Ms. Jelatis, Ms. Livingston-Webber, Ms. Mahoney, Ms. McCain, Mr. Meegan, Ms. Shouse, Ms. Thomas, Mr. Thompson, Ms. Wolf, Ms. Young Ex-officio: Karen Mann, Parliamentarian; Joseph Rallo, Provost MEMBERS ABSENT: Mr. Bacon, Mr. Bennett, Mr. Radlo GUESTS: Barb Baily, Lori Baker-Sperry, Ginny Boynton, John Chisholm, Ken Clontz, Judi Dallinger, Al DeRoos, Sharon Evans, Ken Hawkinson, Tom Helm, Hoyet Hemphill, W. Buzz Hoon, Tej Kaul, Candace McLaughlin, Don Nelson, Joe Rives, Steve Rock, Jim Schmidt, Lance Ternasky, Morris Vos I. Consideration of Minutes 12 April 2005 APPROVED AS DISTRIBUTED II. Announcements Approvals from the Provost Requests for New Courses a. AAS 445, Critical Issues in the Education of African Americans, 3 s.h. b. CH 400, Grant Writing, 3 s.h. c. CS 440, Ethics in Information Technology, 3 s.h. d. ENG 482, Life Writing, 3 s.h. e. SOC 272, Individual and Society, 3 s.h. 2. Request for Inclusion in General Education a. SOC 272, Individual and Society, 3 s.h. Request for New Degree Program a. Bachelor of Music B. Provosts Report Provost Rallo announced that the four vice presidents presented the Academic Master Plans for their areas last week, and these recommendations will now be tied into the Universitys budget. The Provost thanked senators for their support of Amtrak, and informed them that President Goldfarb and others are traveling to Chicago on May 11 to an Amtrak Rally Day event at Union Station. Provost Rallo has been appointed to the statewide Diversifying Higher Education Faculty in Illinois program board and will travel to Naperville for the first meeting next week. In regards to a memo from Provost Rallo to Members of the Deans Council on evaluation criteria and procedures for faculty promotion and tenure, Dr. Rallo stated that the discussion is a response to a number of requests from faculty to revisit the departmental criteria. In the memo, the Provost asks deans to initiate a review of the provisions in Article 20 of the UPI contract which states that each department shall have a statement of Department Criteria, describing the standards, materials, methods, procedures, to be used in evaluating performance of employees eligible for retention, tenure, promotion, and Professional Achievement Awards. One senator inquired whether the last paragraph of the memo, which asks that deans be prepared to recommend common elements in all Department Criteria as related to the performance of assigned professional responsibilities as provided for by 20.4(c)(2) means that a set of criteria will be developed that all departments will have. The Provost responded that there is currently no standard by college, and deans, chairs, and faculty have expressed concern regarding this fact, so the review is intended as a way to determine if there are basic standards across the board. A senator stated there needs to be some structure that would allow for conversations across colleges if there is to be a universal commonality. Chairperson Blankenship reminded senators that this review is not part of the negotiations process, and he recommended that senators look closely at Section 20.4 of the contract. He said he sees the review as having a bottom up and top down aspect. One senator from the College of Education and Human Services asked Provost Rallo to encourage sensitivity to the progress that has been made in recent years regarding departmental recommendations and sensitivity as to faculty input within departments, and to realize that not all chairs are agreeable to faculty input into these discussions. She stated there needs to be possibilities for all faculty to participate without negative impact. Provost Rallo responded there are efforts underway at various levels to have a mix of internal and external input and to allow new voices to be heard. He feels the review should not be controversial or angst-driven, but that there is a need to look at where the University should be in this process. C. SGA Report None Other Announcements Chairperson Blankenship announced that all of the appointments have now been made to the Subcommittee to Determine Implementation of a Foreign Language/Global Issues Requirement, and the subcommittee will begin meeting on Friday. CAGAS appointees to the subcommittee are David Connelly, Ken Mietus, and John Miller. CGE appointed David Lane, Lori Baker-Sperry, and Ginny Boynton to the subcommittee. And CIE has named Fred Isele, Tom Tomlinson, and Chandra Amaravadi as their appointees. Chairperson Blankenship informed senators that President Goldfarb has approved plus-minus grading as recommended by Faculty Senate, utilizing System B and to be implemented after the Universitys conversion to DBII. Chairperson Blankenship told senators that Amtrak support letters have been mailed to Senators Lane Evans, John Sullivan and Barack Obama; Representative Rich Myers; House Speaker Michael Madigan; House Minority Leader Tom Cross; Senate President Emil Jones; Senate Minority Leader Frank Watson; Governor Rod Blagojevich; and President George Bush. The letter has also been posted to the Senates webpages. Chairperson Blankenship thanked outgoing senators whose terms are expiring for their service to Faculty Senate. They are Senators Bacon, Brice, Callister, Durkin, Espahbodi, Mahoney, Radlo, and Thomas. Strategic Planning as Related to External Reporting (Joe Rives, Assistant to the President for Budget and Planning) Dr. Rives distributed a draft copy of a document outlining 鶹s FY 2005 Performance Report. He explained that under Illinoiss Commitment to Statewide Strategic Planning for Higher Education, all state universities are required to complete and submit an annual performance report on six goals: economic development, partnerships, affordability, access and diversity, high quality, and accountability and productivity. Dr. Rives proposes to write the report using 鶹s Higher Values in Higher Education as a base of expectations, and he stated that while this year some goals will be stretched and others will be more realistic, he expects to refine the goals so that they are measurable and achievable for the following year. Dr. Rives plans to return to Faculty Senate in fall and in March of every year to present Strategic Plan updates and to discuss the interrelationships between existing processes and Strategic Plan structures. He proposes to take all of the implementation team reports and to work closely with the Vice Presidents to see where the recommendations will fit into their areas and who has responsibility administratively and academically, while working within the shared governance system. Dr. Rives also plans to develop an interactive website so that interested persons can monitor the progress of the Strategic Plan and provide input. Chairperson Blankenship asked if the administration would be willing to hear suggestions as to revising indicators, and Provost Rallo responded that as it is a process of continuous improvement, that needs to happen. When asked if Dr. Rives had considered the feasibility of the Strategic Plan recommendations in light of current resources, he responded that in his opinion the Plan needs to go on a diet because it would cost an enormous amount to implement all of the recommendations. Dr. Rives feels the institution needs to articulate its highest priority goals, and reiterated that faculty and staff salaries has been stated by the President and in the Strategic Plan as being considered above all other items. He explained that highest priority actionable items need to be determined and then finite resources allocated to those items first. He expects to present cost estimates for the highest priorities of the Plan this summer. Dr. Rives stated he would look toward the Presidents fall address, the Vice Presidents priorities, and faculty-staff input percolating up for input into the process. III. Reports of Committees and Councils A. Council on Admission, Graduation, and Academic Standards (Steve Rock, Chair) Procedural 鶹 to Grade Appeal Policy and Student Academic Integrity Policy CAGAS Chair Steve Rock presented a proposal for revision of the recently-approved policies which 1) would give college-level appeals 20 days for completion rather than ten days and 2) would make it clear that it is up to the student bringing the appeal to take it to the next level if it is not approved, such as if the appeal is supported at the departmental and/or college level but the instructor does not appeal to the next level and does not change the grade. Dr. Rock stated the student responsibility for carrying forward the appeal has been implicit in the policies in the past, but CAGAS felt it should be made more explicit. NO OBJECTIONS 2. 鶹 in Honors College Participation and Graduation Recognition Requests from the Centennial Honors College to establish three levels within the honors curriculum and to increase the grade point average for students transferring into the program from 3.3 to 3.4 were endorsed by CAGAS on April 7. Director of the Honors College Tom Helm explained that three levels of participation are being proposed: a four-year program beginning with the General Honors Seminar and culminating with Honors in the major; Upper Division Honors, which would include the appropriate discipline-specific requirements in the major and GH 299; and Lower Division Honors, which would include two general honors seminars, an honors section of FYE, and GH 299. Dr. Helm explained that the two highest levels are already in place within the Honors Program, but the change would enable students completing Honors requirements for their first two years to also receive recognition of their efforts. Dr. Helm told senators there about 500 students participating in the Honors Program at this time. He said the changes outlined will probably not impact their numbers greatly; what will increase enrollment to a greater extent will be the creation of a Quad Cities-specific Upper Division Honors Program. NO OBJECTIONS B. Council on Curricular Programs and Instruction (W. Buzz Hoon, Chair) Requests for New Courses a. IM 315, Analytical Report Writing in Business, 3 s.h. b. ITT 433, Instructional Three-Dimensional Modeling and Animation, 3 s.h. NEW COURSES APPROVED Request for Minor a. Photographic Media Instructional Technology and Telecommunications Change: In Open Electives, indicate that ITT 310 is a WID course by a plus sign (+). PHOTOGRAPHIC MEDIA APPROVED WITH CHANGE Request for Change in Minor a. Electronic Imagery Instructional Technology and Telecommunications Change: In Summary of 鶹, add that ITT 340 was dropped and that ITT 221, 250, and 440 were added. ELECTRONIC IMAGERY APPROVED WITH CHANGE Professional Writing English and Journalism PROFESSIONAL WRITING APPROVED Council on General Education (Lori Baker-Sperry, Chair) Moratorium on Multicultural Review and on Inclusion of Multicultural General Education Classes In a memorandum to Faculty Senate, CGE Chair Lori Baker-Sperry explained that a moratorium on the multicultural goal review was sought until a decision is reached on the foreign language/global issues requirement for the following reasons: The foreign language/global issues requirement has the propensity to significantly impact the multicultural goal review, particularly if separate multicultural and cross-cultural perspectives are to be designated as such. CGE anticipates that as a result of recent University-wide dialogue on the importance of multiculturalism, there may be an extensive consideration of the category. The memorandum further recommends a moratorium on inclusion of new courses into the multicultural category of Gen Ed for the following reasons: Concerns have been expressed that with the original implementation of the graduation requirement for 3 s.h. from the multicultural category, some courses may have initially been included in this category that do not best represent General Education. Although the concerns may be ill-founded and will not necessarily result in recommendation for removal from the multicultural category, there is need for a careful consideration of those courses that comprise the multicultural category in General Education. Senator Thompson stated his opinion that the moratorium is a good idea but suggested putting a moratorium on all General Education courses because there is a feeling that Gen Ed as a whole needs to be re-thought. CGE member John Chisholm stated that the Council has heard rumblings that there should be an overall review of Gen Ed, but there has been no official directive to do so, so the Council has continued working within its original framework. Both he and Dr. Baker-Sperry agreed that the Humanities review, which is nearly completed after almost two years of work, has gone well with very few problems. But Dr. Baker-Sperry pointed out that since the goal review process is very time consuming, asking the wide number of departments that would need to work through a goals review process for the multicultural category when it may very well be changed in the near future would be counterproductive. Parliamentarian Mann pointed out that the multicultural category contains 33 courses in 17 departments. Motion: For the Executive Committee for this academic year and the Executive Committee for the coming academic year to work jointly to put together a committee to initiate a comprehensive review of General Education in the fall (DeVolder/Thompson) Dr. Chisholm inquired what would be the purpose of such a review since he has not heard any particular reasons or direction for what should be looked for that would make it different from the routine goals reviews already conducted by CGE. He pointed out that CGE is charged by Faculty Senate to periodically review the philosophy and goals of General Education, and that they try as a rule not to impose new ideas but to clarify what are the ideas of the campus regarding General Education. Dr. Rives noted that in the Strategic Plan, under Excellence in Undergraduate Education, there is an action item to revitalize assessment. He encouraged CGE to consider assessment results and how they can better improve the curriculum. One senator noted that it is an opportune time to consider a review of General Education because of the establishment of the task force to consider the assessment of student learning within Gen Ed, so CGE and the task force could engage in conversations and work together rather than at cross purposes. A senator asked if the results of assessment are supposed to feed back into curriculum review, how can that strategy be possible if the assessment structure is not yet in place. But Senator Shouse, who is on the task force, responded that curricular review would be based on assessment results four years in the future. College of Arts and Sciences Associate Dean Jim Schmidt added that there is a difference between evaluation of the curriculum and assessment of the curriculum. And Dr. Chisholm pointed out that the assessment would be taking place within departments and the results would reflect primarily back into departments, which is a separate issue from a college- or University-level review of General Education. Senator Thompson stated that University librarians hear from students that there is a big disconnect between them and Gen Ed, and many students express angst and frustration at the reference desk about General Education, which they see as just anther hoop to jump through. He added that 鶹 is failing to convince the students of the value of their education. MOTION APPROVED 18 YES 0 NO 1 AB NO OBJECTIONS TO THE CGE REPORT REQUESTING A MORATORIUM Revision of the W Requirement In a memorandum to Faculty Senate, CGE Chair Lori Baker-Sperry stated that: On Thursday, April 21, 2005, the Council on General Education began reviewing the results from a questionnaire sent to chairs and advisors concerning the W requirement. With little time to fully assess the results, but a pressing need to provide enough W courses for students needing to register, the council has identified a short-term solution until such a time that a more permanent solution (such as listed more fully above) may be reached. The memo goes on to recommend that the Faculty Senate eliminate the third and fourth lines of the W requirement (鶹 Illinois University Undergraduate Catalog 2004-2005, page 58): Students may choose from either of the following two options to fulfill this requirement: 1) take courses from at least two different General Education categories, or 2) take courses from at least two different academic departments within the same General Education category. All six semester hours may not be taken from one academic department in one General Education category. Dr. Baker-Sperry told senators it was clear from advisors surveys that it is very difficult to currently schedule students into W courses and promises to become even more difficult in the fall, with half of the number of W courses previously offered and far fewer seats available. She stated that the suggestion recommended by CGE would still require students to take 6 s.h. of W coursework but may be a little more flexible in terms of accessing those courses since requiring the courses to be taken in two different departments adds even more restraints to current difficulties in registration. A senator stated that faculty should also have been surveyed by CGE as to whether the requirement should be dropped or whether they had ideas for improvement. Candace McLaughlin, Director of the University Advising and Academic Support Center and ex-officio member of CGE, reported that advisors view the recommendation from the Council as a very small solution to a very large problem and that they were hoping that the W requirement could be eliminated before the next academic year. Ms. McLaughlin told senators there are 1,000 fewer seats in W courses this fall than there were last spring. Ms. McLaughlin distributed a handout showing the number of seats in W sections dropping from 3,777 in Fall 2003 to 2,261 (based on current maximum enrollment) in Fall 2005. Dr. Chisholm stated that mostly just a couple of departments had significant decreases in W sections for this fall; he noted that Philosophy and Religious Studies offered 12 W sections this spring but only has one offered for fall. Associate Dean Schmidt plans to put a call out to departments within the College of Arts and Sciences for additional W courses. When the question was asked whether the CGE recommendation would solve the problem, Dr. Schmidt responded it would be a bandaid that would alleviate but not eliminate the problem. One senator suggested that no FYE students be put into W courses for next year since FYE courses may well replace W courses in future anyway, but Ms. McLaughlin said that would complicate registration. When asked the difference between an FYE course and a W course, Parliamentarian Mann responded that a W course requires 50 percent writing while an FYE course requires 25 percent. One senator noted that a number of the students she advises must take an extra Gen Ed course in order to meet the W requirement. Another senator noted that there seem to be increasing rules and restrictions as to what courses students must take, so that it is very complex for students and parents to determine, and just reading the WARD reports with their symbols for different types of classes is a massive undertaking. Senator Jelatis noted that just a year ago the Senate voted to eliminate the Writing Exam as a graduation requirement, partly because there were so many W components in place, but with discussion of eliminating the W requirement there is a great fear of eroding the writing program. She warned senators to be very cautious about making blanket changes because Faculty Senate should not begin dismantling these programs without considering the whole picture. Senator Jelatis added that something needs done to overhaul the W requirement, but it should not be arbitrarily dismantled at this time. Senator Shouse told senators a survey was conducted regarding eliminating the W requirement when she chaired CGE in 1999-2000, and there were very strong feelings regarding it at that time. She said she would support the CGE recommendation until such time as the General Education review can determine whether a strong writing commitment can be maintained without the W requirement. Motion: To eliminate the W requirement with the understanding that how writing fits into General Education will be part of the review that is undertaken next year (Livingston-Webber/Brice) Parliamentarian Mann noted that if students are made to take W courses over the summer and then the requirement is eliminated in the fall, it could be a PR disaster. A senator asked if students would have to continue fulfilling the requirement that was current in the catalog under which they entered 鶹. Registrar Al DeRoos responded that when the Writing Exam was eliminated, it was eliminated for students under all catalogs, and if the W requirement were eliminated it would probably be done the same way. CGE member Virginia Boynton pointed out that it was not on the Faculty Senate agenda that elimination of the W requirement was being considered, and there are a lot of constituents that havent had a chance to voice their opinions regarding the issue. SENATOR SHOUSE OBJECTED TO THE CGE REPORT Motion: To restore the report to the agenda (Livingston-Webber/Brice) MOTION TO RESTORE APPROVED 17 YES 1 NO 1 AB Parliamentarian Mann stated that the motion by Senator Livingston-Webber conflicted with the CGE report. MOTION TO ELIMINATE THE W REQUIREMENT WITHDRAWN BY SENATOR LIVINGSTON-WEBBER Motion: Until the General Education review is completed, to reduce the W requirement to one (Livingston-Webber) Senator Livingston-Webber told senators it is unconscionable for 鶹 to have a requirement for students that their schedules will not allow them to meet. MOTION DIED FOR LACK OF A SECOND In response to suggestions that FYE courses could take the place of the W requirement, Senator Adkins, who has served on the FYE Committee for three years, pointed out that the University at this time cannot make students take First Year Experience courses. Senator Jelatis stated that although faculty are supposed to be holistically incorporating writing into the curriculum, she feels that senators should accept the CGE report and not reduce W requirements in light of the next years review of General Education. Motion: To eliminate the W requirement with the understanding that how writing fits into General Education will be part of the review that is undertaken next year (Durkin/McCain) Senator DeVolder pointed out that there is a world of difference between initiating a review and eliminating a requirement today, and added that eliminating the requirement is final, with no participation outside this meeting. SENATOR MAHONEY CALLED THE QUESTION NO OBJECTIONS MOTION APPROVED 10 YES 7 NO 2 AB Committee on Committees (Darlene Young, Chair) UNIVERSITY COMMITTEES: DISTINGUISHED FACULTY LECTURER COMMITTEE Mohammad Siddiqi replacing Lisa Wen 08 A&S UNIVERSITY THEME COMMITTEE Dale Adkins replacing Gordon Rands 05-06 At-large There were no further nominations. Dale Adkins and Mohammad Siddiqi were elected by acclamation. IV. Old Business A. Revision to Policy for the Hiring of Chairs Chairperson Blankenship thanked the ad hoc committee for their hard work. He stated that President Goldfarb and Provost Rallo pointed out that in terms of representation on the search committees, they would like to see more leeway in being able to shape the representation of the committees, with the proviso that the faculty majority be maintained. Senators considered a motion to amend that was included in their packets: The following amendment has been proposed in order to promote and preserve the diversity initiatives outlined in the University Strategic Plan. It has been pointed out that the search policy approved by the Faculty Senate on March 29th does not offer the flexibility to appoint members to a search committee that would offer diverse perspectives to the search and hiring process. The proposed amendment is modeled off of the Administrative search and hire procedures that Faculty Senate carefully drafted last year. As with the Provost and Dean searches, the policy offers flexibility while maintaining strength of faculty voice. The proposed amendment appears highlighted twice, once in each portion of the policy for external and internal searches. A. External Search Process 1. After the decision to conduct an external search is made, a Search Committee shall be formed. The Search Committee shall be comprised of voting members* who are not candidates for the position from the department to which the chair will be appointed. At the discretion of the Dean from the college in which the search is being conducted, additional members may be added with the proviso that the department may appoint additional faculty members in order to maintain faculty majority. The Committee will select a chair from its membership. In the case of departments that share programs with other departments, faculty from those other departments may serve on the Search Committee as ex-officio members. B. Internal Search Process 1. After the decision to conduct an internal search is made, a Search Committee shall be formed. The Search Committee shall be comprised of voting members* of the department who are not candidates for the position. At the discretion of the Dean from the college in which the search is being conducted, additional members may be added with the proviso that the department may appoint additional faculty members in order to maintain faculty majority. The Committee will select a chair from its membership. In the case of departments that share programs with other departments, faculty from those other departments may serve on the Search Committee as ex-officio members. Senator Thompson pointed out that the 1973 department responsibilities policy says that members of the department will determine who has voting rights in that department, so he would assume they would determine who has voting rights on the chair search committees, and Provost Rallo stated that the proposed chair policy does not change that. Senator Thompson asked about ex-officio members, and Senator Shouse, who chaired the ad hoc committee that developed the proposed chair search policy, stated that the department controls who can vote. But another senator pointed out that the department decides the voting members of the department, not necessarily the voting members of the committee, who may be different than the voting members of the department. Senator Thompson, however, countered that the 1973 department responsibilities policy states that the department take care of recruitment, and a search for a chair would be part of recruitment. He told senators that the Library has 45 Civil Service employees who could be put on a search committee, and he wondered who determines if they have voting rights. He feels the faculty would determine who has voting rights on the committee since it seems to be a departmental right and obligation. Provost Rallo stated that the issue that he and the President expressed to Chairperson Blankenship is that the policy needs to be inclusive and not consign some members to second class citizenship, with rights to attend meetings but not to vote. He stated that faculty should be the majority on the chair search committee, but departments with Civil Service employees or graduate students should also include them as desired to give the committee more voices. But Senator Thompson added that senators should be careful to ensure that the faculty have the right and obligation to add additional persons to the search committee or to choose not to do so. Motion: Within the additional sentence in the external and internal search process, insert the word voting so that additional voting members may be added and insert two-thirds department so that the department may appoint additional faculty members in order to maintain two-thirds department faculty majority. (Livingston-Webber/Espahbodi) Friendly amendment: Eliminate two-thirds from the motion (Espahbodi) FRIENDLY AMENDMENT ACCEPTED SENATOR ESPAHBODI CALLED THE QUESTION NO OBJECTIONS MOTION APPROVED 18 YES 0 NO 0 AB The additional sentence in the internal and external search process paragraph of the chairs search policy will read: At the discretion of the Dean from the college in which the search is being conducted, additional voting members may be added with the proviso that the department may appoint additional faculty members in order to maintain department faculty majority. Senator Thompson asked Provost Rallo if the provisions of the policy only apply to chair searches, and the Provost responded that this policy is specific only to searches for chairs. V. New Business Motion: To continue past 6:00 p.m. (Durkin/DeVolder) MOTION APPROVED BY UNANIMOUS VOICE VOTE Statement Regarding Creation of Three Most Recent New Departments Chairperson Blankenship explained that the following statement from the Faculty Senate Executive Committee was a result of discussions that took place when considering the request for creation of a Department of Broadcasting: The Board of Trustees policies on department responsibilities ( HYPERLINK "http://www.wiu.edu/provost/facpol/resp/dpt.shtml" http://www.wiu.edu/provost/facpol/resp/dpt.shtml) approved by Faculty Senate 5/8/73, state that: The creation of a new department may be recommended by the Board of Trustees if the college governance system makes such a recommendation and, in turn, this action is also recommended by the Faculty Senate and approved by the Provost and President. The restructuring of an existing department is to be handled in a similar fashion provided the departments viewpoint is solicited in the restructuring process. It appears that three departments have been created at 鶹 in recent years without such consultation: 1995 African American Studies, was called a change in title from program to department, through a reasonable and moderate extension of existing authority. 1997 Social Work, was called a reasonable a moderate extension of existing programmatic authority and a change in title from program to department. 2005 Womens Studies, was called an administrative restructuring as part of reasonable and moderate extension of existing programmatic authority. Senator Espahbodi noted that the formal approval, after five years, of a department created under the reasonable and moderate extension provision has not been carried out in two of these cases. He pointed out that in Footnote 1 of the IBHE Request for New Administrative, Research1, or Public Service Unit, it states that Temporary approval may be sought through reasonable and moderate extension for creation of a new, formally organized, research or public service unit that has a temporary mission up to five years. Following that time period, the institution must seek permanent approval if the unit continues operation. Proposal for Creation of a Department of Broadcasting One senator stated that his concern with the creation of new departments is that in the past 鶹 tried to reduce departments and even reduced colleges from five to four, and now it seems the institution is going in the opposite direction in spite of current budgetary constraints. Motion: To approve the request for creation of a Department of Broadcasting (Thompson/Durkin) Department of Communication Chair Ken Hawkinson explained that Broadcasting is largely an autonomous unit already and is one of the largest departments on campus in terms of general education requirements and majors. He pointed out that the Broadcasting unit is physically located in a different place from the Communication Department, and they have a mission beyond the classroom as they provide news and information for media in other communities. Dr. Hawkinson added that, if approved as a department, Broadcasting would like to develop a graduate program as well. MOTION APPROVED 16 YES 0 NO 1 AB Pension Reform Letter Chairperson Blankenship told senators that a letter from Faculty Senate to Governor Blagojevich expressing deep concern with the proposed dramatic change to the state pension systems is similar to ones currently being mailed throughout the state. The letter addresses the proposed reduction of benefits for future retirees, end of career salary increases, the proposal to limit post-retirement benefits to the consumer price index or three percent (whichever is less), and the impact reductions in benefits will have on attracting quality people to state employment. Motion: To accept the pension reform letter (Brice/Jelatis) MOTION APPROVED 17 YES 0 NO 0 AB Resolution to Implement Periodic Review and Update of Computer Hardware and Software for Faculty Senate Office Chairperson Blankenship thanked the Faculty Senate Recording Secretary for her work on behalf of Faculty Senate during the past year. RATIONALE WHEREAS, the Faculty Senate is the primary body to represent the faculty of 鶹 Illinois University; and WHEREAS, the Secretary of the Faculty Senate carries out the majority of Senate paperwork; and WHEREAS, the production and editing of documents is an essential component of this work; and WHEREAS, distribution of documents and communication, in both hard copy and in various electronic formats, is necessary; and WHEREAS, the Secretary of the Faculty Senate must be able to carry out those tasks in a timely and efficient manner; RESOLUTION THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, THAT the Faculty Senate of 鶹 Illinois University calls for the implementation of periodic review and update of the equipment used by the Secretary of the Faculty Senate. In particular, this review should allow for the update of computer hardware and software in order to meet the ever-changing demands of the position. This review should be conducted every three years, beginning in Fall 2005. In addition, if circumstances demand, the Secretary of the Faculty Senate should be permitted to initiate a special review. Updates should be funded from sources outside the regular Faculty Senate budget. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, THAT this Resolution be permanently recorded in, and distributed via, the Minutes of the 鶹 Illinois University Faculty Senate. RESOLUTION APPROVED BY UNANIMOUS VOICE VOTE Resolution in Recognition of Dr. Matthew R. Blankenship RATIONALE WHEREAS, Dr. Blankenship has served as Faculty Senate Chair for Academic Years 2003/2004 and 2004/2005; and WHEREAS, he has provided leadership and strength to the Faculty Senate; and WHEREAS, he has performed in an exemplary manner as spokesperson for the Faculty Senate; and WHEREAS, his commitment to the ideals of faculty governance will be remembered well beyond his tenure at this Institution; RESOLUTION THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, THAT the Faculty Senate of 鶹 Illinois University hereby officially recognizes Dr. Matthew R. Blankenship for his distinguished service. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, THAT this Resolution be permanently recorded in, and distributed via, the Minutes of the 鶹 Illinois University Faculty Senate. RESOLUTION APPROVED BY UNANIMOUS VOICE VOTE Motion: To adjourn (Brice/DeVolder) The Faculty Senate adjourned at 6:15 p.m. Julie Mahoney, Secretary Annette Hamm Faculty Senate Recording Secretary     PAGE  PAGE 6 3ABJKLMNSX   j v ! " * + J h t  < = > B ´xxxxhtCJaJh"CJaJhSKPCJaJh_uCJaJh`CJaJh{kCJaJhki5>*CJ\aJh7056CJ\]aJhd*56CJ\]aJhki56CJ\]aJhki6CJ]aJhki5CJ\aJhkiCJaJhki+BYZd " # = > k l  & F  @&^ `  ^ `@&$a$$@&a$@&FkB Z \ ] f n      4 I M P ` a b o p y  _rwwwowohwiCJaJhCJaJh;6CJaJhh\Phv\>*CJaJh+:CCJaJhKCJaJhv\CJaJh(sCJaJhh\PhK>*CJaJh >*CJaJh`5CJ\aJhki5CJ\aJhtCJaJh`CJaJhkiCJaJhki>*CJaJ+  : n   4 I M a b !^gd`p^pgdv\ & Fgdv\gdv\p^pgd+:C ^`gdv\gd+:Cp^pgd(s & Fgd(s^ & F!bc./cgd4<gdA  & FgdA gdq^gd & Fgd p0^p`0 & Fgd{.^gd^gd^2;NOP*de NOظ谥xph`hkiCJaJh{.h{.>*hBhki>*hCJaJhkiCJaJhv\hv\CJaJhv\>*CJaJhki>*CJaJhhCJaJhKCJaJhCJaJhqCJaJh2!CJaJhO?CJaJh~CJaJh;6CJaJha9CJaJhwiCJaJh=CJaJ#st%-./cd ! !!"="F"G"V"$$-&6&&&&&&X''](ļyyyhDCJaJhdVCJaJhbIKCJaJh]CJaJhizCJaJh qCJaJh{.CJaJh"0:hA CJaJh"0:CJaJhh\Ph"0:>*CJaJh4<CJaJhA CJaJh[CJaJh;6CJaJhCJaJhqCJaJ,c^(_((((((*)+)++++]gdr]^`gdr p]^pgdr ]^gdr & F]gdr ]^ & F] & F  0^ `0gd"0:^gd"0: h^`hgd"0:](^(_(d(((((((((((*)E)d)e)f)++++++,,~...000Žxph``Xph95CJaJh)CJaJh*CJaJh&CJaJhh\Ph&>*CJaJhr5CJaJhrhr5CJaJhizCJaJhh\Phr>*CJaJhrCJaJhJCJaJh_~CJaJh_~h_~>*CJaJhki5CJ\aJhki>*CJaJhkiCJaJhkiCJaJh"0:h"0:CJaJ ++,000011131l111111 h^`hgdt^gd ^gd95 & FgdYN ]^ ]^]^`gdiz p]^pgd*]gdr00000111'1213161c1k1l1o111111111111)2*2,232R2T22ѽɩxѽlɩɩc[hizCJaJh955CJaJhh\Ph95>*CJaJhki5CJ\aJht5CJ\aJh955CJ\aJhUoCJaJh CJaJh95CJaJhh\PhYN>*CJaJhh\Phki>*CJaJhkiCJaJhki>*CJaJhJCJaJh_~CJaJhiz5CJaJhrhiz5CJaJ!1*2+22222233y3z333333 p@&^pgdtV @&^gdtV & F @&gdtV @&gd95 p^pgd95 @&^gd95 & F @&gd95 @&gd ^222222222222333x3y3|3333333333źА|qhZNEh >*CJaJh95h95CJ\aJhtVhtV5CJ\aJhtVCJ\aJhtV5CJ\aJhtVCJaJhtVhtV5CJaJh95CJaJh95CJ\aJhh\Ph95>*CJ\aJh 5CJ\aJh955CJ\aJhki5CJ\aJh955CJaJhizhiz5CJaJh0k%CJaJhCJaJh95h95CJaJ334,4-444}5[6677899= p]^pgd & F]gd|}u p]^pgd|}u]gd|}u & F]gd|}u p]^pgdtV ]^gdtV & F]gd&E^ & F @&^gd9533444#4,4-4444|5}5889c:;;;;<<<<.<O<V<i<u<<<<<<<<<<<<==||||ttlh[qCJaJhH;CJaJh<CJaJh|aCJaJhCJaJhdCJaJhCJaJh|}uCJaJhtVCJaJhizh >*CJaJhizhtV>*CJaJhCJaJh CJaJhkiCJaJhki>*CJaJh >*CJaJh>*CJaJ*====\>h>~>>>>>n@o@BBBBBBB&D(DFFFG2G3G4GTGK>LDLILRLRMMNNǿϿϿϿϿǷ~~~vnfhJCJaJh CJaJh4CJaJhYCJaJhWy/CJaJhh\PhtV>*CJaJhtVCJaJhB5CJaJhBhB5CJaJhBCJaJh VCJaJh~^CJaJhH;CJaJhJCJaJhO?CJaJh[q5CJaJh[qCJaJhCJaJ&==}>~>o@p@FFFF3G4GTGUGGH_I`I8]8gdWy/ 8@ ]8^@ gdWy/ @ ]^@ gdWy/ p]^pgdWy/]gdWy/ & F]gd&E ]^gdtV p]^pgd`IKKNNTTYVZV9Z:ZZZ^^-^.^t^u^^^__^_ Lp]L^pgd7 Lp]L^pgdJp^pgdJ Lp]L^pgd;p^pgdWy/N+O,O^OP"P#PQQqRsR(SSSTTT2UCVKVXVYVZViV*XXX8Z9Z:ZBZZ]]]^^^-^.^6^u^^^РРР{r{rhO5CJaJhOhO5CJaJhCJaJh5CJaJh CJaJhCJaJh5cCJaJh;CJaJhCJaJh>;CJaJhOCJaJh9CJaJh26CJaJh]CJaJhiMCJaJhJCJaJh7CJaJ+^^___^___g____q`r`s```Sa`agakabbbbWcgc9d:d;ddddd۾ۢۢ}uiu`Xh CJaJh >*CJaJhY>'hY>'5CJaJhY>'CJaJhCJaJh1rCJaJhg5CJaJhghg6CJaJhgCJaJhX5CJaJhXhXCJaJhXCJaJhO5CJaJhOhO5CJaJhOCJaJh;h;CJaJh;CJaJh;5CJaJ ^_____r`s```bbVcWc:d;d_d`dndodddddd `!@^!`@gd> ^gdtV & Fgd&E Lp]L^pgdg Lp]L^pgd7dddddddee ee5e6e8eSeeeeeeeeeeeeeffff貨螨xkg_gZVRh hu hu>*hh\Phki>*hkih> htVCJ^JaJhWy/CJ^JaJh:htV5CJ^JaJhtVhtV>*CJ^JaJh> CJ^JaJhtVCJ^JaJh CJ^JaJh> h> >*CJ^JaJh> h> 5>*CJ^JaJh> h> 5CJ^JaJh> h> CJ^JaJhtVh> CJaJddde6e7eSeeeeeff1f2fggVjWj p]^pgd^gdgd & F]gdtV ``^``gd  ^`gd gd>  ``^``gdtVf0f1f2fgghhjjkl mmmnovrns1tttwwwwwwwwnxtxxxyyyyJy]yyyyyy zz}{{{8|9|:|=|J|ƽƵƵƵƪƵƵƥơ hki>*hki hh-_ h_m]hDUhDU h_m]>*hL h_m]h_m]h_m]h_m]5 h_m]5h_h_m]h)eVh74 h-_>* h>*h-_hhH*hh h8>* hu>* h>*6WjjjjmmmsptpwwIyJyyyyyyyyy z zzz^gd-_]gd-_ p]^pgd-_ p]^pgdz{{9|:|J|K|||||||}}~~PQ t"8p]8^pgdH p]^pgdH^gdH^gdkK & F gdg p]^pgd^gd-_J|K|L|T|||||||~~P~Q~R~~~~Qۀ[kLԃՃ345QY^ϻ׶׮׮׮תדxh`wh`w5h`w h!5 h!>* h >* hHhHhS|hS|hS|H*hKh!hHhH5 hH6h`hH0JjhHUjhHUhH hkK>* hg>*hghDUhDU5 hDU5hDU hDU>*/YZ45PQ*^gdDUgd!^gd!^gd! & F gdg^gd  @ &8]8^gdH @ t"8p]8^pgdH)*+efgo|‹Njɋʋˋ:SŒՌ;Cwv@Ayz?GŽŹűűűűűűűũŽhh\Phh\Phs5hh\Phh\P5hsh_5hh\Ph_5hshh\Ph_>*h_ h_5h_h_5h_hPb5 hPb5hbhPbh`wh`whDU>*hDUhDU>*:*+fgʋˋ:;Œ̌͌:;vw^gd_gd_ & F gd_^gd`wgd`wuv@Ayz>?$%Δϔlm^gds^gds & F gd_^gd_^gd_GDϔmEFGIJLMOPRSYZ[]^defghjklкhO?0JmHnHuh; h;0Jjh;0JUhT0jhT0U hkiCJhh\PCJaJhCJaJhkiCJaJhki5CJ\aJh hh\P5hshh\P5hh\Phh\P5hh\P*m FHIKLN & F p@ @&^` & F p@ P@&^`P & F p@ P^`P & F & F@&p^pgd^gdh\PNOQR[\]hijkl&`#$ / 01h/ =!"#$h% 9DyK 1http://www.wiu.edu/provost/facpol/resp/dpt.shtmlyK bhttp://www.wiu.edu/provost/facpol/resp/dpt.shtml@@@ NormalCJ_HaJmH sH tH P@P Heading 1$ & F @& >*CJaJR@R Heading 2$ & F@&^5CJ\aJH@H Heading 3$ & F@& >*CJaJJ@J Heading 4$ & F@&5CJ\aJZ@Z Heading 5$ & F@&]^5CJ\aJDA@D Default Paragraph FontVi@V  Table Normal :V 44 la (k@(No List XOX Level 17$8$H$^OJQJ_HaJmH sH tH XOX Level 4@ 7$8$H$^@ OJQJ_HaJmH sH tH XOX Level 3p7$8$H$^pOJQJ_HaJmH sH tH XO"X Level 57$8$H$^OJQJ_HaJmH sH tH XC@2X Body Text Indent ^ >*CJaJ6B@B6 Body TextCJaJ4 @R4 Footer  !.)@a. Page NumberXR@rX Body Text Indent 2 & F^CJaJ6U@6 Hyperlink >*B*phXS@X Body Text Indent 3 & F^CJaJB>@B Title$L^La$5CJ\aJFV@F FollowedHyperlink >*B* phZYZ  Document Map-D M CJOJQJ^JaJlBYZd"#=>kl:n4IMab !bc./c^ _ *!+!#####$(((()))3)l))))))**+******++y+z+++++++,,,-,,,}-[..//01155}6~6o8p8>>>>3?4?T?U??@_A`ACCFFLLYNZN9R:RRRVV-V.VtVuVVVWW^W_WWWrXsXXXZZV[W[:\;\_\`\n\o\\\\\\\\]6]7]S]]]]]^^1^2^__VbWbbbbeeeshthooIqJqqqqqqqqq r rrrss9t:tJtKtttttttuuvvPxQxxxYyZyyyzz||4}5}P~Q~~~*+fgʃ˃:;„̄̈́:;vwuv@Ayz>?$%Όόlm FHIKLNOQR[\]hijm0000B000d0d0d0d0d0d0d00000000 0 0 00 0000000000 000000000000000 00 00 00 00 00 00000 0 0000 000000000000000 000000 0000000 0000+000 0000 0+0+0+ 0++0+0+ 0+ 0+0+0+ 0+ 0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+ 0++0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+ 0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+ 0+ 0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+ 0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+ 0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+ 0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+ 0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+ 0+0000000000000000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 00@0y00@0y00@0y00@0y00@0@0@0@0@0@0y00LBYZd"#=>kl:n4IMab !bc./c^ _ *!+!#####$(((()))3)l))))))**+******++y+z+++++++,,,-,,,}-[..//01155}6~6o8p8>>>>3?4?T?U??@_A`ACCFFLLYNZN9R:RRRVV-V.VtVuVVVWW^W_WWWrXsXXXZZV[W[:\;\_\`\n\o\\\\\\\\]6]7]S]]]]]^^1^2^__VbWbbbbeeeshthooIqJqqqqqqqqq r rrrss9t:tJtKtttttttuuvvPxQxxxYyZyyyzz||4}5}P~Q~~~*+fgʃ˃:;„̄̈́:;vw m0P000B000d0d0d0d0d0d0d00000000 0o 0o 0o0o 0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o 0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o 0o0o 0o0o 0o0o 0o0o 0o0o 0o0o0o0o0o 0o 0o0o0o0o 0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o0o 0o0o0o0o0o0o 0o0o0o0o000 0000*000 0000 0+0+0+ 0++0+0+ 0+ 0+0+0+ 0+ 0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+ 0++0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+ 0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+ 0+ 0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+ 0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+ 0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+ 0 0 0 0? 0 0l 00 $$$'B ](023=N^dfJ|GlLORSUWY[\_`bdgil !c+13=`I^_dWjz*mNlMPQTVXZ]^acefhjkmnkNvQvvlX  '!!8@0(  B S  ?/96#:6;6<6 =6>6t?6̔@6DA6 ,B6 <#C6\D6ܡ#E6 LF6t'wG64H6I6tJ6܄K6!L6M6A#N6F#O6]P6YQ6WR6lVS6,UT6 U6V6\W6<X6Y64Z6}[6x{\6]6w{^6d5_6|#`6TSa6|v{b6Tc6d6$e6f6tg6t/7J>hhQQ]t###$$$$$,,;;;?FFFFF9J9JDJ!*m      !"#&$%')(*+-,.HWFrr [[n""###$#$+$+$#,,;;;?FFFFF@JHJHJ )44m   !"#%&$')(*+-,.:*urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttagsStreet=,*urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags PlaceType=.*urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags PlaceName;*urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttagsaddress9%*urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttagsStateh&*urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttagsCity0http://www.5iamas-microsoft-com:office:smarttagsV/*urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttagsplacehttp://www.5iantlavalamp.com/V**urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags PersonNamehttp://www.microsoft.com //..,/***/&%/&/,.**/%/.,/..,**/,.**/..,/,../.,18ntz!05y)/GMNSX` d6h6j6r6M;S;bNiN2P9PPPATGTYY_[g[]]*]-]s]x]]] jjwttFFHHIIKLNOQRjm38:?nt3)8)l)r)5|6:;==>>@"@VVv\\-]5]s]x]haayooqqxxgylyyzFFHHIIKLNOQRjm3333333333333333333333333d e 6 6\6h6::::::;;~;~;&<(<CC>DDDIDRDFF G G+G,GLLCNKNUUVWWWSY`YjjkkllooooppqqvvzL{{{{{{{|EFFHHIIKLNOQRZ]gmFFHHIIKLNOQRjmR,W72R$(J Xt> P"l)'Da$\T2$|<5=t&NY@(JqHdu]{H/QiR[HWR,)*o(.^`o(. L ^ `L.  ^ `.xx^x`.HLH^H`L.^`.^`.L^`L.h@ @ ^@ `OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHohPP^P`OJQJo(hHh  ^ `OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh!!^!`OJQJo(hH0^`0o(.p0p^p`0o(. 0 ^ `0o(.0^`0o(.xx^x`.HLH^H`L.^`.^`.L^`L.0^`0o(.p0p^p`0o(. L ^ `L.  ^ `.xx^x`.HLH^H`L.^`.^`.L^`L.0^`0o(.h^`OJQJo(hH  L ^ `LhH.   ^ `hH. xx^x`hH. HLH^H`LhH. ^`hH. ^`hH. L^`LhH.pp^p`o(.@ @ ^@ `.L^`L.^`.^`.L^`L.PP^P`.  ^ `.L^`L.h pp^p`hH.h @ @ ^@ `hH.h L^`LhH.h ^`hH.h ^`hH.h L^`LhH.h PP^P`hH.h   ^ `hH.h L^`LhH.p0p^p`0o(.@ 0@ ^@ `0o(.  L ^ `LhH. xx^x`hH. HH^H`hH. L^`LhH. ^`hH. ^`hH. L^`LhH.h@ @ ^@ `OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHohPP^P`OJQJo(hHh  ^ `OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh!!^!`OJQJo(hHpp^p`o(. @ @ ^@ `hH. L^`LhH. ^`hH. ^`hH. L^`LhH. PP^P`hH.   ^ `hH. L^`LhH.pp^p`o(. @ @ ^@ `hH. L^`LhH. ^`hH. ^`hH. L^`LhH. PP^P`hH.   ^ `hH. L^`LhH.h@ @ ^@ `OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHohPP^P`OJQJo(hHh  ^ `OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh!!^!`OJQJo(hHpp^p`o(.@ @ ^@ `.L^`L.^`.^`.L^`L.PP^P`.  ^ `.L^`L.p0p^p`0o(.@ 0@ ^@ `0o(. L ^ `L.xx^x`.HH^H`.L^`L.^`.^`.L^`L.88^8`o(.^`. L ^ `L.  ^ `.xx^x`.HLH^H`L.^`.^`.L^`L.^`o(.   ^ `hH.  L ^ `LhH. xx^x`hH. HH^H`hH. L^`LhH. ^`hH. ^`hH. L^`LhH.pp^p`o(. @ @ ^@ `hH. L^`LhH. ^`hH. ^`hH. L^`LhH. PP^P`hH.   ^ `hH. L^`LhH.L p'Da$ P"$4Z6\5='.]gt r2$&NY@JqHl|2iR XR,Wu]{H)'*`[.{.Wy/T0 y0'.1714+4?495*626;6_6}77K8I 9"0:<< =O?R?+:CD_YD'FmG~1HUEHkKv1KbIKiMOSKPh\PdP4QMSDUdV)eV \v\_m]3^~^_-_7_|abPbD}ckiwi^j%mjnaun q[qpq(sGst,TuJku|}uVuw y$?zS|_~V1nYtm B:a9>;U_uW3ULKN8KYNtV. oY^9,;_J(MS ]t}@izgA i4[.[m.18qt X %_)=.~t VJR4<U1%Jm8]d5c1rTg74&Wk /\3 or Csxp> 70& 6BM cStH;` s1]H>Uoc@h6h6/h6h6l@@UnknownG: Times New Roman5Symbol3& : Arial5Shruti71 Courier5& zaTahoma?5 z Courier New;Wingdings"1hڔf&&F < yH< yH!4d 2QKP?(M2WESTERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY Annette Hamm Annette HammX              Oh+'0 ,8 X d p |WESTERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITYAnnette Hamm Normal.dotAnnette Hamm70Microsoft Office Word@:o@py@D@K@^< y՜.+,D՜.+,` hp  鶹 Illinois UniversityH WESTERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY Title 8@ _PID_HLINKSA 1http://www.wiu.edu/provost/facpol/resp/dpt.shtml@   !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=>?@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_`abcdefghijklmnoqrstuvwyz{|}~Root Entry F5Data p1TablexWordDocument1SummaryInformation(DocumentSummaryInformation8CompObjq  FMicrosoft Office Word Document MSWordDocWord.Document.89q