ࡱ > , bjbj 7 %
8 / D` R " _ _ _ _ _ _ _ $ b 8e _ _ _ h% h% h% _ h% _ h% h% O D gS ̞ #Q & _ ` 0 D` IQ e " ~ e L gS e gS H h% _ _ 8$ 0 D` e
: WESTERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY
Regular Meeting of the FACULTY SENATE
Tuesday, 29 April 2008
3:30 p.m.
Capitol Rooms - University Union
A C T I O N M I N U T E S
SENATORS PRESENT: L. Baker-Sperry, C. Blackinton, V. Boynton, L. Brice, K. Clontz, J. Clough, D. Connelly, K. Daytner, J. Deitz, S. Edsall, K. Hall, R. Hironimus-Wendt, V. Jelatis, M. Maskarinec, L. Meloy, N. Miczo, D. Mummert, R. Orwig, C. Pynes, S. Rock, M. Siddiqi, B. Sonnek
Ex-officio: Jack Thomas, Provost; T. Kaul, Parliamentarian
SENATORS ABSENT: None
GUESTS: Barb Baily, Judi Dallinger, Dennis DeVolder, Richard Filipink, Diane Hamilton-Hancock, Phyllida Kornoski, Fred May, Jennifer McNabb, Moises Molina, Lea Monahan, Michael Murray, Kathy Neumann, Tere North, Nancy Parsons, Polly Radosh, Jim Schmidt, Bill Thompson, Charles Wright
I. Consideration of Minutes 15 April 2008
APPROVED AS DISTRIBUTED
II. Announcements
A. Resolution to Honor Outgoing Faculty Senate Chair Steve Rock
Vice Chair Connelly read a Resolution in Recognition of Exceptional Service by Dr. Steven M. Rock, Chair of the Faculty Senate, 2005-2008:
RATIONALE WHEREAS, Dr. Rock was voted Faculty Senate Chair for Academic Years 2005/2006 through 2007/2008; and
WHEREAS, he leaves this office with the distinction of having served the longest continuous term in the history of the 鶹 Illinois University Faculty Senate; and WHEREAS, he has provided exemplary leadership and service to the Faculty Senate; and WHEREAS, he has performed in an outstanding manner as spokesperson for the Faculty Senate; and WHEREAS, his commitment to the ideals of faculty governance will serve as a long-lasting model for future Senators; RESOLUTION NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT the Faculty Senate of 鶹 Illinois University hereby officially recognizes Dr. Steven M. Rock for his distinguished service to the Faculty Senate and to 鶹 Illinois University. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, THAT this Resolution be permanently recorded in, and distributed via the Minutes of the 鶹 Illinois University Faculty Senate.
B. Approvals from the Provost
1. Requests for New Courses
a. ENGR 251, Strength of Materials, 3 s.h.
b. ENGR 311, Fluid Dynamics, 3 s.h.
c. ENGR 330, Engineering Economics, 3 s.h.
d. ENGR 331, Engineering Project Planning, 3 s.h.
e. ENGR 471, Microelectronic Circuits, 3 s.h.
f. ENGR 478, Industrial Controls, 3 s.h.
g. ENGR 499, Senior Design, 2 s.h. (repeatable to 4 s.h.)
h. MUS 499, Vocal Literature and Pedagogy, 3 s.h.
i. THEA 499, BFA Senior Project, 3 s.h.
j. UNIV 099, BOT/BA Prior Learning Portfolio Tutorial, 0 s.h.
2. Request for Change in Minor
a. Marketing
3. Requests for 鶹 in Majors
a. Board of Trustees Bachelor of Arts Degree Program
b. Musical Theatre
4. Request for New Major
a. Engineering
C. Provosts Report
Provost Thomas thanked senators for their hard work and dedication toward making 鶹 Illinois University a great place to be. He said he appreciates hearing senators concerns as 鶹 is an institution that believes in shared governance and open communication. Provost Thomas told senators he came up through the faculty ranks before attaining his current position, including at one point serving as faculty senate chair, so he appreciates the differences and comments that are expressed at Senate meetings. The Provost also thanked Chairperson Rock for his guidance and leadership and for helping with Provost Thomass transition to 鶹. The Provost related that at his previous institutions, administrators were not expected to participate at senate meetings, so he has appreciated senators patience as he adjusts to his role as an ex-officio and participating member of Faculty Senate. He assured senators that issues and concerns brought up at Senate meetings will be brought to the forefront in administrative discussions.
The academic honors convocation will be held at 2:00 p.m. on May 9, followed by the graduate hooding ceremony and commencement at 5:30 p.m. Undergraduate commencement on the Macomb campus will be held on May 10, with ceremonies at 9:30 a.m., 1:00 p.m., and 4:00 p.m. Undergraduate and graduate commencement ceremonies will be held on the Quad Cities campus at 3:00 p.m. on May 11. A schedule of events is available on the Provosts homepage.
Provost Thomas announced that four faculty have been chosen to represent Faculty Senate on the new Provosts Advisory Committee: Senators Baker-Sperry, Blackinton, and Mummert, and Bill Thompson of University Libraries. A complete list of Advisory Committee members will be sent to Faculty Senate and others once the remaining membership is determined. The Committee will begin meeting in fall semester.
Presentation of consolidated annual reports begins tomorrow, with the Student Affairs presentation at 8:00 a.m. followed by that of Academic Affairs at 9:30 a.m. in the Capitol Rooms. The presentations will also be broadcast to the Quad Cities campus.
Provost Thomas told senators he asked Assessment Coordinator Tere North, who administers 鶹s surveys, to briefly address Faculty Senate about that process:
Dr. North explained that when an individual, group, or organization wants to distribute an online survey, they must complete the Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval process to ensure that both the research and the survey meet the federal and University requirements governing human subjects research. IRB, administered through the Office of Sponsored Projects, verifies that the survey is valid and may require the person submitting it to complete a two-hour online training program that discusses how the information obtained can be utilized. Dr. North told senators she has completed 160 hours of survey training. Those wishing to distribute surveys online must also complete a batch email request, which must be signed by the appropriate vice president and by the Vice President for Administrative Services before email addresses are downloaded to Dr. North.
Dr. North explained the titles of particular surveys are generally quite clear, and any surveys can be deleted as desired. She said that use of a spam filter to prevent surveys from entering faculty mailboxes is not desirable because of the possibility of blocking information important for the faculty member to receive.
Dr. North explained the difference between the terms anonymous and confidential. She explained that anonymous indicates that a person can vote as many times as he or she wishes. Confidential means that persons must sign in prior to voting: a record is kept of whether each person voted or not, although not necessarily how each person voted. Dr. North told senators that 鶹s surveys are confidential, not anonymous. One exception to this was the recent survey on athletic team names, which allowed persons to vote as many times as they wished. Dr. North stated that, in theory, she could go back and determine how an individual voted. Dr. North asserted that with 50,000 survey responses received per year, she does not have the time or the desire to do this. When survey data is provided to a requesting individual, Dr. North explained that the data is scrubbed of anything that would identify respondents.
Senator Sonnek appreciates that the surveys faculty are asked to fill out are easy and clear. Dr. North told senators that some surveys submitted to her are not well done, but she cannot tell survey preparers not to ask certain questions. She has noticed that the easier surveys garner the most responses, and those with an open format that allow respondents to express their opinions work best.
Senator Blackinton wondered if her responses were being recognized since she uses a Macintosh computer. Dr. North responded that faculty can ask her to check whether their survey responses are being received. Once surveys are completed, if faculty check the finish box, they should be directed to an exit screen, typically HYPERLINK "http://www.wiu.edu" www.wiu.edu. Dr. North has experienced some difficulties with certain surveys operating correctly on Safari and Explorer browsers, but has had no problems with Firefox.
The question was raised whether Dr. North ever receives requests to identify faculty who have and have not responded to surveys. Dr. North responded that in the case of the deans review, she did send out information regarding who had not yet responded so that deans could personally contact those individuals. But she said deans had no way of knowing who ultimately responded by surveys end since to divulge that information would be a violation of federal guidelines.
Dr. North told senators that IRB is considering stiffening its requirements for survey distribution after a recent survey to many employees was generated using email addresses purchased from a company in India. She said Sponsored Projects is considering determining how samples are being collected prior to approval of surveys.
Parliamentarian Kaul asserted that faculty do not respond to some important surveys because of the number of surveys that they receive. Dr. North disagreed that the survey response rate is declining, stating that responses are increasing as faculty see that their voice is counted in online surveys. She reiterated that the subject line of emailed surveys always clearly states its objective.
D. Student Government Association Report
(Phyllida Kornoski, SGA representative to Faculty Senate)
Ms. Kornoski said SGA has not had a quorum for recent meetings so these have been informal sessions with more serious discussions anticipated for the beginning of fall semester.
E. Other Announcements
1. Revision to Guidelines for Designation as a School
Guidelines approved by Faculty Senate and President Goldfarb in December will be revised to eliminate a requirement that the Provost report endorsement of a request for designation as a school to the Administrative Affairs and Budget Committee prior to forwarding the request to the President for approval.
2. Today is the deadline for completed petitions for three fall vacancies on the University Personnel Committee. the College of Education and Human Services, the College of Fine Arts and Communication, and for University Libraries/Counseling Center/Illinois Institute for Rural Affairs. All are three-year positions. Only tenured, full professors may serve on UPC.
Motion: To reorder the agenda to consider Old Business A. and B. next (Hironimus-Wendt/ Blackinton)
MOTION APPROVED 17 YES 0 NO 3 AB
IV. Old Business (Reordered)
A. Proposed Resolution Regarding Coverage of Dependents Under the Domestic Partner Benefits Policy
Whereas 鶹 has adopted the Domestic Partner Benefits Policy with the intent of providing all of its faculty and staff with complete access to employment benefits, including importantly, access to health insurance; and
Whereas the Faculty has recently learned that dependent children of Domestic Partnerships are not covered under this current health insurance policy;
Therefore, be it resolved that the 鶹 Faculty Senate supports any and all efforts by 鶹 Administration to fully extend health benefit coverage under the Domestic Partner Benefits Policy to include the dependents of dependents.
RESOLUTION APPROVED 20 YES 1 NO 1 AB
B. Proposed Resolution for Establishment of 鶹 Lactation Rooms
Whereas, 820 Illinois Compiled Statutes 260/15 (Nursing Mothers in the Workplace Act) states:
Sec. 15. Private place for nursing mothers. An employer shall make reasonable efforts to provide a room or other location, in close proximity to the work area, other than a toilet stall, where an employee described in Section 10 can express her milk in privacy. (Source: P.A. 92-68, eff. 7-12-01.); and
Whereas, the 鶹 Faculty Senate is on record as supporting the creation of such rooms dedicated for nursing mothers to express breast milk; and
Whereas, providing a safe, private place to express breast milk on campus will make it easier for students, staff, and faculty to pursue academic work (and, indeed, all other work) at the University; and
Whereas, according to the Faculty Senate Bylaws, the Council on Campus Planning and Usage is charged with making recommendations regarding new space needs or modifications required to support academic programs of the University;
Therefore, be it resolved that the Council on Campus Planning and Usage will advocate for the creation of lactation rooms in appropriate locations across campus. The council will encourage and monitor progress toward the creation of these rooms and report back to the Senate at its first meeting of each semester until the Senate is satisfied that there are sufficient lactation rooms on campus.
Senator Boynton asked where the creation of lactation rooms fits into the Universitys budget priorities, in terms of other stated priorities such as making classrooms safer. 鶹 Organization for Women (WOW) President Bill Thompson responded that the lactation room proposed for the University Union is expected to cost between $7,500 and $10,000, although the cost will vary depending upon bringing buildings up to code. He said WOW cannot shoulder the entire cost of lactation rooms but will help raise money toward their creation.
Senator Meloy pointed out that lactation facilities are important for the Quad Cities campus as well and wording on the resolution should be changed to recognize the need on both campuses. This was accepted as a friendly amendment.
Senator Pynes asked if faculty members could offer their offices as places to express breast milk, such as when offices are designated safe spaces. He noted this would be a quick solution to the problem and would not require additional funding. Womens Studies Chair and WOW board member Polly Radosh informed senators that this option is available currently but has been found to be inadequate to the needs of nursing mothers. She also pointed out that 鶹 needs to comply with existing state law. Dr. Radosh stated a small refrigerator and running water would be ideal in lactation rooms, but what is mainly needed is a private space that can be used exclusively for the purpose of expressing breast milk. The space must be sanitary and lockable. Dr. Thompson added that to designate someones office as a lactation facility would be very inappropriate. He pointed out that while it would be difficult for one faculty member to ask another to leave his or her office so it can be used to express breast milk, it would be even harder for a student to make this request of a faculty member. Dr. Thompson stated that while the University currently is minimally compliant, it is not compliant to the level that it should achieve as an institution that speaks loudly for diversity and wants to be progressive. He expressed the need for neutral, publicly accessible spaces in University buildings open for long hours.
Senator Hironimus-Wendt stated it seems obvious that since establishment of lactation rooms is state law, 鶹 must comply regardless of cost, and Faculty Senate should make it known that they support this effort. Senator Jelatis asked how the proposed resolution is different than one Faculty Senate passed last year supporting creation of lactation rooms at 鶹. Dr. Thompson explained the current resolution would designate the Senates Council on Campus Planning and Usage as the body responsible for tracking progress on creation of lactation rooms. He added that 鶹s administration is not opposed to their creation but may need to be continually nudged to keep this issue to the forefront.
RESOLUTION APPROVED 20 YES 1 NO 1 AB
III. Reports of Committees and Councils
A. Council on Admission, Graduation and Academic Standards
(Gayle Mericle, Chair)
1. Recommendation to Eliminate Constitution Exam Graduation Requirement
CAGAS recommends elimination of the United States and Illinois Constitution Exam graduation requirement, which has been in place since 鶹 was a normal school for teachers. Only 鶹, Illinois State, and Northeastern Illinois Universities still list the Constitution Exam as a graduation requirement, and some students do not graduate from 鶹 despite passing all other academic requirements except for this exam. The report from CAGAS points out that every Illinois high school student must pass the exam to graduate. Out-of-state or foreign students can meet the graduation requirement by taking either POLS 122 or a $2 test at the county courthouse. Elimination of the examination was approved by CAGAS on April 17 and also has the support of the 鶹 administration.
NO OBJECTIONS
2. Recommendation to Support Revised Nursing Program Admissions Requirements
Senators considered only admissions requirements for the RN-to-BSN Completion program; requirements for the combined Basic and RN-BSN programs will be considered at a later date. 鶹 had been made to the originally distributed document to replace the requirement of a 2.75 grade or better for individual courses to a grade of C. Nursing Program Director Lea Monahan explained that she eventually wants students to maintain a C+ in individual classes once plus-minus grading is implemented, but a 2.75 is actually closer to the B range than Dr. Monahan would wish. When asked when plus-minus grading is anticipated to be in effect, Chairperson Rock responded the best guess is that it will be implemented in fall 2009. Chairperson Rock added that since 鶹 currently operates under a system of letter grades, it did not seem appropriate to express grades numerically in the Nursing admissions requirements at this time. A grade of 2.75 would remain in references to retention in the Nursing program; only references to individual class requirements would be changed to a grade of C.
Senator Pynes noted that 2.75 does not normally refer to a grade of C, which is usually represented as a 2.0. Dr. Monahan responded that the 2.75 would be 鶹s specific requirement for retention in the program, adding that students will need to maintain a grade of C in their cumulative GPA and in their courses.
Senator Blackinton stated she supports using a point system throughout the document rather than letter grades in some places and numeric references in others because determining a letter grade can become interpretive. Senator Edsall agreed, stating that it may become confusing once plus-minus grading is implemented to determine what is included in a C grade, which could be avoided by remaining with a numeric system throughout. Senator Siddiqi concurred that replacing references to C with 2.0 would be better in view of future plus-minus grading. Senator Hironimus-Wendt stated he supports expressing the grade as a 2.0 rather than as a C because even though 鶹 does not yet support plus-minus grading, other institutions which may be transferring students to 鶹 do utilize plus-minus, and some students could make a case for admission with a C- if only the letter grade C is used.
Friendly amendment: Substitute 2.0 for a grade of C in references to individual classes.
ADMISSIONS REQUIREMENTS APPROVED AS AMENDED
B. Council on Curricular Programs and Instruction
(Nancy Parsons, Chair)
1. Requests for New Courses
a. AAS 455, Rural Roots of Urban African Americans, 3 s.h.
b. ARTS 246, Digital Art Photography I, 3 s.h.
c. ARTS 340, Intermediate Drawing, 3 s.h.
When asked if it is typical for an art class to meet five hours per week, senators were told this is common practice. In Redistribution of Teaching Load, it is stated that ARTS 340 can be taught as a stacked class with Art 440. Chairperson of the Department of Art Charles Wright explained that stacked classes are those taught together and count as one three-hour course in terms of ACEs. This is commonly done in the arts; Senator Blackinton told senators that stacked courses are also offered in Theatre. Dr. Wright explained that ARTS 340 and 440 students will take their classes simultaneously in the same classroom but will study different levels of drawing. There are different requirements for each group of students and different syllabi for the two courses.
d. BC 210, Broadcast Media Technology and Design, 3 s.h.
e. EM 323, Emergency Preparedness and Response, 3 s.h.
f. EM 324, Legal Aspects of Emergency Management, 3 s.h.
g. EM 401, Hazard Mitigation and Disaster Recovery, 3 s.h.
h. EM 420, Research Applications in Emergency Management, 3 s.h.
i. WS 401, African American Women and Dance, 3 s.h.
Senator Edsall remarked that the course objective for students to demonstrate understanding of historical patterns in Black womens lives seems too broad for the course. Dr. Radosh replied that students would have some understanding of this concept before enrolling in the course as this is also covered in an introductory and a 300-level course offered within the department.
j. WS 495, Third-Wave Cinema, 3 s.h.
NEW COURSES APPROVED
2. Requests for 鶹 in Options
a. Applied Music
b. Computer Science Business
c. Computer Science Traditional
CHANGES IN OPTIONS APPROVED
3. Requests for 鶹 in Majors
a. Emergency Management
b. Health Sciences
c. Health Services Management
d. Telecommunications Management
CHANGES IN MAJORS APPROVED
C. Writing Instruction in the Disciplines Committee
(Jennifer McNabb, Chair)
1. Request for WID Inclusion
a. HSM 315, Long Term Care Management, 3 s.h.
HSM 315 APPROVED
D. Committee on Committees
(Kevin Hall, Chair)
SENATE COUNCILS AND COMMITTEES:
Writing Instruction in the Disciplines
Kathy Barclay, Curriculum & Instr. replacing Katherine Pawelko 11 E&HS
UNIVERSITY COMMITTEES:
Committee on FYE Classes (new positions)
Six faculty who are currently teaching or have taught FYE classes:
Lisa Barr, English/Journalism
Richard Gee, Sociology/Anthropology
Betsy Perabo, Philosophy/Religious Studies
John Stierman, University Libraries
Oswald Warner, Sociology/Anthropology
David Zanolla, Communication
Two at-large faculty members:
Samson Adeleke, Mathematics
Jongnam Choi, Geography
When asked why two faculty from the same department were nominated for the FYE positions when expressions of interest were received from 11 FYE faculty members, Senator Hall explained that CoC took into consideration current committees on which volunteers serve, whether the volunteer had filled out the February committee interest survey and had not been chosen for nomination at that time, and whether committee service might be needed for promotion and tenure. Six faculty had volunteered for the two at-large spots. When asked if it is traditional for CoC to designate whom the committee thinks should serve in vacant positions or whether the entire Senate should vote on all volunteers, Chairperson Rock explained that CoC normally brings forward a slate of candidates that it is up to the full Senate to confirm, or senators may submit additional nominations from the floor.
There were no additional nominees for the positions. The slate of candidates was declared elected.
E. Foreign Language/Global Issues Ad Hoc Committee
(Marty Maskarinec, Chair)
The ad hoc committee submitted its final report on operationalizing the requirements of the new foreign language/global issues (FLGI) graduation requirement. Under the new requirement, departments can specify that their majors will meet the requirement by either a) successful completion of an intermediate foreign language or demonstration of equivalent proficiency, b) taking a General Education course designated as GEGI, c) taking a 300-level or higher course in the major or in another department designated and approved as DSGI, or d) participation in a study abroad program of sufficient length and breadth as approved by Faculty Senate. The ad hoc committee recommends that the Council for International Education be named the body responsible for designating discipline-specific global issues (DSGI) courses, with the exception of general education global issues (GEGI) courses, which would be designated by the Council on General Education. The report recommends that the graduation requirement go into effect for all students beginning fall 2009.
Senator Baker-Sperry questioned the process whereby a department could specify a course in another department as the DSGI course for their students. She asked if the originating department would need to give approval to another department to use one of its courses for their majors. Senator Boynton noted that the originating department would have to have enough faculty to offer a sufficient number of sections if the course is used as a DSGI course by another department. Senator Maskarinec responded that originating departments own their courses and would be responsible for designating them as DSGI if desired. One department could not designate a course in a different department as the DSGI course for its majors if the originating department had not already submitted the appropriate paperwork to establish the course with that designation.
Senator Brice asked if the Center for International Studies would also have the ability to designate courses as FLGI since they now have the authority to grant credit for their courses. Senator Maskarinec responded the recommendation extends only to the Council for International Education as having the authority to recognize FLGI courses.
NO OBJECTIONS
Senator Boynton thanked the committee for their hard work, and Chairperson Rock added the committee did an excellent job with their task.
IV. Old Business
C. Proposal for Making the Online Course Information Subcommittee a Permanent Faculty Senate Committee
1. Second reading and vote on Bylaws amendment
Senator Boynton remarked that the database currently indicates that faculty have not yet turned in book orders, even when they have. Dr. Thompson, who was instrumental in developing the database, explained that when book orders are submitted, that information goes to the Union Bookstore. Bookstore employees check that faculty have submitted the correct titles and ISBN numbers of textbooks before sending the information on to STARS. Senator Boynton suggested that if the database could indicate that textbook information is pending, that would be better phraseology which would not imply that faculty have not yet submitted the information.
Senator Hironimus-Wendt said he would like to go on record as opposing the proposal because 1) he still does not view the course information database as an issue of faculty welfare and only superficially as an issue of curriculum development, and 2) he sees the responsibilities involved in maintaining the database as being subsumed under the Senates new Committee for Technology. Senator Hironimus-Wendt feels that creating a separate committee to manage the Bookstores database does not seem to be the responsibility of Faculty Senate. Dr. Thompson disagreed that Faculty Senate would be managing the Bookstores database. He said that one of the biggest differences between 鶹 and other universities is that 鶹 has not outsourced its bookstore functions, which allows the interface between the Bookstore and Faculty Senate that resulted in the database. Dr. Thompson said that when he showed the database at the Educause Midwest Conference recently, institutions that would be unable to generate this kind of partnership because of proprietary arrangements with outside bookstores envied 鶹s ability to do so. Dr. Thompson asserted that the Union Bookstore is performing a processing favor by checking book orders and passing the information on to STARS. He told senators this arrangement needs oversight by faculty willing to look after the health and welfare of the database. Dr. Thompson informed senators that glitches discovered in the system will be worked out over the summer, and a feature will be added so that students can directly use the ISBN numbers in the database to google for their books online. He said that since the computing infrastructure at 鶹 is complicated, some entity needs to push for these kinds of improvements and ask programmers to fix issues that arise.
Senator Pynes expressed his agreement with Senator Hironimus-Wendt, stating it seems that this committee could function equally well under the proposed Senate Committee for Technology. Chairperson Rock responded he sees the two committees as separate in terms of their missions. He explained the Committee for Technology would address issues of classroom technology and serve as a liaison between faculty and the administration on computing issues, while the database committee would interface between faculty and students in terms of providing course information.
Senator Miczo said he would like to go on record as opposing creation of a standing online course information committee because submission of course information was intended to be voluntary but promoting the system could lead to mandates from department chairs for faculty to participate in the process. He pointed out that disseminating information about the availability of the database is not the same as promoting it, which involves a coordinated, persuasive effort. Senator Boynton remarked that one reason to retain control of the database within Faculty Senate would be to maintain the faculty role and keep it voluntary. She knows of other universities where similar systems began with voluntary participation and were later mandated for faculty. She also expressed concerns about promoting a consumer mentality to students who wish to take the easiest courses. Senator Boynton stated that while she is not a big fan of the course information database, if it is going to exist she would like to see faculty retain ownership of it.
Senator Thompson agreed that submission of course information should remain absolutely voluntary. He said legislation being discussed in Springfield would mandate that state universities must make textbook information available to students, so 鶹 is already ahead of the curve.
BYLAWS AMENDMENT FAILED 2 YES 13 NO 7 AB
D. Proposal for a Faculty Senate Ad Hoc Committee for Technology
Senator Sonnek noted that a new chief technology security officer was recently hired for the University and she is unsure of the role of the many technology administrators and committees. She would like to know how many technology committees the University currently has, who are on them, and where they are housed. Senator Maskarinec, who proposed the committee, responded that its creation is intended to answer these types of questions. He noted that whenever the University wishes to undertake a technology initiative, it creates a new technology committee, yet faculty feel they have no single place to address their technology questions and issues. Senator Maskarinec stated his goal is to create a unified place to which all technology questions can be directed from Faculty Senate. He said President Goldfarb has approved a position for a new chief technology information officer, different from the chief technology security officer, but this position will not be filled until the reorganization of technology units on campus is completed.
In response to questions about possible membership, Senator Maskarinec said he proposes two faculty from each college with the committee deciding which technology administrators should be added as members. He said the committee would be dominated by faculty representation.
Provost Thomas stated that when deans recently expressed concerns about where to address technology issues, Joe Rives told them these issues should be brought to the attention of the technology representative within each college. Dr. Thomas said the intention is that technology representatives in each college will be able to deal with issues within that colleges departments, and Dr. Rives is working on refining this system.
Dr. Thompson indicated his support of the proposed committee, pointing out that technology is an integral part of the University to the point where without it, the University would find it difficult to exist. He said when something is that important to the life of the University and to the success of its pedagogical mission, the Faculty Senate needs to have a voice. He listed future changes to Zimbra or considerations of whether the University should participate in Internet 2, which would change a lot of faculty research agendas, as discussions in which the proposed committee could contribute. Senator Baker-Sperry stated her agreement with Dr. Thompson in terms of a Faculty Senate voice on technology issues. She sees the role of the new chief technology officer and college reps as very different from that of a Faculty Senate committee. She added that the Center for Innovation in Teaching and Research (CITR) is not closely linked with faculty governance, and bringing an issue before a committee is very different than taking a concern through a department chair, dean, and college technology representative. Senator Hironimus-Wendt also expressed his support for the proposal but said he would like to see an intentional linkage with CITR as part of the composition. He added this committee could provide a place to send the proposal for the online course information subcommittee. Senator Maskarinec said he could see this committee supporting issues from the online course information subcommittee proposal. He said communication and collaboration are what are needed in a technology committee.
Parliamentarian Kaul expressed his support of the proposed committee because faculty have no direct input on technology changes, but suggested that the wording technology in the proposal be changed to information technology because technology is a broad term that can include such items from a telescope for Physics to a mass spectrometer for Chemistry. Senator Maskarinec would support a name change for the committee.
Senator Pynes has not been particularly impressed with the technology changes implemented by Dr. Rives. He related that Dr. Rives said at a meeting that migration to Zimbra was voluntary and employees could use whatever mail system they wished but it would not continue to be supported by 鶹. Senator Pynes noted that this has not been the case, and faculty should not be forced to use a software program inadequate to their daily tasks. Senator Pynes objected to the way Zimbra was presented to the University and to the way technology is presented to faculty, and said he would support the creation of the new committee if it would prevent faculty from having to use technology from the mid-1990s. Ms. Kornoski remarked that the Zimbra migration seemed to be voluntary up to a point. Student leaders were targeted first for migration, followed by those that voluntarily migrated; then, two weeks after spring break, those students who had not voluntarily migrated were made to do so. Senator Pynes related he told Dr. Rives he did not appreciate having to switch from one email provider to another, and Dr. Rives claimed employees were not forced to do so. Senator Pynes stated that employees could utilize another email system prior to the implementation of Zimbra 5.0.2., but now email cannot be forwarded to another account. Parliamentarian Kaul disagreed, stating this is still possible.
Friendly amendment: To strike ad hoc from the committee title and to add the word information before technology (Siddiqi)
Senator Maskarinec feels the term information technology is too limiting for the proposed committee. He pointed out that a DVD player used in the classroom is not information technology but is technology that may be addressed in future by the committee. He added that the examples of technology provided earlier by Parliamentarian Kaul are very specific to a department so would not be considered by the proposed committee unless they were of general interest to all faculty. Parliamentarian Kaul feels some distinction needs to be made to indicate more specificity than the term technology provides. He noted that a lathe is a form of technology that clearly would not be part of the discussion of this committee. Senator Clontz suggested that distinctions of what types of technology will be considered or discussed will be brought out once the duties of the committee are submitted for Bylaws consideration in the fall. Senator Edsall suggested that instructional technology would fit the proposed scope of the committee. Senator Maskarinec supported changing the title to Committee for Instructional Technology.
Senator Sonnek supports the proposed committee, stating that it would address the need expressed by Provost Thomas for faculty voices in different departments to be heard in regards to technology needs. Senator Hironimus-Wendt also expressed his support and asked that Faculty Senate impose structure for the committee at this point.
Friendly amendment: That Faculty Senate create a committee consisting of three faculty members per college and charge the committee to come forward next semester with its responsibilities (Hironimus-Wendt)
Dr. Thompson requested that Faculty Senate consider adding a faculty member from the Library to the committee membership since University Libraries is the unit with the largest technology budget in the University and impacts all other 鶹 units. Senator Orwig stated his support for a specified Library representative, pointing out that as the owners of much technology, a Library voice on the committee would be very appropriate. Senator Maskarinec supported membership consisting of three faculty per college and one faculty member from University Libraries. Faculty would serve three-year staggered terms.
SENATOR ORWIG CALLED THE QUESTION
CREATION OF A 13-MEMBER (3 faculty per college, 1 faculty from Libraries) COMMITTEE FOR INSTRUCTIONAL TECHNOLOGY APPROVED 22 YES 0 NO 0 AB
Senator Maskarinec will bring forward specific duties and wording for the Faculty Senate Bylaws to the first fall Senate meeting. Committee on Committees will begin to solicit names for committee membership.
V. New Business
A. Proposed Resolution in Support of Legislation Legalizing Civil Unions
Whereas, 鶹 Illinois University's non discrimination policy advocates for the equality of its members in the workplace and before the law; and
Whereas, the lack of same sex marriage creates inequities in the workplace and before the law; and
Whereas, the inability to form civil unions also creates inequities in the workplace and before the law; and
Whereas, Senators David Koehler, Heather Steans, and Iris Martinez have introduced SB2436, Illinois Religious Freedom Protection and Civil Union Act, that would legalize civil unions and obviate the above inequities; and
Whereas, Representatives Gregg Harris, Sara Feigenholtz, Harry Osterman, Constance Howard, Barbara Flynn Currie, John A. Fritchey, Lou Lang, George Schully, Jr., Julie Hamos, Cynthia Soto, and Richard T. Bradley have introduced HB1826, Illinois Religious Freedom Protection and Civil Union Act, that would legalize civil unions and obviate the above inequities; and
Whereas, the 鶹 Illinois University President is on record as supporting same civil unions;
Therefore, be it resolved that the Faculty Senate asks the University President or his appointed designee to actively lobby the legislature for the passage of SB2436 and HB1826.
Senator Miczo asked if it often happens that Faculty Senate undertakes the kind of activist role requested by the proposed resolution. He noted that since the resolution takes a position on a proposal that is not yet state law, the Senate is being asked to undertake lobbying duties, as opposed to the Senates previously-approved resolution in support of lactation rooms, which has already been signed into law. Senator Miczo asserted that once the legislation passes, it would be appropriate for Faculty Senate to take a stand in support of implementing a law. He acknowledged that there is value in the basis for the arguments contained in the resolution, but said he feels uncomfortable having Faculty Senate support it because senators are supposed to represent faculty who, presumably, may have underlying values that prevent them from being in favor of civil union legislation. He expressed discomfort with Faculty Senate taking a position on this legislation as a body that is supposed to represent a diversity of faculty viewpoints.
Dr. Thompson told senators one reason he brought forward the resolution is that if the law is passed, the domestic partner problem in regard to dependent health insurance coverage would become a moot point, which directly affects faculty well being. He related that President Goldfarb has already asked University lobbyists to support this legislation, but the President indicated at the last Senate meeting that he would like it if Faculty Senate also sent a message so that he can indicate the body representing the faculty voice supports this legislation as well.
Senator Hironimus-Wendt stated his support for the resolution in principal, but finds the last line troublesome. He stated the Faculty Senate Chair lobbies on behalf of the Faculty Senate, not the President, and the line seems to assume that senators should lobby on behalf of the faculty on this issue. Senator Hironimus-Wendt hopes faculty support the proposed law, but believes senators have no understanding of the will of faculty as a whole on this issue, and although a senator at-large, he does not think he can speak on behalf of all 鶹 faculty. The senator stated he could support asking President Goldfarb to make clear to the legislature the feelings of senators on this issue, but the last line of the resolution seems to indicate that Senate is speaking on behalf of faculty at-large whose feelings are not known.
Senator Boynton personally supports the law, but agrees she does not know where faculty as a whole stand on this issue. She pointed out that senators regularly vote on curricular issues without knowing the feelings of all faculty, but this is a different kind of issue which affects some facultys religious beliefs. Senator Boynton stated she is uncomfortable supporting the resolution without polling faculty to see how they feel about the proposed law.
Senator Miczo remarked President Goldfarb wishes to be able to say he speaks for the faculty, but it is unknown how many faculty are even aware of the bill and want Faculty Senate to endorse it. Although hesitant to call for a survey, Senator Miczo feels a lot of intermediate steps are being bypassed for politically-motivated reasons and is not sure Faculty Senate wants to be caught up in this issue.
Senator Hironimus-Wendt asked if Dr. Thompson would consider changing the last line of the resolution to strike the phrase actively lobby the legislature and replace it with indicate Faculty Senates support. Dr. Thompson asked who the President would indicate Faculty Senates support to, stating that if he is to indicate Faculty Senates support to the legislature, there seems to be no difference between this and lobbying the legislature. Senator Hironimus-Wendt responded that rather than requiring the President to lobby on behalf of Faculty Senate, he would prefer the resolution to state that Faculty Senate supports the proposed law without indicating that the Senate is speaking on behalf of all faculty.
Friendly amendment: Replace the phrase actively lobby the legislature with supports the passage of (Maskarinec). Dr. Thompson accepted the amendment.
Senator Pynes expressed his support for the resolution, which he said addresses an important issue because genuine inequities exist in the current law. He does not see how Senate can object to the removal of certain inequities through civil unions yet supported the previous resolution addressing inequities in health insurance for dependents of domestic partners.
Parliamentarian Kaul also expressed his support of the resolution. He stated that it is presumed that Faculty Senate is the de facto voice of the faculty in other discussions and does not see why this issue is different. Senator Blackinton asked if using phraseology indicating the members of Faculty Senate rather than just Faculty Senate would make the resolution more clear, but Parliamentarian Kaul said this would mean the same thing. Senator Baker-Sperry remarked that senators are elected to represent faculty and do it all the time; if a faculty member is concerned about his or her representative making decisions indicating the will of the faculty, that person should attend every meeting and be concerned about every decision made at Faculty Senate. Senator Boynton agreed that when Faculty Senate speaks, it speaks on behalf of the faculty. She said some faculty have expressed their opposition to the proposed legislation to her, but no scientific polling of her college has occurred so she has no knowledge how the majority of those faculty she represents feel about this issue. Senator Boynton said she is unsure that eliminating reference to lobbying from the proposed resolution addresses that concern. Senator Pynes noted that senators are unable to represent every faculty member on any particular issue on which they vote since senators are only allowed one vote apiece.
Senator Blackinton said she is personally in favor of the resolution, but that if some are opposed to it, undecided about the issue, or concerned about whether faculty as a whole have been asked their opinions, it would look horrible for Faculty Senate to vote it down at this time. Senator Sonnek said she tries to send a message to faculty in her department when issues arise but she has not done so for this proposed resolution. She said while faculty may not always agree with the decision of Faculty Senate, it may be touchy for Senate to vote this resolution through. Senator Jelatis said she has no problem voting on what is in the best interests of faculty regarding curricular matters, but she does not feel comfortable voting on this proposal. She stated if Faculty Senate starts voting on what senators believe is good for the faculty politically, she does not know what future direction such an action might take. Senator Jelatis concluded that she is uncomfortable voting on something she feels is outside of her charge as a senator. Senator Baker-Sperry asked what sort of obligation Faculty Senate is under in regard to the disposition of the resolution since there are significant concerns about what faculty feel on this issue. Chairperson Rock responded that Faculty Senate could consider tabling the issue if desired.
SENATOR HIRONIMUS-WENDT CALLED THE QUESTION
MOTION TO CALL THE QUESTION APPROVED 18 YES 3 NO 1 AB
RESOLUTION FAILED 6 YES 8 NO 8 AB
Motion: To adjourn (Brice/Orwig)
The Faculty Senate adjourned at 5:34 p.m.
Darlos Mummert, Secretary
Annette Hamm, Faculty Senate Recording Secretary
PAGE
PAGE 6
3 A B K M S X Z ] d q % ˽uj_TI haa hP CJ aJ haa h+ CJ aJ haa hp} CJ aJ haa h@_ CJ aJ haa hIy
CJ aJ haa h7 5>*CJ aJ haa h7# CJ aJ h=Q CJ aJ haa hF| 56CJ aJ haa huu 56CJ aJ haa hIy
56CJ aJ haa h7 6CJ aJ haa h7 5CJ aJ haa h# CJ aJ haa h7 CJ aJ haa h7 B Y Z d
* + X Y s t ^ ` @& $a$ $@& a$ @& % 0 9 M Y r |
"
2
C
m
) * + / ɾ߾ߧߧԜߜɆɜ{p{ haa hJ CJ aJ haa hJ CJ aJ haa h$,+ CJ aJ haa h7# CJ aJ haa hrO CJ aJ haa h7 5CJ aJ haa h<: CJ aJ haa hP CJ aJ haa h+ CJ aJ haa huu CJ aJ haa h7 CJ aJ haa hnO CJ aJ haa hF| CJ aJ (/ G J K L S W X [ g r t x T W ` b j 輰蘍vjv^S^SG haa h6 5OJ QJ haa h6 CJ aJ haa h6 5CJ aJ haa h2 5CJ aJ haa h2 CJ aJ haa h2 >*CJ aJ haa h CJ aJ haa h{. >*CJ aJ haa hT+ 5CJ aJ haa h7 5CJ aJ haa hPo CJ aJ haa h@_ CJ aJ haa hT+ CJ aJ haa hJ CJ aJ haa h7 CJ aJ haa h7 >*CJ aJ t V W " A B w w n $ ^gd6 ^` gd6 m$<
\ `0 TpP !$`'0* -/2p5@8;=@CPF I `^``gd2 =
_ `0 Tp@ P !$`'0* -/2p5@8;=@CPF I @ ^@ `gd7 p
x
& . " & @ A D G ` e e & > ? @ A C S T U V Ǽǂwla haa hk CJ aJ haa h CJ aJ haa h7 CJ aJ haa h7 >*CJ aJ haa hm >*CJ aJ haa hm CJ aJ haa hcX >*CJ aJ haa hcX CJ aJ haa hO F CJ aJ haa hP CJ aJ haa hO F >*䴳 2 䴳 6 5O ϴ 6 ϴ # <
\ `0 8p@ P !$`'0* -/2p5@8;=@CPF I @ ^@ `gdm <
\ `0 8p@ P !$`'0* -/2p5@8;=@CPF I @ ^@ `gdm
gdcX ^ _ K K <
\ `0 X8p@ P !$`'0* -/2p5@8;=@CPF I @ ^@ `gdm <
\ `0 8p@ P !$`'0* -/2p5@8;=@CPF I @ ^@ `gdm <
\ `0 X8p@ P !$`'0* -/2p5@8;=@CPF I @ ^@ `gdm
' + > <
\ `0 8p@ P !$`'0* -/2p5@8;=@CPF I @ ^@ `gdm <
\ `0 X8p@ P !$`'0* -/2p5@8;=@CPF I @ ^@ `gdm <
\ `0 8p@ P !$`'0* -/2p5@8;=@CPF I @ ^@ `gdm > ? T U l m + , J J J J J :
Y `0 TP !$`'0* -/2p5@8;=@CPF I 0^`0gd2 =
_ `0 Tp@ P !$`'0* -/2p5@8;=@CPF I @ ^@ `gd7 <
\ `0 8p@ P !$`'0* -/2p5@8;=@CPF I @ ^@ `gdT+ V m
k l a b ~ F G ! " -" 1" T" _" `" c" d" h" " " " " [# a# # # # # hi hw5 6CJ aJ h9 CJ aJ haa hw5 CJ aJ hi CJ aJ haa h@B CJ aJ haa hG 5CJ aJ haa hG CJ aJ haa he CJ aJ haa h 3
CJ aJ hnI CJ aJ haa h6 CJ aJ haa h
CJ aJ 3 b c ! ! $ $ N& O& d( e( ?* @* + + - :
Y `0 TP !$`'0* -/2p5@8;=@CPF I 0^`0gd2 # $ !$ $ N& & ' ' ' ' ' ' c( d( ( ( ( ( ( >* ?* q* V+ [+ + + ,
, - - - - - ̥̥̽̽̏̚턏yncX haa h7 CJ aJ haa h2 CJ aJ haa h CJ aJ haa h-, CJ aJ haa h(^ CJ aJ haa h'R CJ aJ haa h@B CJ aJ haa h<: CJ aJ haa h~ 0J CJ aJ j haa h~ CJ UaJ haa h~ CJ aJ haa h CJ aJ haa hb& CJ aJ h9 CJ aJ haa hw5 CJ aJ - - B- }- ~- 0. 1. I. J. . . / / y y t t t t k t p^pgdg gdGx ^gd(^ ^<
\ `0 TpP !$`'0* -/2p5@8;=@CPF I `^``gd]G :
Y `0 TP !$`'0* -/2p5@8;=@CPF I 0^`0gdPo - :- A- }- ~- /. 0. 1. 2. 3. 5. H. I. O. . . . . . 8/ :/ / / / X0 \0 0 0 0 0 (1 )1 *1 21 1 1 1 1 1 ƻƻƜ}}}}ƻq}f}q} haa hvr CJ aJ haa h`_
5CJ aJ haa h`_
CJ aJ h9 CJ aJ haa hg >*CJ aJ haa hg CJ aJ haa hGx >*CJ aJ h " CJ aJ haa hGx CJ aJ haa h(^ CJ aJ haa he CJ aJ haa h7 CJ aJ haa h7 >*CJ aJ haa h >*CJ aJ &/ )1 *1 1 1 1 1 1 1 72 82 3 3 3 3 4 4 4
& F 0^`0gd`_
5
_ `0 8TP !$`'0* -/2p5@8;=@CPF I gd`_
gd`_
^gd`_
gdGx p0^p`0gdg 1 1 1 82 92 A2 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 5
5 a5 b5 c5 6 6 6 6 &7 -7 .7 /7 7 7 7 ~8 8 8 8 h: 7; =; _; < < Z= l= = = = = = = h> ܽ h9 h9 hJ 5 haa hJ haa hw% haa h<: 6 haa h7{ haa h<: h9 5haa h<: 5haa h<: 5CJ aJ haa h<: CJ aJ haa h`_
5CJ aJ haa h`_
CJ aJ haa h`_
>*䴳 54 4 5 5 5 6 6 %7 &7 7 7 8 8 : : < < n= o=
& F ^gd<:
& F p0]^p`0gd<:
& F 0^`0gdw%
& F p0^p`0gd gd`_
& F gd`_
& F 0^`0gd`_
h> ~> > H? R? X? a? ? ? B HB IB KB WB ZB B B B B B B B B C C C C C E E E E E E E E E E F #F %F 'F *F aF F F ƻv haa haa >*CJ aJ haa hg CJ aJ haa hg >*CJ aJ haa h[t CJ aJ haa hY| CJ aJ haa h7 >*CJ aJ haa h7 CJ aJ haa h<: haa hg 5h " haa hJ haa hg haa h*g h9 haa haa haa h) -o= C C E E E E %F &F bF {F |F F F I I I I 8J 9J N N O
p^p`gdd
gdFe
& F p0]^p`0gd<:
& F ^gd<: F F F F H H )I 0I I I I I I 7J 8J K wL M #M (M M M M M M M CN bN fN N N N N N N O O O P 4Q 5Q Q S PS QS US ꬡ⬖▋⡖⋖ haa hw{L CJ aJ haa h CJ aJ haa hm CJ aJ haa h CJ aJ haa hbx. CJ aJ haa hbx. >*CJ aJ haa hd 5CJ aJ haa hg CJ aJ h " CJ aJ h9 CJ aJ haa hd CJ aJ haa haa CJ aJ -O O QS RS S S S S T ,T -T KT LT T T T T W W 1X kX
gd
@ ^@ gdd
gd
gdFe
p^p`gdd US _S iS S S S S S S S T T 2T 9T :T IT JT LT OT PT T T T T U W W 4X 5X kX oX pX X X X X X X X ƺwwwllalllhaa h0]w CJ aJ haa h*I] CJ aJ haa h
CJ aJ haa h5 CJ aJ haa hd CJ aJ haa h&s >*䴳 䴳 +Ո 䴳 >*䴳 䴳 䴳 m 䴳 m 5C 5C & X X , Z Z . / հ [ [ [ [ [ <
\ `0 X8p@ P !$`'0* -/2p5@8;=@CPF I @ ^@ `gd0]w X +Y 3Y jY Z Z Z Z [ [ [ %[ -[ 5[ T[ [ [ [ [ [ \ \ ~\ \ \ \ \ ] M] ^] c] d] e] g] ~] ] ] ] ÷ګϷϟϗϷϟϟϷόqc haa h r 5CJ \aJ haa h r 5>*CJ \aJ haa h[t >*CJ aJ haa h[t CJ aJ h CJ aJ haa hw >*CJ aJ haa h5 >*CJ aJ haa hw 5CJ aJ haa h5 5CJ aJ haa hw CJ aJ haa h5 CJ aJ haa h*I] CJ aJ h9 CJ aJ h CJ aJ %\ 1\ S\ x\ y\ \ \ \ \ \
] ] D] H] ^] c] <
\ `0 8p@ P !$`'0* -/2p5@8;=@CPF I @ ^@ `gdw <
\ `0 X8p@ P !$`'0* -/2p5@8;=@CPF I @ ^@ `gd0]w c] ] ] ] ] ] ] '^ f a T C ]^`gd=t ^`gd r gd r 2
Y `0 Xp@ P !$`'0* -/2p5@8;=@CPF I gdFe 2
Y `0 Xp@ P !$`'0* -/2p5@8;=@CPF I gd[t 2
Y `0 p@ P !$`'0* -/2p5@8;=@CPF I gd[t ] ] ] ^ ^
^ ^ "^ &^ (^ =^ @^ X^ h^ i^ j^ l^ ^ _ _ _ ` )` =a Aa a %b *b Lb Mb Tb _b Xc Yc c c 濱ڀڀttthhhhhZ haa hG >*CJ \aJ haa hG CJ \aJ haa h$ CJ \aJ h
h=t >*CJ \aJ haa h r >*CJ \aJ h
h r CJ \aJ h
CJ \aJ haa h r 5CJ \aJ haa h r 5>*CJ \aJ haa h r CJ \aJ haa h=t CJ \aJ haa h r CJ \aJ haa h=t >*CJ \aJ #'^ (^ ?^ @^ i^ j^ ^ ^ ^ _ D_ l_ _ _ _ _ _ _ Yc Zc c c c d d gdG ^gd$ ^`gd=t ^`gd r gd r c d d d d e e %f 'f g 9g ;g =g >g Eg ^g g g g g h /h h h h i i i i i j j j j j j k k k k l l m m m m m ɽձձɨɚɎw haa hs >*CJ aJ haa hs CJ aJ haa h=t CJ \aJ haa h, 5CJ \aJ hqh CJ \aJ haa hO. CJ \aJ haa hO CJ \aJ haa h, CJ \aJ hAc CJ \aJ haa hT CJ \aJ h
CJ \aJ haa hG CJ \aJ .d 9h :h k k l l l l m m m m m m /n 0n p
& F p^pgd
& F 0^`0gd
& F gd<: 5
_ `0 8TP !$`'0* -/2p5@8;=@CPF I gds gd r ^gdG m m m m m m n n .n /n lp qp q q 8r Zt [t at jt t t t u u w w &x *x Wx jx kx lx tx x { { 3{ | | ~ ~ 4 c g ŽŽŲŜ}Љ haa h 5CJ aJ haa h CJ aJ hqh CJ aJ haa hX8 CJ aJ haa h-y# CJ aJ haa hO. CJ aJ hAc CJ aJ haa h CJ aJ haa h >*䴳 >*䴳 <: CJ aJ haa h<: >*CJ aJ /p p w w z z ~ ~ 3 4 b c ƃ ǃ ڄ ۄ ތ ߌ
& F ^gdp
& F ^gdEB
& F gd
& F p^pgd Ń ƃ ǃ ȃ ڄ S a h : D ތ I J 4 = ͓
" # / ٘ ܘ 힖햅}r hkf. hkf. CJ aJ hP CJ aJ heMR CJ aJ hkf. 5CJ aJ hkf. CJ aJ h\' CJ aJ haa CJ aJ h-y# CJ aJ haa h-y# CJ aJ haa hF CJ aJ haa hM CJ aJ haa hp CJ aJ haa h CJ aJ hqh CJ aJ haa hEB CJ aJ ,
H I } ~ 1 2 5
_ `0 8TP !$`'0* -/2p5@8;=@CPF I gds
& F L]L^gdt
& F ^gdkf.
& F ^gdEB ř G H I ] @ ʜ | } ~ 1 2 _ ` a b i j ϸ}rf] h58 5CJ aJ h>j h>j 5CJ aJ h>j h>j CJ aJ h> > <: h]4 h]4 >* haa h<: haa he>y haa h9 >* haa h9 haa hob CJ aJ hkf. hkf. CJ aJ ht hP 5CJ aJ hP CJ aJ h58 CJ aJ hkf. 5CJ aJ hkf. CJ aJ h\' CJ aJ hqh CJ aJ " ` a \ ] ˠ ̠ ~ 2 H I í ĭ
& F ^gdt
& F ^gd>j ^gd>j `^``gd>j
& F gd9 j k ] d e f ̠ Ӡ Ԡ F G " # $ ~ 1 2 ߥ h G H
: P Q R V W _ w Ȭ ݬ ! ) í : Ѯ ƿ hdb hdb 6hdb h\S h-;k h58 ht h]4 h>j h>j h>j h>j 5h58 CJ aJ h58 5CJ aJ h>j h>j 5CJ aJ h>j h>j CJ aJ h>j 5CJ aJ > $ % 0 1 X Y z {
& F ,
M P !$`'0* -/2p5@8;=@CPF I gd6@
& F gd9
& F ^gdt S $ Y x dz ˳ " C G I h { " d i ϻ ӻ - 8 @ F ; Ҿ : I $ h X Y a m ĸ haa h7 CJ aJ haa h7 5CJ aJ haa h<: hz hz 5h g hz hp5 hk hk 6hk h . 5h58 h . h
~ hdb Dm s x z {
$ % & ' ( * + , ߺ h " 0J mH nH uhm
hm 0J j hm 0J Uhv j hv Uhaa hc}j CJ aJ haa hiy+ CJ aJ haa h7 haa h7 CJ aJ haa h<: CJ aJ haa h= CJ aJ !{ &`#$ !
& F
p@ `$ P@& ^`Pgdc}j
& F
p@ P@& ^`P
& F
p@ P^`P
& F @& ( ) * + , !
& F
p@ `$ P@& ^`Pgdc}j &`#$ 5
01h:pob / =!8"*#$h% ^% 2 0 @ P ` p 2 ( 0 @ P ` p 0 @ P ` p 0 @ P ` p 0 @ P ` p 0 @ P ` p 0 @ P ` p 8 X V ~ _HmH nH sH tH @ ` @ N o r m a l CJ _HaJ mH sH tH P P H e a d i n g 1 $
& F
@& >*CJ aJ R R H e a d i n g 2 $
& F @&^ 5CJ \aJ H H H e a d i n g 3 $
& F @& >*CJ aJ J J H e a d i n g 4 $
& F @& 5CJ \aJ Z Z H e a d i n g 5 $
& F @&]^ 5CJ \aJ D A` D D e f a u l t P a r a g r a p h F o n t V i V T a b l e N o r m a l :V 4 4
l a ( k ( N o L i s t X / X L e v e l 1 7$ 8$ H$ ^ OJ QJ _HaJ mH sH tH X /X L e v e l 4 @ 7$ 8$ H$ ^@ OJ QJ _HaJ mH sH tH X /X L e v e l 3 p7$ 8$ H$ ^p OJ QJ _HaJ mH sH tH X /"X L e v e l 5 7$ 8$ H$ ^ OJ QJ _HaJ mH sH tH X C 2X B o d y T e x t I n d e n t
^ >*CJ aJ 6 B B6 B o d y T e x t CJ aJ 4 @ R4 F o o t e r
! . )@ a. P a g e N u m b e r X R@ rX B o d y T e x t I n d e n t 2
& F ^ CJ aJ 6 U@ 6 H y p e r l i n k >*B*ph X S X B o d y T e x t I n d e n t 3
& F ^ CJ aJ B >@ B T i t l e $L^La$ 5CJ \aJ F V F F o l l o w e d H y p e r l i n k >*B* ph Z Y Z D o c u m e n t M a p -D M
CJ OJ QJ ^J aJ t N 1t B o d y T e x t F i r s t I n d e n t 2
h x ^h` >* CJ aJ @ @ W P 9 _ T i t l e $1$ a$ 5aJ h ^ h N o r m a l ( W e b ) & d d d [$\$] ^ CJ OJ QJ aJ * W * S t r o n g 5\6 6 l e v e l 1 ! d d [$\$ H "H B a l l o o n T e x t " CJ OJ QJ ^J aJ $ 1$ X7 o b j e c t f @ Bf 6 L i s t P a r a g r a p h $ d ^m$ CJ OJ PJ QJ ^J aJ PK ! [Content_Types].xmlj0Eжr(Iw},-j4 wP-t#bΙ{UTU^hd}㨫)*1P' ^W0)T9<l#$yi} ;~@(Hu* Dנz/0ǰ $ X3aZ,D0j~3߶b~i>3\`?/[G\!-Rk.sԻ..a濭? PK ! ֧ 6 _rels/.relsj0 }Q%v/C/} (h"O
= C?hv=Ʌ%[xp{۵_Pѣ<1H0ORBdJE4b$q_ 6LR7`0̞O,En7Lib/Se е PK ! ky theme/theme/themeManager.xml M
@}w7c(Ebˮ CAǠҟ7՛K
Y,
e.|,H ,lxɴIsQ}#Ր ֵ+!,^$j=GW)E+&
8 PK ! P theme/theme/theme1.xmlYOo6w toc'vuر-Mn iP@I}úama[إ4:l ЯGRX^6؊>$ !)O^rC$y@ /yH*)UDb`}"qۋJחX^)I`nEp)liV[]1M<OP6r=zgbIguSe bORD۫qu gZo~ٺlAplxpT0+[}`j zA V2Fi@qv֬5\|ʜ̭NleXd sjcs7f
W+Ն7` g ȘJj|h(KD-
dXiJ؇(x$( :;˹! I_TS 1?E ??ZBΪmU/ ?~xY'y5g&/ɋ>GMGeD3Vq%'#q$8K )fw 9:ĵ
x}rxwr:\TZaG*y8IjbRc|XŻǿI
u3KGnD 1NIBs
RuK>V.E L+M2#'fi ~V vl{u8z H
* :( W ☕
~JTe\O*tHGHY }KNP*ݾ˦ TѼ9/#A7qZ $*c?qUnwN%Oi4 =3ڗP
1Pm \\9Mؓ2aD];Yt\[x]}Wr|]g-
eW
)6-rC Sj
id DЇAΜIqbJ#x꺃 6k#ASh&ʌt(Q% p%m&]caS l=X\P1Mh9MVdDAaVB[݈fJíP|8 քAV^f
Hn- "d>znNJ ة>b&2vKyϼD:,AGm\nziÙ .uχYC6OMf3or$5N HT[XF64T,ќM0E)`#5XY`פ ;%1U٥m;R>QD DcpU'&LE/pm%]8firS4d 7y\`JnίI R 3U~7+#m qBiDi*L69mY&iHE=(K&N!V.KeLDĕ{D vEꦚdeNƟe(MN9ߜR6&3(a/DUz<{ˊYȳV)9Z[4^n5!J?Q3eBoCM m<.vp IYfZY_p[=al-Y}Nc͙ŋ4vfavl'SA8|*u{-ߟ0%M07% < ҍ PK !
ѐ ' theme/theme/_rels/themeManager.xml.relsM
0wooӺ&݈Э5
6?$Q
,.aic21h:qm@RN;d`o7gK(M&$R(.1r'JЊT8V"AȻHu}|$b{ P8g/ ]QAsم(#L[ PK- ! [Content_Types].xmlPK- ! ֧ 6 + _rels/.relsPK- ! ky theme/theme/themeManager.xmlPK- ! P theme/theme/theme1.xmlPK- !
ѐ ' theme/theme/_rels/themeManager.xml.relsPK ]
, $ $ $ ' % / V # - 1 h> F US X ] c m j m , b d e g l n p r t v x z } t B ^ > - / 4 o= O kX \ c] '^ d p
{ , c f h i j k m o q s u w y { | ~ , X ' ! ! 8 @ 0 (
B
S ? \ f @ @ 0Q 1Q V W tW {W X X Z Z Z Z [ \ b )b Ud _d Xl `l n o x x Az Kz |
| P Z 4 : m s r x Ҕ ܔ : D י $ , ? F S X c m * - e l ! ( S Z
'
P W = N B O # # ( ( ) ) * * , , c- k- m- - K7 W7 = = F F OL UL L L L L *P /P 4P 9P oP tP P P P P 0Q 5Q R R U U pV wV Y Y a a of f mg ~g h h Ew Nw #| *| & ) , 8 6 H
, V [ N Z < E * - 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Z ] 2& 3& = = @ @ ϳ ӳ - 8 V V @ F Ͷ Ҷ
: I r r $ h * - Z ] 2& 3& = = @ @ ϳ ӳ - 8 V V @ F Ͷ Ҷ
: I r r $ h - ]FR X6 <dGj *9J 'Da$\T V'0]:C F...t
u9@ K T q | F uu Y
" 9% M m t Z wH $b *f / 0M
$ hR ~ " 8 p z q ] P e BW k 0 x 9 G m
D xo K! ! ?5! k! v" m " # a8# 8# A# G# RU# -y# D$ ;S$ jj$ % % {J% O% `% q% x% & ,& ~4& #' \' w' ' \( P|( }) 5) A) * /* `* + + $,+ T+ qU+ iy+ ', PL, ? YN? \? c? ,~? 6@ L@ ,A CA AMA
B juB ~zB dC %fC /lC D H D 8VD )gD E o E YF O F 9 F 3F OHF ]fG gG I I P5I J *J 0J *K &L LL )_L w{L )M
N O nO rO P 2P E&Q :Q aQ H&R 'R eMR qMR ZmR S aJS \S
T 9T +=T KVT U U U h U |YU iU V 2V vV GW C=W cX #Y KY #QY rY
Z 1Z *wZ zZ -[ \ ,\ S\ ]\ n\ |\ "] *I] _] e] (^ v_ @_ GZ` @ a la lza b Nb IHb db fb ob Pgc *bd hd 3jd ,e 6e Fe Vf g j kj c}j k -;k !Dk ck Hl f:l Ul Mml O*m ^m ym ` n kn $o hDo Po ;Vo 2ro *Sp 1ep q /Kq Vq lq r pr z r G?r s ,s =t t "t t't TBt Ht bt u U$u v v euv Q
w w w "Jw 0]w Gx y e>y rz z Jz oz C
{ ;A{ 3M{ +[{ c{ 3| F| |,} i`}
~ ~ *:~ !=~ l|~ ' Y" 7 ; ]G = g V *: AG B O w^ x -, A =Q No 5 9 J +] lH ` k &s + *i ~ 3 9; g
wM c *g m v Y| p5 i j l U{ | %2 c `
( B Q) DO 6d a : ^ N 6\ i w% @B au A U p w }x m 6 f U " Q & { m I d 9 cB H c o ; L d k T c t . I ^ b& TE | D} Is 1N Vd > q+ L k 7{ e& mg J -x p} " =) C J ^ i k z O 58 C r I / f P J V
i% 4 , V< > N( O ^d
X r * }9 F H sd , b 5n ( P $ :Q ( { T +* , pl J" D lH l )n x' jI 80 aa # 54 Fe q z [0 3 FM r 3" * # `5 W qh r {
O. k/ 6 H? @C p i Z 7# ?( 7 D ,O 2 d A S Z h y V& < @ CC aQ W # [ a Vi ~ X6 w? W A x 6
_ p [t {. L ]R } j 1 7 q) @F PN Aj vr & & C h P= V q i\ c J <: i v ) Es , @ :I 6K \ # @ ~ P 2 # D q v * 4@ ]J P F h .y T
4 7 K V Fa nz $ kf w ]4 @ DM i ! ) < EB [ . . L l m Uw <8 8 ; Tb f a )d k i. 57 Jj z 4 ]\ n # = 1 IN T o : _c O g( N P T W [ r . : 1 m y ) @ @ @ @ @ @ , H @ U n k n o w n
G * T i m e s N e w R o m a n 5 S y m b o l 3. * A r i a l 71 C o u r i e r 5. * a T a h o m a 7. V e r d a n a 7. { @ C a l i b r i ?= * C o u r i e r N e w ; W i n g d i n g s A B C a m b r i a M a t h " 1 h 4fF׆F׆6 C _ Q C _ Q 8 4 d 2q HP ? @Z 2 ! x x W E S T E R N I L L I N O I S U N I V E R S I T Y A n n e t t e H a m m A n n e t t e H a m m L
Oh +'0 , 8
X d p
| WESTERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY Annette Hamm Normal.dotm Annette Hamm 54 Microsoft Office Word @ n @ Ӵ @ @\ɪ@ Ӵ C ՜. +,D ՜. +,` h p
鶹 Illinois University Q _ WESTERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY Title 8 @ _PID_HLINKS A ` s 9 h t t p : / / w w w . w i u . e d u / G
! " # $ % & ' ( ) * + , - . / 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 : ; < = > ? @ A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z [ \ ] ^ _ ` a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z { | } ~ R o o t E n t r y F p̞ D a t a
1 T a b l e f W o r d D o c u m e n t 7 S u m m a r y I n f o r m a t i o n ( D o c u m e n t S u m m a r y I n f o r m a t i o n 8 C o m p O b j y
F' Microsoft Office Word 97-2003 Document
MSWordDoc Word.Document.8 9q